User talk:Paula's Choice

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:Paula Begoun. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:32, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Ooops! This was not our intent. I had intended to update, but evidently just erased everything. The page hadn't been updated since 2008, and it was my intention to revise for neturality and address the concerns of reads. Apologies. Paula's Choice (talk) 17:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC) Nathan[reply]

I get it- we usually keep old talk conversations, to show what's already been done to an article, and just add new discussion to the bottom. I fixed it for you, so no harm, no foul. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate the help! I am not sure if this question is your department, but the page in question http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Begoun received a flag for bias warning. I have revised and removed any language that may have warrented this, along with providing additional credible citations. Again, I am not sure if this is your department, but would this qualify to have the warning removed?

I get the impression that you're directly connected with Paula Begoun; it would be good if you get a totally neutral person to review it first. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard is most often used for problems with people trying to advertise, but I think that if you left a note there asking for some neutral editor/s to give it read, you'd probably find a volunteer or two. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:01, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you. I have done this! Paula's Choice (talk) 23:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC) Nathan[reply]

Closing noticeboard requests[edit]

Hi. I have restored the content you removed here. Talk pages and noticeboards are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is not a good idea, even though I'm sure you meant well. If you've gotten all the feedback that you want, you might add a note to the end saying so, or you can even put a note at the top of the section, such as {{resolved}} (curly brackets and all). If you pasted {{resolved|Feedback has been provided; thanks ~~~~}} on the page, for example, it would show up like this (remember to include the curly brackets!):

Resolved
 – Feedback has been provided; thanks ~~~~

Except where there are ~~~~ would be your signature. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:31, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 : Ah,thank you!  will do. I wasn't sure what the process was, but I do now.  Have a great dayPaula's Choice (talk) 21:25, 13 July 2010 (UTC) Paula's Choice[reply]