User talk:Paral Aydzen

Welcome!

Hello, Paral Aydzen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 16:47, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

This edit strongly suggests that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. I strongly suggest that you read WP:BLP, because I am going to block your account indefinitely if you continue editing like that.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:33, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would strongly suggest u start reading edit summaries before reverting them, moron. --Paral Aydzen (talk) 15:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for Gross violations of WP:BLP; the user is WP:NOTTHERE--Ymblanter (talk) 15:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.[reply]

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paral Aydzen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made 2 (well, technically - 3, but only technically) 3 edits to the Aung_San_Suu_Kyi page. Called her war criminal and added 4 well-respected sources for that statement (there were some other much smaller changes like adding that she is also a nobel prize laureate to the second sentence of the article). And got permabanned. Is this how Wikipedia works, or is it just some admin's overreaction? Paral Aydzen (talk) 15:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 18:39, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

- I apparently made 5 edits, but the 2nd edit consisted of mentioning her Nobel prize in the second sentence of the article, while the third constituted of mentioning the Pope's and Desmond Tutu's decrial of her actions. Even if u consider the well-sourced 'war criminal' statement to be permabannable (because wikipedia is censorship, right?) i dont think u can call these two edits problematic.