User talk:PapaDoc88

Welcome![edit]

Hello, PapaDoc88, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 08:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alliance Global Group may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Articles for deletion/'''Alliance Global Group''']]
Articles for deletion/'''Alliance Global Group''']]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance Global Group[edit]

I fixed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance Global Group so it is formatted correctly and added it to the log. GB fan 15:20, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Dolescum. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Alliance Global Group because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dolescum (talk) 18:09, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The company does not dictate the content of wikipedia. Furthermore, your statements about knowing the wishes of the company suggest you have a conflict of interest. I suggest you refrain from editing the article further. Dolescum (talk) 18:17, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alliance Global Group. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PapaDoc88. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alliance Global Group for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alliance Global Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance Global Group (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]