User talk:P0G41oxepU

P0G41oxepU, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi P0G41oxepU! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

I see you were able to locate the Sutton article pretty quickly! If you’re looking for any more of his work in the future I would recommend checking out the Antony C. Sutton Archive, which I believe is the largest collection of his work available online. Glad I was able to help you find something you like. Neighborhood Nationalist (talk) 09:59, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart N.V. (June 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

needs additional sources. Could use additional content. also

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart N.V. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart N.V., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 15:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

Please note that the WP:NPOV policy is about accurately representing reliable sources. I have undone your edit at Daniel Estulin. Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 12:01, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dirk Bezemer[edit]

The article Dirk Bezemer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Acroterion (talk) 22:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Solved P0G41oxepU (talk) 22:21, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dirk Bezemer for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dirk Bezemer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirk Bezemer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Acroterion (talk) 16:47, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

your edits to Peter Dalglish[edit]

Hi P0G41oxepU, I noticed your edits to Peter Dalglish. His criminal conviction was already in the lead and in a later section of the article; adding sensationalist language like "a front that allowed him to systematically carry out sexual abuse of children" isn't supported by the source you added (no original research includes drawing conclusions not stated in the source) and may be a violation of Wikipedia policies on biographies of living people. Please read that policy, it's an important one. Other editors have reverted a few of the changes you made. If you feel that the article doesn't properly reflect information in reliable sources, please open a discussion on Talk:Peter Dalglish and gain consensus for any controversial changes. Thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 15:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi, please be reminded there are no rules or policies on Wikipedia. Also please check the article's talk page. Thank you. P0G41oxepU (talk) 15:59, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

P0G41oxepU, there are policies for Wikipedia content. Thank you for taking it to the Talk page. Schazjmd (talk) 16:22, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for WP:3RR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 21:53, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

P0G41oxepU (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The people reporting me have not made an edit on the talk pages before reverting. They reverted without listing a reason in the WP:edit summary P0G41oxepU (talk) 21:18, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were given a reason here("BLP violations") but the issue here is not other users' lack of edit summaries, but your edit warring. Please review policy on edit warring as well as the Biographies of Living Persons policy and address these in your next unblock request as well as how you will resolve disputes in the future(if you wish to be unblocked early). I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 22:10, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, if there are three people all reverting you sometimes it is a signal something might have gone wrong.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how anything in life works. Just a few decades ago, the majority of "experts" thought that homosexuality was a psychiatric disease. Veracity is not decided by the majority. P0G41oxepU (talk) 21:24, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ymblanter, 331dot, the user's apparently antisemitic and certainly incompetent edits on Talk:Jeffrey Epstein, and their inept BLP violations on Bill Clinton give me great concern. If the editor hadn't been blocked already, and if they hadn't created an article or two, I'd have blocked them for WP:NOTHERE. P0G41oxepU, you are walking a very thin line here, and your "majority" comparison makes no sense whatsoever. (And calling those reverts "vandalism" is just dumb.) If you make one more such edit, you will be blocked indefinitely. Drmies (talk) 23:39, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No doubt P0G41oxepU has engaged in various sorts of disruption, but I don't see their antisemitism at Talk:Jeffrey Epstein. This is not an anti-semitic comment. And I hope you don't take offense to this, but I think you've become too involved in that content dispute to keep swinging your mop around. R2 (bleep) 00:15, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, [1] is a point of great concern to me. If this resumes, I am afraid an indefinite NOTHERE block would be in order.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:26, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think George W. Bush is jewish? P0G41oxepU (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is not really relevant what I think of George W. Bush, what is relevant is that you added to the lede unsourced BLP violations and apparently do not understand that they were BLP violations.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:16, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The charge was anti-semitism. I ignore any rules that prove inconvenient when editing Wikipedia. P0G41oxepU (talk) 12:33, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With this attitude, I extend your block for indefinite duration. Now you will have to convince a neutral administrator that your ability to edit Wikipedia is beneficial for the project. You likely have two or three chances before your talk page access gets revoked, use them wisely.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart N.V. concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart N.V., a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Operation Juliana[edit]

Hello, P0G41oxepU. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Operation Juliana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 12:26, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart N.V. concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart N.V., a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]