User talk:Pé de Chinelo

Welcome!

Hello, Pé de Chinelo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Barkjon 22:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Body of Lies (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:52, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling video games[edit]

I invite you to discuss in the talk page of the list about the Brawl vs. Tekken issue. I have reverted to the original wording (where Brawl was the best selling video game) because, when an issue arises, the article should be reverted to its original form and the sides should discuss. So, I advice you to discuss and not change the article without consensus, otherwise it may be observed that you are trying to push your point and not reach consensus. Thanks for understanding. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 19:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you have been involved in the discussion regarding this game. the evidence is there. It IS a fighting game - PERIOD. do not re-revert as it has been discussed - and concluded. Its a majority ruling of everyone to you. Let it drop or don't edit the article. Also your source isn't classed as reliable. Do not use it again. chocobogamer LOOK AT WHAT I DID 18:58, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. I had to revert the page twice because of you. However, you may have helped the page by possibly adding a party genre to the genre section.Thanks for that, but SSBB is still a fighting game! GamerPro64 (talk) 19:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a polite warning[edit]

having looked at you prevoius edits on all articles, I have noticed a rather alarming trend of controversial and reverted edits. please stick with concensus and not edge towards edit-warring. if you want to make a drastic change (such as trying to redefine a genre) please discuss it before, don't just go by what you think is true (ie smash bros, pokemon) if you do not, if you end up on the incidents board (which, if you revert brawl again, I will take it to), your lack of democracy will no doubt go against you.

for your own notice, despite concensus being against you, you have made more than five attemps to redefine brawl as something else, also Pokemon's style of play is very close to that of the FF series (particularly the early ones). if you take pokemon off top selling rpg, ff7 has to go too (note my name: im a ff fan but Poke is very similar)

thankyou for listening. hopefully we can move on productively and you can become an important contributer. chocobogamer LOOK AT WHAT I DID 00:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List again[edit]

There has been no conclusion in the talk page to modify Tekken 3 and SSBB in the list. If you do that again, you will be reported as someone pushing his own point of view. If you want to change, promote the discussion in the talk page instead of just changing the article. That the discussion dies is not the same as consensus. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 16:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i've reported him, he's made the edit more than 5 times despite concensus having been reached (it has been - nobody agrees with him) and sources saying that SSBB is a fighter chocobogamer LOOK AT WHAT I DID 18:07, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notification[edit]

Hello, Pé de Chinelo. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CIreland (talk) 18:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFC/USER discussion concerning you (Pé de Chinelo)[edit]

Hello, Pé de Chinelo. Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found by your name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Pé de Chinelo, where you may want to participate. -- MuZemike (talk) 03:11, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Four users signed this within 48 hours, so it is now active. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

shakira links[edit]

about [1], sorry for not leaving a message yesterday on your page, I had to leave the computer at that time.

I explain you, the "see also" secton is regulated by the manual of style section on it, called WP:SEEALSO, which says to link articles on topics related to the subject of the article, and the article White people is not a topic related to Shakira, it's a classification by race. The categorization of persons by race is at Wikipedia:Categorization/Gender,_race_and_sexuality, and she is already at Category:People of Arab descent, which is a subcategory of Category:People_by_ethnic_or_national_descent.

Finally, that the links have been there for a long time does not mean that they can't be incorrect, they can just have been overlooked because nobody familiar with WP:SEEALSO saw them. --Enric Naval (talk) 12:43, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment[edit]

Pé de Chinelo,

You are reminded that a Request for comment for user conduct has already been initiated on you for your obvious NPOV pushing and edit-warring amongst other things. The community insists that you make a response to the actions you have made in an attempt that we may provide resolution for this. If you do not cooperate, or you persist on such behavior, this will be taken to mediation. Thank you, MuZemike (talk) 23:02, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to United States, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to the Administrators' noticeboard[edit]

Hello, Pé de Chinelo. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding your well-documented problematic editing behavior (see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Pé de Chinelo). Thank you. --MuZemike (talk) 21:25, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Blueboy 96 01:45, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's an RFC still out regarding your recent behavior--you'll be unblocked only if you're willing to respond to it and address the concerns raised there. Blueboy 96 01:49, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/201.68.139.235 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Crotchety Old Man (talk) 21:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/201.68.195.208 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Crotchety Old Man (talk) 21:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pé de Chinelo for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Crotchety Old Man (talk) 23:37, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Report[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 17:49, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]