This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ozzykhan.

Welcome!

Hello, Ozzykhan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Dust collection merge[edit]

Just to let you know that I would have supported the merge had I not discovered that the dust collection article is a copyright violation. Luigizanasi 21:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Urdu[edit]

What is the meaning of 'I' and 'We' in Urdu? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.111.159 (talk • contribs) 03:29, 8 August 2006

The same as it is in English! Maybe clarify your question? Ozzykhan 18:23, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

God vs Allah[edit]

Because of your previous interest with regard to the topic, I thought I'd let you know that there is a poll going on at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Islam-related articles)/God vs Allah. It'd be great if you could vote. Thanks! Starwarp2k2 04:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the vote! Although I am not a chicken expert, I remember reading somewhere that the purpose of their talons was not to be a "carnivore" persay. And also, a good guide I personally use in determining whether an not-purely-herbivorous organism is halal or not is the following: if humans were in the wild and had to eat the animal's food(in this case the worm), would the food have to be made halal? I don't think thre is a way to make worms halal, so chickens consuming them is okay. Same theme goes for fish, in my opinion.

As far as classifying them as bacteria though, I disagree. Either way you go, the conclusion of chicken has being halal still stands, right?Starwarp2k2 15:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"More" halal? Largely depends on what type of halal you observe I guess. I'd be very interested in seeing your findings..Thanks!Starwarp2k2 17:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from User Page[edit]

Hello my name is User:Jade Empror72 and you have a nice userpage.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Azad Kashmir; Mudassar Nazar; Ata-ur-Rehman; Nicotine patch; National Bank of Pakistan; List of Pakistani musicians; The Ethiopians; National Stadium, Karachi; Lover/Fighter; Laurel Aitken; Asif Masood; The Pioneers; Chacha Cricket; Khan Mohammad; For Him and the Girls; Gaddafi Stadium; Economy of Pakistan; Rameez Raja; Iqbal Stadium

Cleanup: Muhammad's marriages; James Bourne; Frappuccino
Merge: Islamic fundamentalism; John Prescott; Yusuf
Add Sources: Waqar Younis; Farida Khanum; Jeremy Michael Ward
Wikify: Jeff Mills; Khaleel Ahmed Pakistani; Taekwondo Karate Association of Pakistan
Expand: Lahore Resolution; Chand Raat; Direct Action Day

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:40, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

I don't see why you're fighting so hard for no-name bands. So Chad van whats his name is on the CBC 3 playlist, so? The only reason he has a page is because he (or someone he knows) created it. It's the same with that one. So, a member played for Broken Social Scene, so? That alone should not make a band notable. -- Scorpion 16:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, merge it. I'm only going after bands and if she did play for BSS, then that would make her relatively notable. -- Scorpion 16:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lot (real estate)[edit]

What sort of wikifying do you think should be done to Lot (real estate) ? Dividing it up into sections? H Padleckas 19:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO not a stub[edit]

Hello, Ozykhan, why do you think Černé jezero article is a stub. There are ten (mostly quite long) sentences plus an infobox pretty stuffed with numbers. Also an image and coordinates. IMHO important things regarding the lake have been said or linked to (Operation Neptune). What more should I add there? Thanks in advance for your explanation. --Miaow Miaow 17:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ribbons[edit]

The one on the commons shows up properly. It's just the one here that's blocking it. It's already tagged for deletion. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 18:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its a buffalo not a speedy canditate[edit]

This article was previously marked for speedy and removed, as it does assert notability. Either prod it or take it a AfD if you think it doesn't meet Wikipedia standards 206.126.170.20 18:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1850-51 Australian cricket season[edit]

As they are not identical (or almost identical) recreations, the consensus in the AFD--which was to delete those articles lacking any meaningful content--probably doesn't apply to them. As the creator of the new articles did not participate in the deletion discussion and may thus be unaware of it, I will leave a note on his talk page informing him of the AFD. -- Black Falcon 22:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barry Tebb[edit]

I came across this article as a mis-sorting "People from Leeds" (hadn't got a DEFAULTSORT), but then did quite a bit of cleanup etc on it. I see you added the wikify, cleanup and notable templates- I think it's now OK on all grounds so have removed them. Hope this is OK - not really sure what the protocol for removing templates is, but will "be bold"! PamD 20:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1998-99 Asian Test Championship[edit]

Just rated page check out Talk:1998-99 Asian Test Championship for more info. Monsta666 20:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Australian cricket team in Pakistan[edit]

I think these series need a scorecard for every match. A summary table is also needed for these pages to reach B-class. Monsta666 21:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gilli-danda[edit]

Before I removed it again, I wanted to ask you by what criteria you consider gilli-danda a form of cricket as opposed to a separately evolved, similar game. Take care, mayn —Wiki Wikardo 16:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Steal This movie! movie poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Steal This movie! movie poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Yes Men movie poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Yes Men movie poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Asian TestChampionship 2001-02.GIF[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Asian TestChampionship 2001-02.GIF. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Vique Simba[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Vique Simba, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simba Recordings. Thank you. Optigan13 07:34, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Liberation News (Internationalist)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Liberation News (Internationalist), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Duncan (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Steal This movie! movie poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Steal This movie! movie poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ReveriSoundRevue.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:ReveriSoundRevue.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Reverie Sound Revue EP.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Reverie Sound Revue EP.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chad vangaalen skelliconnection.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Chad vangaalen skelliconnection.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good News![edit]

Good News! Western Panjabi Wikipedia has been created on August 12, 2009.

Category:United Kingdom football derbies[edit]

Category:United Kingdom football derbies, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —WFC— 20:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Asian Test Championship[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Asian Test Championship —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. LionsRule125 (talk) 02:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Ozzykhan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Asian Test Championship has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Asian Test Championship has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]