User talk:Od Mishehu/Archive17

Category:1000 in international relations has been nominated for discussion

Category:1000 in international relations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:42, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Image of Hebrew text in link.png

Thanks for uploading File:Image of Hebrew text in link.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:01, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Subfamilies in Speciesbox

Hi, I thought you might be able to help me with the Speciesbox template. I've been editing articles in the Kingfisher family which is divided into three subfamilies: Alcedininae, Halcyoninae and Cerylinae. I would like the subfamily to be shown in the tax box. Most of the species articles use the Taxobox template but I've come across a few using the Speciesbox template such as Hook-billed kingfisher in the subfamily Halcyoninae. I attempted to display the subfamily by editing Template:Taxonomy/Halcyoninae and adding "|always_display=yes" but this didn't appear to work. Instead I added "|display_parents=2" to the Speciesbox - which worked - but it would be better if the subfamily was displayed automatically without this extra step. Why did my edit to Template:Taxonomy/Halcyoninae fail to display the subfamily? Thanks - Aa77zz (talk) 22:03, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Because when you edit a transcluded template, it takes time until the transcluding pages are updated. There are 2 optios - either wait until the software gets around to updating the species pages, or follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Purge. See also Help:Job queue. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 02:54, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks for your speedy reply - I'll try again. -Aa77zz (talk) 05:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

In general, I find the best way to nensure that my template edits work correctly is to do a null edit on a single affected page, and make sure it works correctly. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:38, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I do urge everyone who changes taxonomy templates to make a null edit like this. It's really helpful in clearing error-tracking categories as well as fixing pages. For example, right now, the taxobox at Gonatopus clavipes is correct, but the page appears in Category:Automatic taxobox cleanup. As soon as I make a null edit on the page, it will disappear from the category. It does help those of us that regularly patrol the error-tracking categories. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Template:Taxonomy/Butorides

Hi, You created Template:Taxonomy/_Butorides, which I moved to a title without the leading space. I forgot that I didn't really want a redirect from the old title. Perhaps you could delete it? Cheers. William Avery (talk) 15:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

NPOV issue

Hi, I'm asking you specifically as an uninvolved editor who seems to have their head screwed on to take a look at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Pentecost. Each year Pentecost goes on the main page when it is celebrated (this year within 24 hours) and I am concerned about a spate of recent edits. I may be over-reacting. I just want outside opinions. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 00:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Agonomycetes

Hi Od_Mishehu, I cant seem to find an taxonomy template for the above. Might be possible I'm looking at it wrongly. scope_creep (talk) 15:01, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

There probably isn't any yet. It can be created at this link. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:29, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:US-river-stub

Template:US-river-stub has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:30, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Category:Template:OscodaCountyMI-geo-stub has been nominated for discussion

Category:Template:OscodaCountyMI-geo-stub, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:55, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Link field in taxonomy templates

Hi, just a reminder that when you create a taxonomy template, like Template:Taxonomy/Gerarda, it's essential that the link does not go to either a disambiguation page or a redirect. If TAXON in |link=TAXON isn't precisely the title of the article as well as the name of the taxon, you must use |link=ARTICLE_TITLE|TAXON. Otherwise various features don't work, including automatic bolding of the article's taxon name in the taxobox. I'm sure you know this; I forget sometimes too. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

I certainly am aware of this; I occasionally make a mistake. If you catch one, no need to tell me - just fix it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:08, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Precious three years!

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:06, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Missing genus parameter in converted taxoboxes

Hi, maybe it's some tool that you're using, but multiple taxoboxes you've been converting to {{Speciesbox}} have ended up with only a tab character in the genus field, e.g. Madarasz's tiger parrot. Could you check what's happening please? Peter coxhead (talk) 14:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

It's my mistake, not the tool's. I'll be more careful. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:17, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Revdel

Sorry, that was my careless mistake. I've reverted myself and will re-read Wikipedia:Revision deletion again. Thanks again. Alex Shih^Talk 07:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Just curious...

This edit is one I've wondered about, and wasn't sure what to do. I initially thought it was overkill to list synonyms, etc. Is that why you reverted? ^{Atsme📞📧} 14:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

I didn't touch the synonyms parameter. The issue is simple: In stead of having every article about a taxon list all the parent taxa, which is extremely redundant and results in major cross-wiki inconsistencies, we have an automatic taxobox system where eachg taxon, fron genus upwards, has aspecial page which defines that taxon. I was siomply migrating this specific page from the old system to the new one. Please see Wikipedia:Automated taxobox system/intro for more details. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Oh, ok - I basically just noticed how the taxobox went from short to long back to short. That same editor covered quite a few articles doing the same thing. I wasn't aware we had a new system. Thank you. ^{Atsme📞📧} 18:09, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up re: New York move discussion

I will take a look, though I am way too busy with work to get involved right now. I appreciate your effort to keep me informed. --Coolcaesar (talk) 06:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for all the tidying-up you are doing on New York categories.

Just a suggestion: where a topic has a category at both state and city level, it's probably more useful to make a category disambiguation page e.g. Category:Architecture in New York, than to delete the redirect. Non-admin editors don't see the deletion log entry (X was moved to Y) and may re-create the simple name. For the same reason, I would have left some of the plain redirects that you have deleted, but this is always a matter of taste.

Keep up the good work! It is appreciated. – Fayenatic London 09:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

There is no reason to keep the redirect revision in the history; and it will be easier for me later (when I make sure I didn't miss anything) if I delete them. It will be fairly simple to get a list of all subcats of Category:New York City with "New York City" in their name; replace the "City" with "(state)", and filter out the redlinks; most of what's left, after trimming the "(state)", will end up getting a category disambig. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:00, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Ah, so you are going to create the disambig pages at the end? Excellent. For me, I usually do that before de-listing the page from CFDW, and I find it helpful to edit the redirect page and convert it to disambig. Each to his own workflow! It sounds as if you have it well in hand, so I'll clear off and let you manage the rest of it your way. (I set up disambig pages for architecture categories already.) – Fayenatic London 07:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

It depends on the size of the workflow. For small category trees, it may make more sense to create the disambiguation pages from the start. For large ones, having many disambiguation pages would interfere with checking that everything was done (I can certainly tolerate a small number of them, and would not have done anything with the root category, Category:New York, other than create a category disambig). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:04, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

New York (state) opposition

Should the opposed New York (state) categories be moved to full discussions? I get the feeling that Djflem is not listening to a word we're saying and is not going to withdraw his opposition. His latest comment is incomprehensible due to spelling and grammar issues; I legitimately can't understand what he's even trying to communicate. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Probably. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:54, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

I'm not extremely familiar with CFD process. Can they be in one bundled nom, since both the move reasoning and the opposition reasoning is largely the same for each? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:09, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

I would probably bundle the "by county" and "by city" into a single nom, as the basic claim for both is the same (if the categories were about NYC, there would be no need for a "by city", and the "by county" would be called "by boroughs" since that's what they're called in the context of the city; probably include anything else containing the word "county"); a separate one for the PATH stations (all of which are in the city, and there may be other opposing users on that basis); and a third one for everything else (the city doesn't have any foos, so "Foos in New York" needs no disambiguation). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Aite here goes. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:25, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Can you have a look at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 July 27 and make sure it all looks proper? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Deleting [X] from New York cats.

Should we delete or redirect with {{Catredirect}} or a standard MediaWiki redirect? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

1. As long as any relevant links exist to these categories, the redirects need to be retained. Relevant links are any links from articls, article drafts, and mainspace categories.
2. Once the categories are empty and the linkes have been updated, they should be deleted.
3. Once I'm done with the New York categories, I intend to double-check that I didn't miss anything (use this tool to get all category names with "New York", use AWB to remove anything with certain contexts for the "New York", and gothrough the list manually - perhaps removing more contexts. Having done that, many of these titles will become {{category disambiguation}}s. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:40, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

If I may offer my 2p-worth here, a category redirect can helpfully be retained if it is liable to be added to an article by an editor. IMHO this does apply to most things in New York. In the absence of an official guideline, I wouldn't say redirects should be retained (except for ASCII to diacritics), but I wouldn't say they should be deleted either. – Fayenatic London 22:47, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Many of these should become category disambguations; however, these would make it impossible for me to be sure that I didn't miss anything. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 02:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Out-of-process renaming of New York categories

Please don't rename New York-related categories out-of-process. If you're in any rush to get specific categories renamed, please use WP:CFDS to list them, where they will generally be processed 48-72 hours later; if you have no rush for a specific category, please wait until I get around to doing it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

O cool. Thanks. I was tidying up after the New York move discussion, but if you're happy to do it, then go for it. Just so I know what still needs to be done (because moves like this often have scraps here and there that need sorting out, and can get left if nobody is picking it up) are you following up on all the residual aspects of the New York move, such as the links in Template:New York (state) for example? Or is there someone else who does that? I don't wish to tread on toes and get a "Please don't" message from anyone else! :-) So, if you could let me know what you are and are not doing, I'm less likely to offend. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 17:49, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

@SilkTork:For now, I'm handling the categories. And the main thing about the categories is that we have a well-designed process for dealing with them, called WP:C2D. If you look at the categories with the "(state)" in their names, you'll see that they went through this process. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:06, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:New York state court judges

I understand the New York category renames in general but renaming Category:New York state court judges to Category:New York (state) state court judges is redundant and awkward, and just doesn't make sense.

I cannot find "this category's entry on the speedy section" to make my point there; it doesn't seem to be listed on the indicated page, based on a text search. TJRC (talk) 19:13, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

You are apparently too late to object to the move; and anyway, you may be interested in knowing that there is also a category called Category:Washington (state) state court judges. As to how redundant the New York category is, consider the fact that this category refers to where the court that this judge works in is located; it is located in some city within the state, and quite likely one city with state judges is New York City. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:35, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to respond. TJRC (talk) 20:36, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

To be more precise: It was processed today at 18:06 UTC, slightly over an hour before you asked mer about it. This was reasonable, since I tagged it 2 days ago at 10:57 UTC and listed it at 11:00 UTC. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:58, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:Faulkner County, Arkansas Registered Historic Place stubs

Thanks for populating Category:Faulkner County, Arkansas Registered Historic Place stubs. I've gone ahead and changed {{FaulknerCountyAR-NRHP-stub}} to add tagged pages to Category:Central Arkansas Registered Historic Place stubs. Is there anything else that needs to be done with regard to the Faulkner County Category to get rid of it? Furicorn (talk) 10:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

• I've gone ahead and marked Category:Faulkner County, Arkansas Registered Historic Place stubs CfD. - Furicorn (talk) 12:00, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Once you've made it clear that you don't mind it getting deletd, and it becomes empty, it can be deleted by an admin - either I'll do it when I get around to it, or it can be tagged with a {{db-g7}} tag to inform other admins. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:01, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

• • Thanks! If you happen to get around to doing it, please note that I've also marked Category:Hot Springs, Arkansas Registered Historic Place stubs {{db-g7}} - Furicorn (talk) 12:09, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Map errors

Some of your recent changes have introduced errors as they changed the name of the map "South Carolina" to one that does not exist "SouthCarolina". I’ve fixed the ones that were being reported as errors, just a heads up so you can fix what I presume is a mis-setting in AWB.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 15:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Please userfy Charles John Eady

and place it in a sub-page of my user page. I intend to improve it using http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/eady-charles-john-6075 and other resources. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 15:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

There's nothing worth using, just the word "hi". עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Pity. I had hoped for more. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 19:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:Phillips County, Arkansas Registered Historic Place stubs and Category:Sebastian County, Arkansas Registered Historic Place stubs

Since these categories only have 39 and 46 stubs, respectively, is the best course of action to delete them, and redirect the templates to upmerge to the appropriate Arkansas region? I can also do the same for Category:Conway County, Arkansas Registered Historic Place stubs. -Furicorn (talk) 08:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

1-second block request

Greetings, Od Mishehu! I'm wondering if you can perform a 1-second block on PalaceGuard008 to note that he previously incurred other blocks under the account User:Sumple (this diff explains the background quite well [1]). Long story short, Sumple was blocked for disruption back in 2007 and supposedly "left the project" on the same day. But as it turned out, he actually created a brand new account "PalaceGuard008" on the very same day as a way to avoid scrutiny and "clean up" his block log. He was called out for this on AN/I and was briefly blocked for his deception, but later unblocked after he agreed to note his old account on his userpage. However, he reneged on this promise mere months later [2]. You don't need to make a subpage or anything like that, but I would greatly appreciate if you could perform a 1-second block on him to make note of his real identity and a dummy entry like you and User:East718 did on mine. Thanks--Certified Gangsta (talk) 00:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

A single block of under 24 hours is, in my opinion, not enough justification for this. You could, of course, ask in a more public location - such as ANI. FYI, the reason I chose to use a subpage for you was to prevent anyone from associating you with a known vandal who later hijacked a couple of your older usernames while still associating you with your older block log which is clearly much more than Sumple's. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I completely agree that a single block of under 24 hours wouldn't justify this under normal circumstances and I appreciate your effort to remind others that I have zero connections with the known vandals who later hijacked my old usernames (probably one of the trolls from WikiProject China). That said, this is a unique situation. Given that he started a new account on the same day he got blocked by community consensus on AN/I (in a blatant attempt to wipe his block log clean), one of the conditions when the Nlu indef block was overturned, based on the consensus on AN/I, was that he needed to stop concealing his identity. He agreed to it, only to quietly reneged on it mere months later when he was no longer under community scrutiny [3]. In my opinion, this is gaming the system and sets a very dangerous precedent. What if a guy does this every time he gets blocked for minor disruption or 3RR violation? It took many months for him to get caught and some people might never get caught. Of course, this is all ancient history and I don't want to re-litigate this on AN/I and waste everybody's time, but I would greatly appreciate your help.--Certified Gangsta (talk) 10:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Interaction Timeline alpha demo is ready for testing

Hello,

The Interaction Timeline alpha version is ready for testing. The Anti-Harassment Tools team appreciates you spending a few minutes to try out the tool and let us know if there is value in displaying the interactions in a vertical timeline instead of the approach used with the existing interaction analysis tools.

Also we interested in learning about which additional functionality or information we should prioritize developing.

Comments can be left on the discussion page here or on meta. Or you can share your ideas by email.

Thank you,

For the Anti-Harassment Tools Team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 21:42, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

ANI Experiences survey

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

• https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

• Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 18:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Od Mishehu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Edit filter false positive reports

Looks like you're active there, so I'll ask you: from looking at your responses there, it seems like, if you see a report by an obvious vandalism-only account, you're blocking them and then noting that in their report. I don't go there much, but when I do, I usually block them and remove the bogus report. Is there a reason to do it one way vs. the other? Or is it personal preference? --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

To be clear, I'm not asking/suggesting you change, I'm asking if there's a reason I don't know about that I should switch the way I'm doing it. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:59, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

At the risk of giving you an annoying edit conflict, let me revise the question. Looking again, it seems like when you go thru the reports and find one from a vandal who has already been blocked by someone else, you're noting "obvious vandalism" instead of just removing the report. Should I be doing that too, or is just deleting the bogus report OK? --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:03, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Personally, unless the report itself is abusive, I prefer answering it over removing it; additionally, if there are reports after it, I may cause someone trying to edit a later report to end up on the edit page for a wrong report - and this should definitely be avoided, especially at a page where a lot of newcomers tend to come to. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Huh?

What on earth is this supposed to mean? Rivertorch^FIRE_WATER 18:48, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

What this means is that an anonymous user attempted to edit your user page, was told by an automated filter that they can't, and reported it. I had no way to know if that person is you, so I said that if it is then you can log in and do the edit and that if not they should leave your page alone. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:06, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Ah, that's more or less what I figured, but the "Page not specified" thing confused me. Does the page suppress certain pages in user space? Rivertorch^FIRE_WATER 17:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

SPecifying the page isn't automatic - it comes either from the reporting user putting it in the proper place on this page, or from some one else filling it in afterwards. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:36, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

I see. Thanks! Rivertorch^FIRE_WATER 14:55, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Slow Worm / Blindworm

Hello Od Mishehu I have no idea how to do edits Etc on Wikipedia, but I saw you last updated the slow worm page, but it is listed as a classification as a reptile when it's actually a amphibian belonging to the amphibia / Caecilian family , since you last updated and know how to could you fix It? Thank you. =) Xeronith (talk) 18:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

I suspect you're confusing it with some other animal. This article is about a member of genus Anguis, which is a genus of lizards. This can be seen on Special:PermanentLink/751026142"the last version of the genus's page from before I touched these articles. I did a google search, which clearly agrees with this classification. Do you have any better sources? עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

User:Hotwiki

Hi there is my name is Vanryoko about there is a problem with this page of List of programs broadcast by GMA Network all shows, name account name Hotwiki because the editing about "Genre" and "Category" they trouble this page is negative page there for only used the Genre called "Drama" and other editing the genre and the "Category" the show since adding but there is a remove the category this page. So please Od Mishehu stop editing List of programs broadcast by GMA Network all shows and program including "Genre" and "Category" for account Hotwiki thanks.

Vanryoko 18:43, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

What are you talking about? First of all, that article you mentioned is in good shape and it doesn't have any problems regarding my edits. Second, you are canvassing, which is a big no no. TheVeryHotWikipedian (talk) 10:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:United Nations non-governmental organizations has been nominated for discussion

Category:United Nations non-governmental organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Special:AbuseFilter/837

Hello! I noticed Special:AbuseFilter/837 is log-only. Are you still using it? We are regularly hitting the condition limit, so I'm trying to disable old filters that are either stale or no longer being monitored. Regards — MusikAnimal ^talk 21:07, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Cancelled projects and events has been nominated for discussion

Category:Cancelled projects and events, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:40, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Interaction Timeline V1.1

Hello Od_Mishehu, I’m following up with you because you previously showed an interest in the Interaction Timeline. The Anti-Harassment Tools team has completed V1.1 and the tool is ready for use. The Interaction Timeline shows a chronologic history for two users on pages where they have both made edits.

The purpose of the tool is to better understand the sequence of edits between two users in order to make a decision about the best way to resolve a user conduct dispute. Here are some test cases that show the results and also some known limitations of the tool. We would like to hear your experience using the tool in real cases. You can leave public feedback on talk page or contact us by email if the case needs discretion or you would prefer to comment privately. SPoore (WMF), Trust & Safety, Community health initiative (talk) 15:57, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

How can the Interaction Timeline be useful in reporting to noticeboards?

Hi Od Mishehu,

The Anti-Harassment Tools team built the Interaction Timeline to make it easier to understand how two people interact and converse across multiple pages on a wiki. The tool shows a chronological list of edits made by two users, only on pages where they have both made edits within the provided time range. Our goals are to assist users to make well informed decisions in incidents of user misconduct and to keep on-wiki discussions civil and focused on evidence.

We're looking to add a feature to the Interaction Timeline that makes it easy to post statistics and information to an on-wiki discussion about user misconduct. We're discussing possible wikitext output on the project talk page, and we invite you to participate! Thank you, For the Anti-Harassment Tools team, SPoore (WMF), Trust & Safety, Community health initiative (talk) 22:33, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Lacy, Texas

I am direct descendant of the Lacy family, my name is Tanya Warren Washington. My grandmother was Libby Lacy Lofton, she was born in Nigton, Texas near Apple Springs in Angelina Country, in EastTexas I believe. Only very recently, I've been made aware of Lacy, Texas in which I'm sure are very direct descendants of my family's family. I was needing from you please any contact information that you may have those persons still residing in the area. Should you desire, please contact me at keilyse21@gmail.com. Thank you so very much for your time and efforts regarding this matter. Be blessed. Tanya Washington (talk) 22:21, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:48, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Od Mishehu. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.@Efrat (talk) 18:07, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Change coming to how certain templates will appear on the mobile web

Hello,

I wanted to share a follow-up to an RfC you participated in from late 2016/early 2017. It was regarding making certain warning templates visible on mobile. The Readers web team has been working to improve how these templates appear on the mobile website. I shared an announcement with communities today that covers what is happening. If you have any interest, I encourage your support in giving feedback on the project page or helping update templates of this nature with some of our recommendations.

Thank you, CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 20:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Od Mishehu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia Manual of Style (Wikipedia content) has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedia Manual of Style (Wikipedia content), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor ^(talk) 21:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Joeymiskulin is at it again

Heads up to anyone who might care to help handle the situation: Joeymiskulin is vandalizing numerous television series articles again after just coming off of a block. I believe he has been blocked twice for this sort of behavior. AlexTheWhovian and I have tried to clean up after him in the past but some help would be nice. I believe you had blocked him in the past so I thought you might take a look at his edit history from the last few hours. Thanks, BoogerD (talk) 04:13, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Od Mishehu AWB! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:15, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

CFD backlog

At WP:CFD there are some 50 discussions more than a month old. Would you be willing to close a number of them? Marcocapelle (talk) 12:46, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Unblock-bot

Template:Unblock-bot has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Top 25

It was a good effort, even if too dry and light on explanations. At least it served to push the final result to the end, and for that I thank you. Feel free to contribute again. igordebraga ≠ 18:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Cfds

Could you re-open the organization cfds you have just closed? The rfc will be open for another 20 days and all the cfds were heading for 'z' in 2 or 3 days. (If the rfc is inconclusive I will have to relist the cfds. If the rfc chooses 'z' it will make no difference other than delay. The rfc is not going to pick 's'.) Oculi (talk) 15:56, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

The RfC won't pick "s" globally, but it may pick "s" in specific regions. And I believe that if an RfC is opened to discuss a general situation, specific examples should wait until its conclusion. For this reason I closed some settlement discussions when the related RfC was started - first handle the general issue, then deal with any specific situation which doesn't already match the result. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

The RfC has closed in favour of 'z' (diff). Perhaps you could close the cfds as 'z' as they were all heading that way as well. Oculi (talk) 11:31, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

As you were. It's re-opened. Oculi (talk) 10:10, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:29, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Editnotices/Page/Bill Ayers

Template:Editnotices/Page/Bill Ayers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DannyS712 (talk) 06:37, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Query

Please contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org at your earliest convenience. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:26, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Od Mishehu. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 11:35, 19 May 2019 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Katie^talk 11:35, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Top 25

Hey, regarding your new template at {{Top 25 Report}}, I think having it as a bulleted list is the wrong approach. Looking at the Talk:Arrow (TV series) list, it makes the top section of the talk page unnessary longer, for a subject that is pretty insignificant to the talk page as a whole. Separating them by commas would work better here. --Gonnym (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

I think this method looks better. I do understand that if the list gets too long it becomes more of a disruption, and if it gets any longer than 5 it gets collapsed (see Talk:Facebook as an example). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Ok. Could you change the color from green to the standard color the talk page templates use? --Gonnym (talk) 13:07, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Did it. How does it look now? עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:13, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Slightly different color than the rest, but much better. Toda! --Gonnym (talk) 13:14, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Feel free to tweek the rgb number if you want. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:15, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

@Od Mishehu: It seems you're slowly walking through history and adding the individual weeks to the talk pages. Is there a reason not to add them all at once? Also, is there a reason not to mark the edits as minor? This would help filter them out from people's watchlists. Thanks. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 04:23, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Your vote at meta:Requests for comment/Global ban for Meister und Margarita

Hi Od Mishehu, I just want to let you know that your vote at this RfC was badly tweaked by this edit and I've tried to fix that. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 15:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

You have email

Hello, Od Mishehu. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

AGK ■ 20:25, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:No deletion link in tag.png

The file File:No deletion link in tag.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CptViraj (📧) 12:07, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Desysopping of Od Mishehu

CheckUser evidence has been presented to the Arbitration Committee indicating that Od Mishehu (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) has disruptively edited Wikipedia while logged out.  The edits appear to be intentional and were detected over a number of occasions.  The Committee has verified that evidence and has been unable to establish a satisfactory or alternative explanation.  The administrator permissions of Od Mishehu are removed under Level II procedures, effective immediately.

• Support: AGK, GorillaWarfare, KrakatoaKatie, Mkdw, Opabinia regalis, Premeditated Chaos, RickinBaltimore, SilkTork, Worm That Turned
• Oppose: Courcelles
• Inactive: Callanecc, Joe Roe

For the Arbitration Committee, AGK ■ 16:45, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Desysopping of Od Mishehu

I have removed your sysop flag, per the ArbCom decision. Thank you for your service. Useight (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

For reference, the above was archived at Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard/Archive_41#Desysopping_of_Od_Mishehu. – Fayenatic London 09:06, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1000 by country

A tag has been placed on Category:1000 by country requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

• I have also blocked your User:Od Mishehu AWB account in line with the block on your main account. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

  @Boing! said Zebedee: There is still another alternative account: User:Od Mishehu archiver. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

  Got that one too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:46, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

  For the record, User:Od Mishehu's non auto-confirmed account and User:Od mishehu are also blocked. – Fayenatic London 21:20, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

  @Boing! said Zebedee and Fayenatic london: And let's not forget about the aptly named Od Mishehu's account for seeing new user's view. ミラP 15:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

CfD

If you have some time left, could you try and close the oldest CfD discussions, see here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcocapelle (talk • contribs) 01:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:Proposed coal-fired power stations in the United States has been nominated for deletion

Category:Proposed coal-fired power stations in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 11:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Category:People declared dead in absentia has been nominated for renaming

Category:People declared dead in absentia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Decade categories

Template:Decade categories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:Ancient Egyptian texts has been nominated for merging

Category:Ancient Egyptian texts has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —⁠andrybak (talk) 22:27, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:California portal selected pictures

A tag has been placed on Category:California portal selected pictures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:California portal selected articles

A tag has been placed on Category:California portal selected articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:California portal selected biographies

A tag has been placed on Category:California portal selected biographies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:58, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Top25

Template:Top25 has been nominated for merging with Template:Top 25 report. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 17:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians interested in Fortaleza Esporte Clube

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians interested in Fortaleza Esporte Clube requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:People from Hawaii (island) has been nominated for merging

Category:People from Hawaii (island) has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. YorkshireLad  ✿  ^(talk) 21:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Fictional robotic insects has been nominated for deletion

Category:Fictional robotic insects has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Max Born

Hi, just a friendly notice that I am recreating this category which you have previously deleted. It was deleted for unrelated reasons (G5), so I do not foresee any problems. Thanks! Footlessmouse (talk) 00:18, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Renaming of category

Please see my proposal to rename several categories including Category:Florida infrastructure to Category:Infrastructure in Florida Hugo999 (talk) 23:15, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Taoists from Northern Ireland

A tag has been placed on Category:Taoists from Northern Ireland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:22, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Taxonomy/Minerva

Template:Taxonomy/Minerva has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:38, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Brazil portal selected content

A tag has been placed on Category:Brazil portal selected content indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Adoptees adopted by relations has been nominated for merging

Category:Adoptees adopted by relations has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 14:23, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:B. R. Ambedkar has been nominated for deletion

Category:B. R. Ambedkar has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:38, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:Non-governmental organizations with consultative status at the United Nations has been nominated for listification

Category:Non-governmental organizations with consultative status at the United Nations has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Archiveline

Template:Archiveline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Terasail^[✉️] 21:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Category:Zen Buddhists from Northern Ireland has been nominated for merging

Category:Zen Buddhists from Northern Ireland has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 16:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:Architecture of the Philppines has been nominated for renaming

Category:Architecture of the Philppines has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Unblock-bot

Template:Unblock-bot has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 23:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Scientist types from Boo

Template:Scientist types from Boo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Locomotive manufacturers of Hungary

A tag has been placed on Category:Locomotive manufacturers of Hungary indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 17:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Category:NASCAR races at Phoenix International Raceway has been nominated for renaming

Category:NASCAR races at Phoenix International Raceway has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nascar9919 (talk) 05:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Welcomeen-he/doc

Template:Welcomeen-he/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Taxonomy/Aeluroscalabotinae

Template:Taxonomy/Aeluroscalabotinae has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Category:NASCAR races at Dover International Speedway has been nominated for renaming

Category:NASCAR races at Dover International Speedway has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nascar9919 (talk) 05:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:Ancient Egyptian texts has been nominated for merging

Category:Ancient Egyptian texts has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 23:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Apluod 5.122.155.227 (talk) 16:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

"Bynner Street" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bynner Street has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Bynner Street until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

"Carolina Avenue" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Carolina Avenue has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Carolina Avenue until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

"Child Street" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Child Street has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Child Street until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

"Lakeville Road" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Lakeville Road has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Lakeville Road until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

"Moraine Street" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Moraine Street has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Moraine Street until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

"Perkins Street" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Perkins Street has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Perkins Street until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)