User talk:Obook1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Obook1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cognitive Information Processing Shell, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JMHamo (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cognitive Information Processing Shell[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cognitive Information Processing Shell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JMHamo (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cognitive Information Processing Shell[edit]

Hello Obook1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cognitive Information Processing Shell for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 17:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

You may not copy into Wikipedia material that is found elsewhere on the Internet, as this is a copyright violation. Additionally, your edits have been promotional, which is also disallowed. It has now been twice been necessary to delete material you have done this with. If you violate copyright or post promotional material once again, you will be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:39, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cognitive Information Processing (CIP) Shell[edit]

Hello, Obook1. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Cognitive Information Processing (CIP) Shell, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:38, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Sundaraja Sitharama Iyengar. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:50, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:50, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Obook1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my behavior is not appropriate and in fact I could get the permission. I have carefully read the copyright policy and the policies of non-free content, so I apply to unblocked and I will edit pages get the permission and according to the copyright policyObook1 (talk) 14:35, 6 December 2018 (UTC). Obook1 (talk) 14:35, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please briefly explain the copyright policy in your own words, to demonstrate your understanding of it. 331dot (talk) 14:57, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Obook1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Copyright is about the legal right for it's owner to publish the work; protect the completing and modify published works; obtain money from other people's use. If those item is violated, the author could ask for stop violation and pay for the violated. * The contributor should follow: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License， GNU Free Documentation License. * It could cause both a copyright violation and plagiarism. * The content should follow a compatible license, in the table of ``License Compatibility with Wikipedia ; My own work need to be under the compatible license to be allow to copy. Little change of the text is also not allowed. Copy form other content of Wikipedia (must link to source) is allowed. * Observe the four points above, follow the requirement about copyright and license! get permission from author for images. Obook1 (talk) 16:46, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not accurate. In particular, you do not understand WP:FAIRUSE. Yamla (talk) 15:17, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.