User talk:Nuclear Dragon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I made a mistake.[edit]

i accidentally screwed over a page and know i feel guilty. there's a article called Uranus(Mythology) i wanted to had more information to the infobox so i edited typed in Mesopatampian equivalent Anu in the infobox and it destroyed the infobox, im deeply sorry for this accident. Nuclear Dragon (talk) 00:11, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind i fixed it Nuclear Dragon (talk) 00:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question.[edit]

I was editing the wikipedia page on the Greek God Uranus i was trying to had an equivalent god in another mythology Anu to the infobox just like someone has added Caelus the Roman Equivalent of Uranus to the infobox, i added to the code in the infobox but it dosen't show up visually, how do i change that? Nuclear Dragon (talk) 00:36, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have already fixed it. Wikipedia (unfortunately) does not seem to have an infobox parameter for "Mesopotamian equivalent," so you have to use the custom equivalent parameter, which is a bit more complicated. Also, I thought I would point out for future reference that you misspelled the word "Mesopotamian." --Katolophyromai (talk) 04:31, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. Nuclear Dragon (talk) 04:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Im wondering?[edit]

im messing around in the sandbox thingy? and im wondering how i put one of those big word pop up thing's that have arrow's on the side that when you touch show you more stuff. Nuclear Dragon (talk) 21:36, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean a template like the one below? Those are actually separate from the articles. You can add them to articles by writing the name of the template inside of a double loopy bracket like this: {{insert name of template here}}. --Katolophyromai (talk) 23:35, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How to create paramter on an infobox[edit]

How do you create a custom parameter on an infobox Nuclear Dragon (talk) 21:48, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For a custom "equivalent," you have to add this: | equivalent1_type = insert whatever type you want here | equivalent1 = insert the name of the equivalent deity here --Katolophyromai (talk) 23:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nuclear Dragon (talk) 23:33, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where exactly do i type this? Nuclear Dragon (talk) 23:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You would type it inside the infobox, usually towards the bottom of it. --Katolophyromai (talk) 01:32, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I typed into field information it didin't work there? Nuclear Dragon (talk) 01:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

i made a mistake again[edit]

i was editing the article on Brahma and all of the sudden the infobox diseapeared, if anyone know's how to fix it then they need to. Nuclear Dragon (talk) 03:52, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it by reverting back to the revision before you edited the page. You made several mistakes; I am not sure what all of them are because I am not actually an expert on infoboxes, but one of them was that you copied the "nowiki" tags from my instructions above. Those were not actually part of what I was writing and they were only there so that the signals would show up as bare wikitext. In any case, infoboxes are extremely fragile and you may want to avoid editing them until you understand how they work. (Honestly, I avoid editing them most of the time.) I recommend reading WP:INFOBOX, which should hopefully explain how to use them properly. --Katolophyromai (talk) 04:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, sometimes i can edit infoboxes without a scratch other times they just go out of whack i don't actually remember why i typed in the no wiki tags, i also put dozens of names in the infobox, i just need to handle it more carefully next time. Nuclear Dragon (talk) 04:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lulus (December 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Iulus instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Nuclear Dragon, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the one who declined it? Nuclear Dragon (talk) 17:49, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway no matter who declined it idon't see how there was any good reason to take it down, Lulus and Ascanius aren't necessarily the same person although they can be seen that way, maybe i need a citation for that? Lulus was said to be the ancestor of the Caesar's in Julius Caesar article rather than Ascanius does that need to be taken down to? Nuclear Dragon (talk) 17:56, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And i have a citation to!? Nuclear Dragon (talk) 17:58, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Curb Safe Charmer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Christ myth theory, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:34, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can respect that. Nuclear Dragon (talk) 17:51, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lulus (January 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Iulus instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I still maintain that the existing article should be added to, as there cannot be two articles with the same name in the encyclopedia. You can explain the controversy over whether they are one and the same in that article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:39, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cynric, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Creoda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 22:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Caution: January 2018[edit]

We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions.

Welcome to wikipedia. Please do not add unsourced content in infoboxes or to articles. Please review WP:V and WP:RS guidelines for further information. Your cooperation is requested, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 22:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about me editing Brahma and Indra earlier today? if so, where would i put sources for what i put in the infobox? Nuclear Dragon (talk) 01:19, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
After each comma or full stop, like this,[1] and this.[2] Please make sure that it is a peer reviewed source, no blogs nor websites nor newspapers nor other questionable sources (see WP:RS). Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Use:
<ref>{{cite book|author= Author One|title= Peer reviewed publication 1|page= 19|publisher= Oxford University Press|year= 2010|isbn= |url= }}</ref>
Please see WP:CITEHOW for more help.

References

  1. ^ Author One (2010). Peer reviewed publication 1. Oxford University Press. p. 19. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  2. ^ Author Two (2012). Peer reviewed publication 2. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 29. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)
what did i do? Nuclear Dragon (talk) 20:31, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This, this, this, etc over the last few weeks. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 07:59, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the children area of the infobox was deleted by an editor if you did that i don't appreciate do to it including correct information because the 10 prajapatis are children of Brahma and so is Daksha i will edit it back but i wont include laskhmi and Saraswati if that is what you took problem with. Nuclear Dragon (talk) 08:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear Dragon: Unsourced content is the problem! Wikipedia is not a personal blog or a place to share what you feel or know. A core pillar of Wikipedia is verifiability in published reliable sources. Please do not add anything to that infobox or the article without reliable sources. Typically what is added in the infobox is discussed in the main article, or has a source at least in the main article. Another editor has already cautioned you about this, above. If you do not understand what is stated in the content guideline page links above, please visit WP:TEAHOUSE for assistance. Your cooperation is requested, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:26, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How to you add links to sources if your using the infobox Nuclear Dragon (talk) 21:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

both the daksha and marichi articles state brahma is their father with no citation, why isn't anyone going after the people who edited those articles? Nuclear Dragon (talk) 21:58, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can go ahead and tag those statements as needing a citation. See WP:CITENEED to learn how. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I recently added a citation to the Brahma article Nuclear Dragon (talk) 06:13, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nuclear_Dragon&oldid=823598170"