User talk:Novadogg

Welcome...

Hello, Novadogg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Mario1987 20:08, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Davis[edit]

Sorry about that. I actually didn't look at the image description pages. I just assumed they were fair use images. hbdragon88 22:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Air Force[edit]

I don't question that "hell of a roar" is the official phraseology, and always has been, even when the final line was "nothing can stop the Army Air Corps" (which actually rhymes with "roar", you'll notice). But for decades, the versions sung in larger public settings (such as radio and TV and recordings) substituted "terrible roar", as an apparently approved alternative. (The Mormon Tabernacle Choir version, on their album of patriotic songs, is a good example). Language has gotten a lot freer since things started to change in the late 1960s, and for example, when Jay Leno has one of his military-in-the-audience shows, they sing "hell of a roar". However, I think it's safe to say that they still sing "terrible roar" when teaching school-age kids this song (assuming they still teach them patriotic songs in school). Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 02:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

I nominated File:AndreaDavis2.jpg as a copyright violation and File:Olelo 1.JPG as lacking a source. I also nominated File:JW.jpg for deletion. Regards. Hekerui (talk) 16:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mrs. Pacific Islands has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Proposed deletion of Mrs. Pacific Islands[edit]

The article Mrs. Pacific Islands has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Proposing deletion under the following criteria: Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rl1573r (talk) 04:02, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]