User talk:NotAsian

Welcome!

Hello, NotAsian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Talk:CNN. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 04:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please see WP:NOTFORUM. Your comment makes little sense and does not discuss article improvement. Drmies (talk) 04:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

I disagree it was vandalism, who can I complain to.

I believe what you did is vandalism. NotAsian (talk) 04:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Hmm. I suppose you could file a report at WP:AN, to complain about me, but if you want to do that you should probably stay away from Talk:CNN because if you don't I'll block you and then you can't file a report. Good luck, Drmies (talk) 04:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

I still disagree it was vandalism but you were correct my proposal falls into the category of no original research, so there is no point in complaining since it could be considered vandalism if user intent is unknown.

I corrected the closed window not sure if thats the correct thing to do.

NotAsian (talk) 04:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, but it wasn't original research, it was a forum post, and you can't go around usurping other people's signatures. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 04:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

O sorry I don't really know what I am doing I thought that was correct editing.

Is there anyway to use the rules to get information that a reliable source has not reported on to be published? For example some of the physics pages lack information that is within my textbooks but the textbooks are not a reliable source they are just a source(Just checked the textbooks are a reliable source). It seems that applying the scientific method would enable non-reliable sources information to be used and for false information to be semi-permanently (technically there's always the chance the falsification could be falsified) prevented from being added.

NotAsian (talk) 05:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

This is why we have collaborative editing, and why more editors is better than fewer editors--more editors with many skills. Drmies (talk) 05:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)