User talk:Nodulation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Nodulation, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Darwinek (talk) 23:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amborella[edit]

Eliminating interwiki links from an article is neither a "minor" edit nor is it desirable. Please leave interwiki links in articles, as they are important for cross-language collaboration. --EncycloPetey (talk) 03:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed almost all interwiki links in order to solve the conflict, thus the edit is desirable. Leaving a conflict prevent the bot to maintain the interlanguage links. Besides, the edits of interwiki links that are done by bots are marked minor, and my edit did not change the content of the article. Nodulation (talk) 04:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Amborella. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --EncycloPetey (talk) 04:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why my edit appear to constitute vandlism. Leaving a conflict of interwiki links does not seem a good idea to me. Nodulation (talk) 04:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are removing valid interwiki links after being asked not to do so. That appears to constitute vandalism. There is no interwiki conflict. --EncycloPetey (talk) 04:28, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Because articles about Amborella trichopoda, Amborellaceae, Amborellales and Amborella are linked by the english article, I don't think that the interwiki are valid. Here is an example of interwiki conflict : en:Amborella > fr:Amborella trichopoda, and en:Amborella > vi:Amborellales > fr:Amborellales.
I don't understand why you have protected the article. My two edits are different, I have tried to improve the situation. Nodulation (talk) 05:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you think this is a conflict? It isn't. The English article is about the species Amborella trichopoda; it is also about the genus, the family, and the order. There is only one species involved. If there is a fork on the French Wikipedia, then you should propose a merger there, not eliminate links here. --EncycloPetey (talk) 02:26, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is a conflict because the bots cannot automatically update the interwiki links. Moreover, there is no reason that the other Wikipedias have to follow the English Wikipedia, the interwiki links have just to be conform to the state of all Wikipedias. As I said, the fork on the French Wikipedia is just an example, there is plenty of these:
Thus, I propose to link the English article to the 'Amborellaceae' set, as I did in my second edit that you have reverted. For sure, some links will be removed, but some other links will be updated, and the conflict will be solved. Nodulation (talk) 15:29, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That removes important links to information on other wikis. The bots shouls not take priority over the users. The bots should exist to assist the users. Your proposal hurts the users in order to help the bots, which is wrong. The information on the English Wikipedia is not just about the family or the order; it is about the species and the higher taxa. Removing the links destroys access to information. --EncycloPetey (talk) 05:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Nodulation. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Nodulation. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Nodulation. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nodulation&oldid=869712824"