User talk:Nkcs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for the corrections[edit]

I'm new wikipedian, so thanks for the corrections :) --Yosy

Thanks again for the help mate :) --Yosy

Re: Argentine universities[edit]

Thanks! =D --OneEuropeanHeart 21:17, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you recall where you got this image from?

It's probably public domain, since it's so old, but we still need some kind of a source to keep the image on the Commons.

thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 07:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. Man, I searched the internet for ages trying to find it. :)
Do you know which page exactly you saw the image on? (Rather than the exact URL of the image itself)
Also this kind of information should be put on the image page itself, when you upload, even for fair use images. Which I really doubt this is. But anyway, thanks again, I'm really grateful! pfctdayelise (translate?) 03:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SICOFAA[edit]

Very nice reformatting! ekrub-ntyh talk 13:46, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of the Falklands issue[edit]

Hi! I have to say that, while the two other editors should not have deleted the information on the Argentine flag, least of all calling it "vandalism" and without discussion, the watchers of the page do have some points. I have no basis to tell which version of the article is wrong. In any case, me being an Argentinian would probably be a liability if I entered the discussion. Sorry... —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 13:44, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nk, I'd rather see some discussions in the Talk page before engaging in a revert war or protection war. I may join the discussion, but I saw none going on on the page. Sebastian Kessel Talk 16:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on all slowly on this list: Wikipedia:WikiProject Countries/Templates/Navboxes feel free to assist. :)

Meanwhile mind if I revert that template?

--Cat out 12:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OMG =) Of course you can change the template, but please note that some pages, like Falkland Islands, use <div class="BoxMerge"> for its templates. IMO it's better to delete all those parameters from the articles before doing any changes, but again, proceed at your own will. =) Cheers. --Nkcs 12:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly does boxmerge do? I haven't seen it do anything :/ --Cat out 14:06, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The idea's from the German Wiki. It literally "merges" the templates into an only box; the problem is that all of them must follow the same layout, or at least a very similar one. IMO it gives a nice impression of professionalism, but of course it's not really necessary. --Nkcs 23:24, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... Looks redundent to me since they "merge" either way. :) --Cat out 01:12, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps. But take a look at the websites of, e.g., University of Western Australia. It's only for beauty's sake, but c'mon, doesn't look nice? =) Cheers. PS: I've added some translations on User:Cool Cat/In many languages.... You're welcome. =) --Nkcs 04:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ah! The working example!
Yes that does look nicer. I am thinking of ways to incorporate that at a broader scale.
--Cat out 05:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, I noticed that you and I seem to post in one or two articles dealing with progressive issues in political science/sociology. There's currently a debate beginning in Boston Tea Party as to whether the article should include the category [1]. It meets definitions set in the articles Terrorism and Definition of terrorism, however, there are several self-proclaimed patriots who watch BTP who refuse to recognise the fact. The simple criteria for terrorism generally seem to be intimidation or destruction of property in order to change public policy or public opinion while a state of war has not yet been declared. Some users would rather use recent acts of terrorism as a yardstick, rather than using a firm definition, and hence lose their ability to discuss matters calmly. Would you be able to pop in to the Talk page and join in the discussion? Thanks much, samwaltz 05:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the numerous tweaks --Cat out 14:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Latin-American Wikipedia Meeting[edit]

"Latin-American Wikipedians,unite us!"
Latin America:one world,one dream!!

Hi wikipedian!Today I'm going to talk you about a new proposal that can to advantage you and many other users of Latin America.

You,that is from Latin America (second your userbox),already shall to have observed the importance of the Wikimedia Frojects in the region.Only Wikipedia represent 40% of the internet access[1].With every this importance,why don't we make a big meeting?

Of this idea,was borned the proposal for a Latin-American Wikipedian Meeting.Various Wikipedists has Latin-American users and this is a proposal of a culture and ideas interchange,that can be help all projects.Above this,comtemplate to help in the formation of new WMF chapters in Latin America.

The main page and the talk page is originally in English,with translations in Dutch,French,Portuguese and Spanish(NOT YET).

Tosão (talk) 22:27, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Nkcs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Alexf(talk) 16:41, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Nkcs", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website which relates to the entity in question, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or accounts that are shared. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our Conflict of interest guideline and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 16:42, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Peridon (talk) 16:59, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was very surprised when I saw how long you had been here after deleting your userpage for being blatant advertising. Peridon (talk) 17:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Nkcs, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

  1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
  3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.
If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 14:09, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Venezuela FBL 01.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Venezuela FBL 01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]