User talk:Njr75003

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 21:03, July 13, 2005 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:MeredithMonk.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:MeredithMonk.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Game$how Marathon[edit]

If you did not not know, TV show articles on Wikipedia do not censor/withhold episode summaries "to spoil the outcomes for episodes until it has aired in all time zones", "the summary will be posted as 12:01 am", or similar messages. Since this is a wiki, you have to let other users edit this page who may wish to. If we did have such a policy or guideline, there would have a major fuss over on other popular shows such as American Idol or 24 (TV series). Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did not realize that. Thanks for the heads-up. Still, it usually takes me that long to properly recap the episode anyway (at least, it did for TPIR), so in my case, anyway, I'll hold to the self-inflicted deadline. If anyone ELSE posts an evening's summary before I do, so be it. njr75003 04:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- If you feel you want to wait until after 12am, be my guest. As I mentioned, whenever an episode of a popular show such as American Idol or 24 ends on the East coast, some of those rabid fans start adding in the summaries to the articles. That is why templates like {{in-progress tvshow}} and {{spoiler}} were created. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Nick With WOF Wheel.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Nick With WOF Wheel.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Your Edit to Magical objects in Harry Potter[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for correcting spelling on Wikipedia! However, both spellings of the word you "corrected" are acceptable.

Please familiarize yourself with American and British English spelling differences before making further spelling corrections to articles. Wikipedia has 47,332,663 registered users on this English Wikipedia. These editors use different versions of English including American English and British English. The list of dialects of the English language goes on and on.

When many styles are acceptable, avoid changing from one style to another unless there is some substantial reason for the change. It is acceptable to change from American spelling to British spelling only if the article concerns a British topic or vice versa or if you are making the article internally consistent.

More information is available at Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Enjoy your time on our encyclopædia/encyclopedia. Thank you.
John Reaves 04:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:MonopolyMegaEditionElements.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:MonopolyMegaEditionElements.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TOSMonopoly1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TOSMonopoly1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 14:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:SnoopysReunion03a.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SnoopysReunion03a.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:22, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:SnoopysReunion03a.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SnoopysReunion03a.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 01:17, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:SnoopysReunion01.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SnoopysReunion01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 01:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FeudUSLogos.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:FeudUSLogos.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:10, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ida Siconolfi[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Ida Siconolfi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. ▪◦▪≡ЅiREX≡^Talk 04:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FeudUSLogos.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:FeudUSLogos.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:02, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is NOT my image. I did not create this image, nor did I add it to either Wikipedia in general OR the FAMILY FEUD article in particular. I do not know WHO created this graphic, nor do I know who decided to add it under my name. njr75003 02:48, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Monopoly (game), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. Gscshoyru 02:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference from the Hasbro.com website added. The game IS NOW AVAILABLE in many U.S. retail outlets, including K-Mart, Wal-Mart, Target and Toys'R'Us. I have personally seen the game available AND read the updated rules, which include the modifications included in my article addition. njr75003 02:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Stephanie Courtney[edit]

A tag has been placed on Stephanie Courtney, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 21:04, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Wheel Season 26 Actual.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Wheel Season 26 Actual.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:WOFArcade.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:WOFArcade.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Chez Geek, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 16:12, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi Nick, I've noticed your edits to Star Trek: New Voyages and James Cawley. I will not edit those articles, as I may be seen to have a conflict of interests (see my userpage), but I did want to point out that you've added information not covered in any cite (and I should know, since almost all such eventually trace back to me). For instance, Buck: "~~produced or~~ released" - heck, I've even got scenes released through various outlets (Trekmovie, YouTube, etc). Or "The Protracted Man"--now retitled "Origins" - it's the other way around (Origins was our working title), as verifiable to various RS's out there, also which return to information I've written and/or released. I'd also suggest double-checking the VFX credits for Enemy Starfleet. Best, Rob ROBERTMFROMLI | ^TK/_CN 19:58, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Note: Not sure how aware you are of RS guidelines, so if you know this, apologies. You cannot use anything I say on Wikipedia as an RS, even if I've said or released the information elsewhere - it can only be cited externally on RS's, even if it still points to me there. Best, ROBERTMFROMLI | ^TK/_CN 20:04, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Batman: Cacophony, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Dark Knight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. it's fixed. njr75003 (talk) 01:41, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Smith edits[edit]

Hey man, I've seen some of the edits you're making on the Kevin Smith pages. I just wanted to let you know why I reverted or followed up on some of your edits so you don't think I'm just going behind you undoing a bunch of stuff you did. I removed the DVD chapter/easter egg stuff from the Q&A pages, because Wikipedia isn't an indiscriminate collection of information. Articles are meant to provide a decently thorough summary of a topic, and in-depth specifics like DVD chapters and easter eggs are left to other sites. For instance, since we don't put DVD chapters on the article for Magnolia (film or Gangs of New York, there's no reason to include it on the Q&A pages. Keep up the good work! Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 15:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Star Trek: Phase II (fan series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Paramount (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Mewes[edit]

Hi. Regarding your recent message to me, in which you state:

Next time, before you dismiss an edit, please watch the source material FIRST. Go to the "Jay and Silent Bob" entry here to see the info on SUPER GROOVY CARTOON MOVIE. And if you read the credits for SPOILERS, you will see this: http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/2364/spoilersjasonmewescredi.jpg I wouldn't be adding this information if it wasn't (a) salient or (b) confirmed. njr75003 (talk) 21:52, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Let's get one thing perfectly straight:

I don't have to watch the source material. YOU do. You wanna add material to Wikipedia, then you have to add the citations that support it. When the citation in question is an episode of a TV series or Web series, then you have to cite the episode or episodes in question. You didn't do that. You merely cited the main page for Spoilers on Hulu. That is NOT a citation. It makes no mention of Mewes, nor his jobs on the show. Similarly, "Kevin Smith: Live from Behind podcast" is not a valid citation either, because it does not provide a reader with enough information with which he/she can verify the material, as per WP:Verifiability. It is that policy that is the relevant one at hand, and not your arbitrary and dogmatic statements as to what is "confirmed". You might also want to reconsider presuming to tell far more experienced editors and administrators what proper editing procedure is, given that you've racked up about 1,237 edits since 2005.

Similarly, I do not have to go looking to another Wikipedia article. One Wikipedia article cannot be cited as a source in another, since that violates WP:CIRCULAR. That being said, I did look in the Jay and Silent Bob article. You'd know this, if you actually bothered looking more closely at that article's edit history (which is kinda similar, you know, to what you accused me of doing), because if you had, you'd have seen that I removed that material from that article too for the same aforementioned reason.

Now you might be thinking, "Wait, how do I cite an episode? I don't know how to do that!" Well, you could've done some checking, or asked around, or hell, maybe even just asked me, since I'm happy to help less-experienced editors, as it says at the top of my user page. But even if you put those solutions aside, there's another pretty obvious way you could've learned how to cite an episode:

You might've looked at my edits a bit more closely (again, kinda what you accused me of) and saw that I myself cited an episode of Spoilers in order to support Mewes' job as Executive Producer on that show. Y'know, that episode citation that you REMOVED in your last edit? See it now? In the left hand side of the page showing the difference between the page before and after your removed my citation, and replaced with your inane citation of the Hulu main page for the show? Yeah, that's right, my friend. I actually did watch the first two episodes of Spoilers (why you assumed I didn't, I don't know), despite the fact that I wasn't required to, and cited the premiere for the Exec Producer credit.

Now maybe instead of attacking me as you did on my talk page for not seeing that Stage Manager credit, you could've considered all this, and just maybe, contacted me by saying, "Hey, thanks for adding that episode cite for the Exec Producer credit! But in case you missed it, this episode here supports the Stage Manager credit too!". Now I'm sorry I missed that portion of the credits. With the all the cleaning up I do of poorly-written messes left by people like you who don't care about following this site's policies or exhibiting half-intelligble writing (newsflash: the word dependent is not spelled dependant, and we do not refer to subjects by their given names), I miss things sometimes. But if you'd like to inform me of which episode that was, and in a polite tone, then do so, and I'll add that info. Similarly, if you can find a valid cite for the animated film, I'll restore that too. Until then, take care. Nightscream (talk) 22:38, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: I viewed the entire podcast episode to verify the material you added to the Substance abuse section, and reviewed the portion you specified near the one hour mark twice. It makes no mention of when his last relapse occurred, the year, when it was in relation to his marriage, wife's actions, etc. Again, adding such unsourced material is a violation of WP:V and WP:NOR. Please make sure that the sources you cite support the material. Thanks again. Nightscream (talk) 01:38, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pawn Stars[edit]

Hi. Just so you know, the citation you included with the material you added to Pawn Stars, which is labeled a Fox News story, is an image at suicidegirls.com. I'm guessing this was a mistake on your part, because I found the actual Fox News story by Googling the citation title. Just thought you should know. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 12:15, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY: This was a mistake on my part. I was chatting with someone about the subject, found the original article, then was asked how much did Olivia show in these pictorals. I then searched for any pictures of her from the SG website and found the image I inadvertantly posted. I thought I still had the Fox News article's address in memory rather than the photo. I apologize profusely, and will try NOT to screw up like that in the future. Thx, Nightscream. njr75003 (talk) 05:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hollywood Babble-On, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Long Beach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 23 December[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Fluxx page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Match Game, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guy de Maupassant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rewrapped, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hostess. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Njr75003. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Njr75003. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Max Headroom (character), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page When the Sun Goes Down (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Njr75003. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Devin Goda moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Devin Goda, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 11:13, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:22, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Devin Goda[edit]

Hello, Njr75003. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Devin Goda".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:19, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Best Thing I Ever Ate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Smith. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Good Eats, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chopped.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Dish (TV series)[edit]

The article The Dish (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sourcing found. As a clip show of other shows' content, it is not notable on its own

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Star Trek, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:05, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flashpoint (Elseworlds) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flashpoint (Elseworlds), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flashpoint (Elseworlds) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]