User talk:Nick the doc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nick the doc, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Nick the doc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 02:14, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Nick the doc, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Snowysusan (talk) 10:06, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

In response to your feedback[edit]

Giving you a hand with the headings... You appear to have used incorrect syntax, hopefully I fixed it. Also, don't reference to other articles inside Wikipedia - the point of a reference is to refer to a reputable source. Wikipedia can't source itself! (I also put this message in the description of the edit I made to your new article)

Personally, I think a good way of getting used to the syntax is to read some guides to editing ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tutorial and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents ) and also start by only fixing some grammar and spelling in articles as you come across them. That was a good way for me to learn about syntax.

BurritoBazooka (talk) 17:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

further advice[edit]

C Matthew is probably notable, but this needs to be shown according to WP:AUTHOR. What will do it is information about all published reviews for the books, in 3rd party reliable sources, the more impressive the better. Then treat the radio plays and shows similarly: find reviews of them, and give references to them, and for the best, a short quotation of no more than one sentence. Man of these were before the internet era, but print is OK also. If you write it correctly, there may be a good chance of acceptance. If you like, tell me on my talk p. that you've revised it sufficiently, and I will have a look. See WP:FIRST, and our pages on other authors. DGG ( talk ) 04:28, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Matthew[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Christopher Matthew, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Basket Feudalist 21:04, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tenth time lucky eh bro! Congrats Basket Feudalist 21:08, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]