User talk:Nice4wut

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disambiguation link notification for April 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black on Both Sides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Finch. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tupac[edit]

Hi, I saw that you have removed songwriter in Tupac's lead. I put it back on because it's a considerable occupation of his. Please do not remove it. Pier1999 (talk) 22:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Music of Grand Theft Auto V, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darren Cullen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tupac songwriter on the lead of article[edit]

Other artists who wrote their own songs do not have songwriter as a listed occupation. Either uniformity across Wikipedia or it needs to be removed here. Please explain why it needs to be on Tupac's article in particular. Darrencdm1988 (talk) 23:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The guy two topics above you told me it should be there Nice4wut (talk) 08:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please undo[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hood_Hottest_Princess&diff=next&oldid=1217331024 per MOS:VAR, MOS:RETAIN, and WP:ALBUMSTYLE. See on the talk page how this has been discussed multiple times. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 23:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 09:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Ponyobons mots 17:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nice4wut (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have not done any disruptive edits on this account (apart from the disagreements about Hood's Hottest Princess and 2Pac, both of whom I reverted). I was blocked for not citing sources, but I've made sure to do that this time. I just need a second chance brooo plzzzzz people can change. Why'd you have to delete E. Coli (song) i was so proud of that article :( I used a bunch of reliable sources too, I can't even view the source code anywhere ;(((

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.