User talk:NewComVIc

Welcome![edit]

Hello, NewComVIc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! bd2412 T 14:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked about Brett Rossi at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography#Draft:Brett Rossi. Cheers! bd2412 T 14:06, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Dani Daniels. Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 18:55, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What information are you refering toNewComVIc (talk) 18:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SHe is my Fiancee so I am pretty sure I would know her real name. Here are at least two links showing it http://xxxbios.com/female-pornstar/dani-daniels-biography/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mv2rNbByzd0 http://www.xbiz.com/news/221154 can you please put that edit back. We are having a significant problem with people catfishing her and using different names. NewComVIc (talk) 19:10, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit was unsourced, hence unverifiable and a violation of our policy concerning biographies of living persons. None of the sources you specified above are known to be reliable sources for biographical information. General Ization ^Talk 19:25, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, NewComVIc. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Dani Daniels, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 08:56, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Dani Daniels[edit]

Hello. Stop adding links to her Twitter-account, Instagram etc to the article. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a fanblog, and the rules that apply here (see WP:ELNO) clearly state that the only link that belongs in the article is to the subject's official website (and there is such a link, to danidaniels.com, in the infobox), not links to social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram etc, which is why they are repeatedly being removed. Claiming to be her fiancé, as you do, also doesn't give you special rights to add material to the article, as you seem to believe, quite the opposite, since per Wikipedia's rules regarding conflict of interest people close the subject of an article shouldn't edit the article at all, only propose changes on the talk page of the article (Talk:Dani Daniels), and then let other editors decide whether the material should be aded or not. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 08:57, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]