User talk:Neoballmon II
Hi. Welcome to my talk page. I guess I'll get the ball rolling here.
Hi, I'm Rick, and I'm a grape-a-holic. Any time there's a grape around, I can't leave it there. I have to eat it. I could eat grapes for hours if given the chance.
March 2007[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Wirreanda High School, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipedia is not the place to air your grievances about your school, nor is it the place for Original Research. If the statements you made are true, please try and find a newspaper article which states this and reference it. Chris B 12:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Dara Robinson[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dara Robinson, by Tony Sidaway (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dara Robinson seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dara Robinson, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Ranchester, Wyoming[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ranchester, Wyoming. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nyttend 13:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Blocked[edit]
Neoballmon II (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I think it's unfair to say that I am guilty of sock-puppetting. I have a genuine phobia of sock puppets, and I wouldn't ever go near them. They're just freaky! Socks should never have mouths. And I don't believe this account is technically a sock puppet? Isn't sock puppetting having 2 active accounts to have arguments with yourself and do things discretely. And if someone wanted to sock-puppet, they most likely wouldn't put their new account as (Old Name) II. This is just a repeat of 2005 when I was accused of hacking into computers, when really, it was using passwords that I found in a publically available list. That's just stupidity on the staff's fault.
Decline reason:
All recent edits from this account has been vandalism anyway, so I'm upholding your block. -- Netsnipe ► 14:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Neoballmon II (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Excuse me? Other than the other night, I have not vandalised for a number of months, March by what I can see in my contributions list, and that wasn't even fully vandalistic; it was true facts, just probably not what an encyclopedia would want. I'd say that around 90% of my edits have been in good taste - I've even started a couple of pages, 5% factual but useless here and only about 5% pure vandalism so I feel that I should be given another chance..if I vandalise again, feel free to block me. Neoballmon II 04:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You admit to being another user who has been indefinitely blocked. Whether or not this user was User:Neoballmon is rather academic at this point, given that you have returned, and are continuing to vandalize while circumventing your indefinite block. Suffice to say this isn't the way to go about appealing your indefinite block on your original account. --Haemo 05:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Neoballmon II (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Well doesn't that show courage to admit when I'm another much worse account? And yes, it was Neoballmon the first. I don't know what circumventing means, but I assume it has something to do with circles and possibly expressing my feelings - hence 'venting'. So when I put them together, I get walking around in circles venting myself on the site? That's kind of hard, even though I'm on a laptop, it's still hard to walk around in circles 'vandalising' the page of my good friend Tobias Mayer from Ranchester, Wyoming, who by the way, has no hard feelings about either of my edits, and feels that I should be unblocked. And vandalize? I'm Australian, I won't accept bastardised American spelling with the Z. And I am in no ways appealing my block for Neoballmon (the original). I know he's gone, I've buried him in his grave, and it's not good to be a zombie! Neoballmon II (this account, that I AM appealing), is currently only in a coma, so there is still a chance that he could wake up. Unfortunately though, I have to go now, so I guess that's the extent of my rant for tonight, so goodnight moderators and admin. Love you all heaps!! xxxx (and no, I'm not sucking up...) -- Neoballmon II 13:57, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You provide no sound rationale for being unblocked and regardless of the sockpuppeting, your contributions do not indicate a willingness to contribute positively here. — Pascal.Tesson 15:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.