User talk:NannaFoss
Welcome![edit]
Hi NannaFoss! I noticed your contributions to Lars Gunnarsen and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Atlantic306 (talk) 02:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Maria Appel Nissen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Thank you for taking the time to translate this, but it does not appear to meet our notability guidelines. I don't see any WP:GNG passing sources (multiple paragraphs of description of her in multiple high quality sources such as newspapers and books). And she doesn't appear to pass WP:NACADEMIC. h-index of 8, her most cited paper has 23 cites.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Maria Appel Nissen for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Appel Nissen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
–Novem Linguae (talk) 02:50, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mark Grimshaw-Aagaard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.amazon.com/Mark-Grimshaw/e/B00J7AF5TA%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share and https://www.uib.no/en/rs/grieg/120390/mark-grimshaw-aagaard. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 21:39, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021[edit]
Hi NannaFoss! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Romeo V. Turcan that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Romeo V. Turcan[edit]
Hello, NannaFoss,
Thank you for creating Romeo V. Turcan.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
This article needs more input from sources ABOUT Turcan, not by Turcan. Thank you.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 08:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)