User talk:NBjourno

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Canadian University Press. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. --GreenJoe 00:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please get off your control freak kick? The edits aren't controversial, they're historical. You're the only one who keeps deleting them. If we've got to get the list hosted on CUP's site just to make you happy, I'm sure that can be arranged.NBjourno 00:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Canadian University Press. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. GreenJoe 01:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing how you've done three reverts doesn't that mean you violated the rule? Listen, surely you can get a life? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NBjourno (talk • contribs)

I'll wait and revert it when policy permits. GreenJoe 02:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Canadian University Press[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Pursey ^{Talk | Contribs} 02:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]