User talk:Mr.nothing anonymous

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mr.nothing anonymous, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Hindu philosophy did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:45, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Hindu philosophy, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:46, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Charvaka, you may be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 19:40, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rajneesh. Lard Almighty (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mleccha have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mleccha was changed by Mr.nothing anonymous (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.901762 on 2021-08-10T17:21:29+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:21, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruption and addition of unsourced content, competency issues. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:04, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Irreligious Atheism moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Irreligious Atheism, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ASUKITE 00:58, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, List of notable former hindus who left Hinduism and became Irreligious or atheist[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of notable former hindus who left Hinduism and became Irreligious or atheist. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of converts to nontheism#Former Hindus. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of converts to nontheism#Former Hindus. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ... discospinster _talk 13:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lingam, you may be blocked from editing. WikiLinuz (talk) 17:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamaguchi先生: This user has not refined from disruptive behavior, given that their contributions are either non-constructive, content removal or blatantly getting reverted, which is clearly WP:NOTHERE. I suggest infinite block to avoid further disruption. Thanks, WikiLinuz (talk) 17:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since the other admin wasn't around, I shall ping a currently active administrator. @Daniel Case: Could you mind taking care of this? Thanks, WikiLinuz (talk) 18:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiLinuz: Is this last edit not good? It looks well-intended to me and hasn't been reverted. Daniel Case (talk) 22:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: There are multiple issues with that Antireligion article—which I don't wanna go into here—other than the fact that most of the WP:ICs are primary. That edit that you're referring to was reverted for the reasons mentioned in summary. Please have a look at their contributions list; they're intentionally disruptive for which they're previously blocked for 2 weeks by the admin User:Yamaguchi先生. Most of their contributions on Wikipedia are straight out WP:NOTHERE, I could list 10s of them—since there aren't many useful ones—but I think one could make the assessment fairly straightforward. I suggest an infinite block to avoid further disruption. WikiLinuz (talk) 22:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I written everything with proper sources. Check those sources before reverting it. You just reverted it for your propaganda. Mr.nothing anonymous (talk) 22:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I'm having some trouble understanding how we can consider a notable essay written by (or at least attributed to) a notable person, whose article has a subsection on his atheism and categorizes him so, is somehow not a reliable source to justify that edit. It seems that WikiLinuz thinks a secondary source is needed, WP:ABOUTSELF notwithstanding. Why? Daniel Case (talk) 22:27, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The essay is considered notable because there exist reliable secondary sources which pillar its notability; the subsection of the person also cites secondary sources, which they could've copied. Interpretation of the primary material and drawing conclusions is a violation of WP:NOR. This isn't the first time; they lack WP:COMPETENCE, which other editors warned them about multiple times. WikiLinuz (talk) 22:44, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiLinuz why you are reverting lingam and blasphemy laws edits for your propaganda? I have cited multiple sources from scriptures and authentic websites. Mr.nothing anonymous (talk) 10:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lingam, you may be blocked from editing. Further disruption will take you to WP:ANI. WikiLinuz (talk) 21:55, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rajneesh. Lard Almighty (talk) 17:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have given the source from osho.com what wrong in that? Mr.nothing anonymous (talk) 17:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hindu philosophy, you may be blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:27, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DS-alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

December 2021[edit]

Your edit to Charvaka has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Hut 8.5 19:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Irreligious ex-hindus[edit]

Hello, Mr.nothing anonymous. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Irreligious ex-hindus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Irreligious Atheism[edit]

Hello, Mr.nothing anonymous. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Irreligious Atheism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Irreligious ex-hindus[edit]

Hello, Mr.nothing anonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Irreligious ex-hindus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Irreligious Atheism[edit]

Hello, Mr.nothing anonymous. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Irreligious Atheism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Hindus into Hindu denominations. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 01:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Your edit to Irreligion in India has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Shambuka has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 20:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: This is 3rd or 4th violation in last 6 months. Just warnings won't do, a block is what needs to happen now. Earlier block was of 2 weeks for disruptive editing which also failed to teach this user anything. 117.99.104.99 (talk) 21:02, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. We are now at the point where I would issue a final warning, not a block.— Diannaa (talk) 21:12, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 08:46, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Ibn al-Rawandi has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 20:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Abecedare (talk) 22:00, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note The edit that precicipitated this block was this one in which you copied-and-pasted text from this cite. What made it worse was, (1) that you have been repeatedly warned about copyright violations and plagiarism, including very recently, and (2) the copied text was added to the article lede without any regards for the context, punctuation or flow. The latter problem is also seen in your recent edit to Jawaharlal Nehru, which caused the resultant sentence to read as, Described as "Secular Humanist", and styling himself as a "scientific humanist"...; also the second citation you provided for the edit contains neither the word "secular" nor "humanist". And in your other recent edit, you deleted a paragraph from the lede of Oedipus complex , even though the content was supported in the body of the article as is consistent with MOS:LEADCITE.

Those are some of the problems with just your three most recent edits; you have been amply warned about other issues as seen by the messages on your talkpage. Once your current block expires, you need to take greater care in following wikipedia policies and guidelines, because editing in the current vein is likely to see you blocked for longer persiods, or even indefinitely. Abecedare (talk) 22:21, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]