User talk:Mr. Lefty/Archive 3
This page is an archive. To leave me a new message, go to User talk:Mr. Lefty.
Re: User:Neo222[edit]
Well I won't do at the moment. The guy will soon get bored/grow up/run out of IPs. If it gets worse I will consider it. Thanks, — FireFox 19:51, 04 July '06
Please, I had enough and STOP MAKING SUCH FALSE CHARGES![edit]
Dear Mr. Lefty, I've understand what you're trying to tell me and negotiate recently about me making such personal attacks on other people (particularly editors). As a matter a fact, I myself really did NOT make any real personal attacks on that editor named Bignole or on anyone else! You see, back in that recent discussion while I was having a meeting conversation with Bignole on the matter of whether the Trivia section of "Smallville (TV Series)" that I've created needs to be added in that article or not, all I just ever did was to demand a good reason from them on why that aforementioned Trivia was not put up and nothing else! I'm just giving out a stressing plea and that's all! After of all this said and done for that previous business, later I just couldn't believe it when I see the next caution from you cautioning me about the same thing! May I ask on why do you still put on a blame on me for giving out personal attacks after I've received from Bignole who warn me with this same warning! Why do you have to warn me again? Such troublesome manner! "Sigh!"
Speaking of my recent discussion with Bignole, why do you have to go over to my second reply of that discussion and take it so and too seriously? Why couldn't you get the whole clear picture of what I was trying to intend and convey to him? Why do you have or seem to be so inquisitive and sentitive on about how I was trying to assert throughout the whole of that discussion? Why do you have to be so concern about what I was trying to argue? Who ask you and by what authority do you hold when you affirmly mention that I had made such attacks followed by your cowed or blackmailed statement that goes ("...Such behavior will earn you a block....") from my user talk-page? What good do you get by simply pointing your finger out against me falsely for such a trivial incident? My goodness gracious! Please, stop troubling me!!! Besides, for your information, I AM NOT RUDE! So could you please stop making such a bad remark (about me) stating that I'm being rude? Branding other people or editors as "rude" is also considered as violating one of the courtesy codes of WP:NPA!!! In addition, if you continue to make such warnings' in a stern tone coupled with blackmail statements or remarks is considered as lashing out personal attacks and such behavioural tone will earn you a block as well! Don't you understand? Why can't you just make myself clear and go on with your own life without interfering me like a busybody? Shiiish!!!
Next, the caution that you have given to me about making personal attacks is more than enough already! This is because somebody else or the other editor has given me the same warning like you did just now as well! Don't you see it? So please, please stop issuing that warning out again and leave me alone! I really had enough of all this! I do not want anyone to issue that same old hackneyed warning to me again anymore once and for all! Spare me some time to learn from it would you? Because I have other stuffs to deal with or to do as well from the outside world or real life! Doing this to clarify you the correct reason only just waste my precious big time of my entire lifetime-lah! PLEASE, do stop it and halt making such untrue accusations!!! I could not believe this! "Aiyoyo!" "Sigh!" (Notification: This might be your last admonishment or warning from me) -onWheeZierPLot Wednesday, 5th July, 2006ad.
My RFA[edit]
|
Thank you for your vote in my RFA, which succeeded with a final tally of 66-0-4. If there's anything I can help you with now that I'm an admin, please let me know on my talk page. Again, thanks! Mangojuicetalk 20:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC) |
Ha[edit]
So you've gone from Cat to Squidward, eh? 69.145.123.171 Hello! Wednesday, July 5, 2006, 03:04 (UTC)
- Yeah, just be sure to not write 'SQUIDWARD!' in the edit summary, or Curps's bot will blast you! 69.145.123.171 Hello! Wednesday, July 5, 2006, 19:02 (UTC)
- Huh... That's odd. Usually that thing is fast. And deadly. 69.145.123.171 Hello! Wednesday, July 5, 2006, 19:04 (UTC)
Re: Deletion[edit]
I'm trying to sort it with an all-in-one move/deletion. However, the article doesn't seem to want to move at the moment but I'm working on it :) — FireFox 19:08, 05 July '06
NOTICE[edit]
I YOU WOULD TALK THE TIME TO NOTICE WHAT CHARLESKNIGHT HAS DONE TO ME YOU WOULD PROBALLY THINK BEFORE YOU ACT AbdelkweIi 23:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
That article you Afd then prodded. You know which one I mean?[edit]
Just to let you know I removed the prod here to put the article back to the redirect it's supposed to be. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to BYFI (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 16:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Acetone Edit[edit]
Hi, sorry, but I think my friend Keith at work here got on my computer and did that. (my name is Sean) I would never maliciously edit a page here. Have a great day!
Sean
Revert[edit]
Ta for the Jonny the (boring) Vandal revert! ➨ ЯEDVERS 12:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Tommy Maddox[edit]
Dear Mr. Lefty, as you know, I have edited the Tommy Maddox only to have you to revert it back to its previous form because you classify my edits as "vandalism". Let me assure you that what I put on his page was indeed not vandalism. While Tommy was a Pittsburgh Steeler, he and I were actually good friends. Whenever he wasn't practicing for a big game, or getting ready to warm the bench in his last two years in Pittsburgh, he was over my house or I would be over his. All of the facts that I put on the page today were indeed that; facts, not vandalism. Due to your unfair classification of my work as vandalism and your insults to me by reverting my work, I demand an apology. Ontop of that, I also demand that you lift the final warning where I could be frozen from editing wikipedia again. Thanks you.
Porncruft[edit]
Heh, sorry man, it is a pretty nifty word though =) doktorb wordsdeeds 14:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
mr lefty, I continuously get warnings about vandalism from pps onjomop'ersu9ds\980ydm -9 but i didn't do it 4 nob
Signpost updated for July 10th[edit]
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 28 | 10 July 2006 | |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Signpost delivered by: RoyBoy 800 04:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Re: Nonsense[edit]
I apologize somewhat (my nonsense shouldn't have made it into the page), but the page had nonsense on it before me. That's why I was nominating it for a db Antares33712 20:28, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's cool, it was a little juvenile of me (although I thought the page would eventually be gone). Sorry, again :-) Antares33712 20:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
too bad public computers exist[edit]
But I'll be good from now on.
Hi there, Mr. Lefty. 69.67.229.21 04:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Gracias![edit]
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page! Have a great day. Alphachimp talk 18:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Attacking me[edit]
My User page is under attack. I think advising the culprits to stop vandalising me would be the appropriate action. Thank you Porky Pig 18:58, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please do not post any further to my talk page. As of now my vote will be that you do not get the administrators position. Thank you Porky Pig 19:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Your Userpage[edit]
I know someone who does a great job overhauling userpages... I really like mine. Talk to Sango123. Chancellor Alt 14:12, May 5, 2024 (UTC).
Vandalism report[edit]
Hi. Regarding what you wrote on the admins' noticeboard, you'd look into it when 24.12.158.51 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) starts up again: He has. So if you would please check on this, here are the details:
- He was registered as User:Atticus765, but blocked indefinitely in May 2006, for vandalism, block evasion, etc.
- Has during his blocks used several sockpuppets, which have all been blocked.
- Has continued vandalism, despite multiple warnings from me and other editors, under his IP. I have reported him at least half a dozen times, most of which were ignored, some of which led to short-term blocks. Shortly after each block expired, he continued to vandalise the exact same pages as before.
I am tired of reporting him every week, only to see an admin telling me he has stopped and then having him be back the next day to keep vandalising. I hope you can help with this and finally block this guy permanently. Thanks, HarryCane 11:42, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think a CheckUser inquiry was run, but the IP's edit history clearly shows the same pages vandalised, the same vandalism style and the timing matches the time when Atticus765 got blocked. And even if this isn't the same person, after three temporary blocks that all showed no effect (as he usually started vandalising again the day the ban was lifted) I think a permanent block would still be justified based on just the IP's vandalism alone (over 150 edits; all vandalism) and not counting Atticus765's edits. I just feel that every admin I've reported this to only saw the most recent edits he made, not the whole spectrum and history of edits by this guy I revert every week, and I fear that if I take this to another instance, this won't change. But if you consider the incident noticeboard the "weapon of choice", I'll try my luck there. Thanks for your help, HarryCane 20:30, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Davodd 06:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
|
Hello Mr. Lefty/Archive 3, and thank you for your support at my Request for Adminship, which succeeded with an overwhelming final count of (105/2/0). I was very pleased with the outpouring of kind words from the community that has now entrusted me with these tools, from the classroom, the lesson in human psychology and the international resource known as Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Please feel free to leave me plenty of requests, monitor my actions (through the admin desk on my userpage) and, if you find yourself in the mood, listen to some of what I do in real life. In any case, keep up the great work and have a fabulous day. Grandmasterka 07:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC) |
IP: 152.163.100.136[edit]
This IP continues to vandalize...
Signpost updated for July 17th[edit]
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 29 | 17 July 2006 | |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. --Michael Snow 05:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Congragulations![edit]
Cross-namespace redirects[edit]
You are receiving this message because you previously voiced your opinion on a Redirects for deletion of a cross-namespace redirect that was originally deleted but then went to Deletion review and was then relisted at RFD. This is a courtesy notice so you are aware that the issue is being discussed again and is not an endorsement of any position. --Cyde↔Weys 13:30, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 24th[edit]
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 30 | 24 July 2006 | |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. --Michael Snow 04:33, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk to me![edit]
Just curious, where did you get the idea for that? Wikibout 18:51, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia Research Survey Request[edit]
Hello, I am a member of a research group at Palo Alto Research Center (formerly known as Xerox PARC) studying how conflicts occur and resolve on Wikipedia. Due to your experience in conflict resolution on Wikipedia (e.g., as a member of the Mediation Cabal) we’re extremely interested in your insights on this topic. We have a survey at http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=400792384029 which we are inviting a few selected Wikipedians to participate in, and we would be extremely appreciative if you would take the time to complete it. As a token of our gratitude, we would like to present you with a PARC research star upon completion. Thank you for your time.
Parc wiki researcher 00:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
PARC User Interface Research Group
Edit to policy debate[edit]
If this edit was made in good faith, you are sorely mistaken. "Spread" and its derivatives are in common use, as evidenced by some of the articles linked for the policy debate article and its derivatives. I have debated for more than 5 years now and never heard the term "spewing". At first glance it appears almost certainly to be a term used by those who are critical of speed, if at all, making it a definitively non-neutral term. savidan(talk) (e@) 23:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- As I said on your talk page, where I come from "spreading" refers to the practice of making mass arguments so that the other side runs out of time to refute them, and "spewing" is a completely acceptable term. I suppose there can be regional differences, so I'll just add that "spewing" is an alternative term. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 23:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- You are correct that the oral history of policy debate seems to indicate that originally spreading referred to making multiple arguments that cannot be grouped (perhaps through non-speed reading techniques); however, this is inconsequential as the term has evolved to mean simply speaking faster to make more arguments. There is also the possible origin of: speed + read = spread.
- I don't know if it is used in your region or not: it's impossible to verify that claim. The Cheshire article linked in that section currently uses the term "spread". If you want to list "spew" as an alternate term, I think that asking you to provide a source is reasonable. Otherwise, please remove it from the article yourself. The article has already been demoted from good article status because it contains too much original research. I haven't had time to go through and clean it yet, but let's at least not add anything else that can't be verified. savidan(talk) (e@) 23:52, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, User:Christopher Thomas brought this to my attention. Please note that after talk page discussions involving DrL and some others, I decided to selfnom for MfD the subpages listed at User:Hillman/Dig. I'd like to let that run its course before getting back to this matter. Please note that the context in which I have been maintaining these pages is explained (I hope!) at User:Hillman/Digging. Ironically, when DrL says "there are some people on WP that abuse the system, but Hillman alone should not be the one to decide who needs special attention" she didn't add that the very reasons the pages exist is that I am struggling to formulate and propose policies on both wikishilling and digging. This activity and of course the MfD both represent seeking guidance from the Wikipedia community. I have also tried to tell her that I will abide by the MfD and even if, as I hope, I am allowed to continue my research unmolested, I am willing to discuss with her some compromise between respect for her privacy and the needs of policy discussion. If she will simply take a break and calm down I believe this should be achievable, in fact I already have some ideas (but am not toying with them while the MfD is ongoing). When she said that I am adding "additional conjecture", you can see from my contribs that I added some additional links to edit histories, which is public information. I also slightly softened the language on the page she is complaining about, but am avoiding major changes while the MfD is in progress since it seems to me that all participants in the MfD should see substantially the same versions.---CH 01:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Re: My userpage[edit]
Hi Mr. Lefty, I'd be happy to help out. Organization shouldn't be a problem, as everything on your userpage fits together nicely, so are there any details (like color scheme) that you have in mind for a design? Regards, Sango123 03:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Nonsense1 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 20:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Strike out invalid warning. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:30, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Re: Adminship[edit]
Thank you so much for nominating me! I feel greatly honoured. I have accepted your nomination, and it's now posted on WP:RFA. G.He 23:45, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Userpage Overhaul[edit]
Hello Mr. Lefty. I noticed the overhaul request notice on the top of your userpage, and I would like to make a suggestion to help you out. Use of the div tag will split your userpage into multiple sections use div style="float:left" to make a div that'll move to the left side of the page, and replace left for right for a section that'll float to the right. My userpage makes use of this technique, and I would invite you to not only look at its code, but also to edit and experiment with it. Don't worry, I can revert it back later! This technique should help remove a lot of that whitespace and make your page much neater. --Targetter 01:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks[edit]
Thanks for reverting the vandalism off my page. ThuranX 03:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 31st[edit]
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 31 | 31 July 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Isn't it my right to do whatever I want with my user page???[edit]
I can blank it if I want, no? Such as you can edit yours any way you feel, I have that right too. 65.34.136.176 18:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Er, no. If you're going to remove a section (especially warnings) without archiving it or discussing it with an admin or on your talk page (Which you haven't) is going to net you ANOTHER warning. And probably complete lack of respect in the community. You can edit, but you need to edit with an intent to actually acomplish something, not just hide mistakes. (For example, you can remove a blocked user's messages (Because they're blocked) from your talk page. Warnings from nonblocked users however stick with you quite a long time!) Logical2u 18:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Fixing Vandalized Page[edit]
Thanks for your help!!! --Bearly541 21:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Bobby Love is blocked indefinitely. Geo. 21:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Redesign completed[edit]
I hope you like it! Feel free to complain if you want anything changed. ;) Cheers, Sango123 23:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
sorry[edit]
This is first first posting -- not sure why it was tagged for deletion-- please explain thanks Lusigep
notability[edit]
Wikipedia:Notability (music) Important note: Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion. An article that fails to even claim that the subject of the article is notable can be speedy deleted under criterion A7, however. A mere claim of notability, even if contested, may avoid deletion under A7 and require a full Article for Deletion process to determine if the subject of the article is notable.
Many of us who spend a lot of time improving Wikipedia's musical coverage feel that notability is required for a musical topic (such as a band or musical theatre group) to deserve an article here. Please note that the failure to meet any of these criteria does not mean an article must be deleted; likewise, the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. These are merely rules of thumb which some editors choose to keep in mind when deciding whether or not to keep an article that is on articles for deletion.
Also, please keep in mind that the article in question must actually document that the criterion is true. It is not enough to make vague claims in the article or assert a band's importance on a talk page or AfD page -- the article itself must document notability.
Alert![edit]
Mark ritzchkin has been blocked indefinitely, but can still edit. Please block him. He has been vandalising. He has already been warned twice. El gRiNgO 21:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Crisspy
Thanks....[edit]
...for reverting my userpage. Happy Editing! Teke 04:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Tower Bridge[edit]
thanks for adding info...i didn't know much about the bridge, but I had a great image i could release
Thanks[edit]
Thanks for the revert on my page :-) Myanw 20:03, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
you earned the thumbs up award[edit]
for the lightning like speed with which you got to my new Huberto Maestas article. I did it just to avoid red ink at the Padre Martinez article where I added an image. i stay and chat, but I have to go to a funeral. Carptrash 16:45, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
=)[edit]
Vandals make me laugh sometimes. :) Why are you Mr. Lefty and not Mr. Righty? I take it your left handed???--Andeh 17:09, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- He's been reblocked for two weeks now! :P--Andeh 17:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
AFD: Darryn Lyons[edit]
On AFD, you voiced an opinion that the article Darryn Lyons should be deleted. I have gone ahead and expanded it a bit, and I wondered whether you would be willing to re-evaluate the situation. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 22:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Award[edit]
The Petty Admin award Is given to an admin who continually picks small fights over trivial edits made, fights and continually reverts edits which concern edits thay have made.
Awarded for you edits and reverts on The clockwise page.--Lucy-marie 22:50, 4 August 2006 (UTC)(This is meant as a bit of fun so please do not take offence to me making you the inagural recipent of the award)
Please read the code left on your talk page.--Lucy-marie 07:31, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Could you please display my award that was given to you on your award page and then I will be more than happy to put the whole Incident behind me. The award was given in good humour so please do not take offence to It.--Lucy-marie 13:53, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Referendum[edit]
Please change your vote. No referendum was held and those references are not related. Please see and research better. --Noisettes 15:59, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Request unblock[edit]
Hello, 210.0.201.213 is the gateway of Hutchison Global Communications, one of the well-known ISPs in Hong Kong. May I request only block unregistered users? --Hello World! 02:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
NOT ME[edit]
HI, I DON'T HAVE A CLUE AS TO WHAT EDITS YOU ARE REFERRING TO...I HAVE MADE NO EDITS TO ANY ARTICLES....PERHAPS I'M BEING HACKED...BRIAN
Just relisted it as an IP deleted it from AfD.--Andeh 10:02, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to the Pokémon Collaborative Project, we hope you have a fab time editing Pokémon articles. If you have any questions about the articles, style, content or simply what our favourite Pokémon is (it varies, trust us) leave a message on the project talk page. Cheers and happy editing, The Raven's Apprentice (Talk|Contribs) 15:03, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- You? The Raven's Apprentice (Talk|Contribs) 15:03, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Er, no. i just wasn't expecting that the guy whose userpage warning I nicked to join my pet WikiProject. ;) Cheers, The Raven's Apprentice (Talk|Contribs) 06:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 7th[edit]
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 32 | 7 August 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks[edit]
Thanks for reverting the nasty message on my user page. I don't know why that person thinks I'm doing that stuff.
Faris b 00:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC)