User talk:Mondo Liebknecht

July 2013[edit]

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Kate Garvey, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:08, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do you think I'm going to be blocked because of a kid is bored and has no personal life? Do you a favor and stop editing, any article you touch will be protected and you know it. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:13, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good for you, now start to act as a 78 years old person. The page was nominated two times in the last month for deletion, and this comment, which is an attack to her, compared to this explains that you are both connected, and considering the fact "new users" don't AFD articles, and that you don't need to create an account to do so, you perfectly know that you are banned from editing. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:26, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Technoquat, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:23, 29 July 2013 (UTC) [reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Technoquat (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rs chen 7754 00:27, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mondo Liebknecht (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Technoquat. Once you do the Checkuser you will see that. Not that I'm worried about how embarrassed you will be once you check the IPs.. So unblock me.

Decline reason:

(1) Checkuser is completely incapable of proving that two accounts are not used by the same person. (2) Your silly patronising remark about how embarrassed other users will be is at best irrelevant, and at worst trolling. (3) Looks to me like Technoquat. (4) Whether you are Technoquat or not, your editing is not helpful to the project. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.