User talk:Midousan

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Midousan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 22:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your praise...[edit]

I'm wondering. How does ass-kissing make you feel? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.0.119.139 (talk) 03:37, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Im wondering how does being a troll make you feel, my comment left on enviroboys page was left out of sheer wootness. Did i make that comment hoping to get somewhere. no I couldnt care where the fuck i end up in wikipedia. I will act as i am. If that gets me banned so be it. if that gets me a head so be it. I know wiki is full of dramas. and all i can do is be myself so thats what i do.

Your comment on User talk:Tedder[edit]

Actually, his edit re-added the content, not removed it. Also, you need to tone down your language. A lot. Comments like

Seriously, what is someone from Seattle who is an Athiest doing on a Canadian catholic highschool page? Troll!(angreh that catholics beat a recard arent you, you poor wittle athiest?)

are absolutely unacceptable under any circumstances. Please read WP:NPA. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 06:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And I still think his motivation for what he did was based on his hatred of catholics/christians(And Im not even religious, im agnostic) But hey, I guess I can't bring that concern foreword because im just smallfry in this world of wiki and mods will always side with the person whose been here for the longest. Meh. (Midousan (talk) 23:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naru2u[edit]

The article Naru2u has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No coverage by reliable and independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Esw01407 (talk) 20:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just became aware of this because I haven't used this account in ages. Will update, undelete and resource.

Naru2u[edit]

Hi,

Under proposed deletion procedures, the protest of any editor -- including yourself -- is sufficient to cause the article to be restored. Given your desire to edit the article to provide further references, I will userfy the article to your userspace at User:Midousan/Naru2u, and you may move it back to mainspace when you feel it is ready. Please understand that the restoration I will now perform does not prevent any editor from nominating the article for a full deletion debate once the article returns to the mainspace. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 15:42, 21 June 2014 (UTC) Thank you (Midousan (talk) 23:43, 13 July 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Nomination of Naru2u for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naru2u is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naru2u until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Esw01407 (talk) 02:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and delete the article, and the userfied web space. The owners of the convention expressed interest in those who created and maintained the wiki page to let it die. Midousan (talk) 20:45, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]