User talk:Mespar20

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Upwork for some of their contributions to E Javier Loya.

E. Javier Loya moved to draftspace[edit]

Hi. Your article on E. Javier Loya is better than before but still shows clear signs of being a paid creation. Being too promotional still, it has been moved to Draft:E. Javier Loya. Since you're relatively new, please submit paid articles for review with WP:AFC.

Additionally we try to be careful not to use court documents as sources. I get that you were trying to show all sides of the subjects including the negative ones, but the section there could do with some neutral summarizing.

I would recommend taking a break from this particular subject for a few months, and instead contributing to some already existing articles, that's really the only way one can learn about how articles are written here.

– Thjarkur (talk) 10:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

E Javier Loya moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, E Javier Loya, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

E. Javier Loya moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, E. Javier Loya, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Please refer to WP:DISCLOSE and WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE before you move this into mainspace again.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 21:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: E. Javier Loya (October 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:E. Javier Loya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:E. Javier Loya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 04:17, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mespar20! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 04:17, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]