User talk:MarathiPaulPadtePudhe

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

January 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for copyright violations. I see that before Jbhunley's warning, archived by you after 20 minutes (!), you had already received several clear warnings and explanations about copyright on Wikipedia, which you had also promptly archived. Nevertheless you added copyrighted text to Mangalashtak Once More. Since Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and since warnings and advice have had no effect (other than you promptly removing the warnings out of sight, thereby showing you've read them), I have blocked you indefinitely. Btw, I congratulate you on being aware of how to archive your talkpage just four days after you started editing. That's a rare skill in a new user. And you knew about redirects, too.[1] Have you had an account previously?. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 15:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MarathiPaulPadtePudhe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry I won't repeat it. Please give me a second chance

Decline reason:

You've already had your second chance, and you blew it by ignoring the warnings and continuing with further copyright violations. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:21, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, and not to mention that the editor is a disruptive sock operator who keeps generating garbage articles... Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]