User talk:MajinPerfect

Welcome!

Hello, MajinPerfect, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Food Reviewer, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Axel™ (talk) 05:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Food Reviewer[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Food Reviewer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Axel™ (talk) 05:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at The Food Reviewer[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from The Food Reviewer. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps:

Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says Click here to contest this speedy deletion.
This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willingly to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 06:06, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Frieza. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Sudo Ghost 06:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Idiot is a word to describe a foolish and senseless person, he's both. Therefore he fits the word, regardless if what you consider an "attack". Thanks.

It is both a comment on the editor and not the content, and is a personal attack. Whether it is true or not is irrelevant, it is disruptive to a collaborative editing environment. Please discuss content, not contributors. Otherwise, you will very likely find yourself blocked from editing. Thank you. - Sudo Ghost 06:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's an adjective to describe not only him but his actions and attitude, therefore it fits the criteria. A personal "attack", it's the end of the world huh? Someone called someone an idiot! Grow up and get lost.

Then please consider this your final warning. Continued personal attacks will result in you being blocked from editing. WP:CIVILITY is a core policy at Wikipedia, and calling someone an "idiot" is disruptive and serves no purpose, and the only thing it will accomplish is leading to a block. Please keep this in mind. Thank you. - Sudo Ghost 06:50, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep in mind that he is an idiot and maybe once someone calls him on his bullshit, he'll shut the fuck up. This is your final warning, get the fuck off my page.

Okay man, obviously you're not interested in being civil and working cooperatively with other users. Unfortunately for you, this is an encyclopedia and we ask that if you're going to participate, that you do so without doing things like telling other users to "get the fuck off your page". I'm going to drop a short block on you and hope you cool down. Once it's finished, we invite you to come back - as long as you can be civil to other users. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't give two shits faggot, fuck off.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And that last comment has earned you an indefinite block. It is apparent that you can not be a civil contributor. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, get the fuck off my page faggot.

And now your talk page access has been revoked. If you want your account unblocked, you can follow the directions at Wikipedia:Appealing a block#Appeal to the Arbitration Committee. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]