User talk:Magdalenathe88

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Magdalenathe88, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 00:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful editing an article when you have a professional relationship with the subject[edit]

Hello, Magdalenathe88. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Corzo, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Corzo with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To expand on Mark Arsten's remark, removing references, links, and other formatting from articles is disruptive. —C.Fred (talk) 00:54, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Corzo with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is perfectly possible for an involved party to edit neutrally. That's not what you're doing. First of all, "at the company's request" is anathema here: we don't do requests. Second, I hope that your next set of edits has more neutral language in it (and doesn't remove formatting etc.); so far I have not seen any evidence that you are aware of Wikipedia's guidelines, and if that continues, this account will be blocked, and that is probably not something your client wants. You've run into a couple of admins and editors who have reverted and even warned you; there are other admins who would have blocked you already. Please don't prove me and Mark Arsten wrong. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 23:56, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]