User talk:Madman7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

for more see For other uses, see disambiguation pages for New World Order and NWO. and Talk:New World Order (conspiracy theory)‎;

ew World oDter Theory: a portion of society that is an underground orgainzation resp0onjsable for all anti=-government actions...

Block quote

#REDIRECT [[


formation{| class="wikitable" border="1" |- ! Formation year ! sects ! codes of condust |- | C-2205 BC, and re instated(Secoldary sect) 1520BC | 1320BC (Euro Regional-1,-2 915BC, 1050BC (asia sect),133BC part 2 | 150 BC-31150AD (EURO-AMerica), 1128ad-1766AD(expantion) |- | row 2, cell 1 | row 2, cell 2 | row 2, cell 3 | Real Media Published From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search NWO General Code (updeted) (2007)

published ad an updated for the new blood in the revolution

For other uses, see disambiguation pages for New World Order and NWO.

[edit] SEction listing [1] Intro manifesto (Orritional) Exerpt from last issue (1996/2006)


Madman7 3/11/09


Welcome[edit]

Hello Madman7, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Madman7, good luck, and have fun. --Dougweller (talk) 15:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:New World Order (conspiracy theory) are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Please read WP:OR and WP:Verifiable -- and talk pages are not forums where you can promote your own ideas, so please don't do that again. If you read the two links, plus some of the ones above, WP:RS about the sorts of sources we like, and WP:NPOV they will help you become a better editor. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 15:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]