User talk:Maciste

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello Maciste, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- KHM03 18:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution! A question, if I may: Given that admins and editors are (correctly) getting more careful with citing information, is there a source for the note that some fans are "annoyed" at the prominence given the Hermione character in the Potter films (as compared with the novels)? TIA :) RadioKirk talk to me 18:17, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Karla (film), but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Yamla 22:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Karla Homolka, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Yamla 22:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Alicia Witt, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Yamla 03:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rex Reason[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Rex Reason article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (in this case:from here) or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! -GTBacchus(talk) 00:15, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Elizabeth Swann.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 03:28, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use[edit]

I reverted your addition of the image to the Alicia Witt article because you forgot to add a detailed fair-use justification, as you are required to do. Please note that the Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Yamla 18:41, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your image, Image:HepburnTracy.jpg, from the page on Spencer Tracy because you forgot to add a detailed fair-use justification as you are required to do. --Yamla 18:43, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:SpencerTracy.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:44, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SpencerTracy.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SpencerTracy.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:44, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked for continuing to upload copyrighted images without specifying source or copyright information (and in any case, the images weren't used fairly). An example of this is your upload of Image:000.jpg. This block is for 48 hours. Please do not do this again. Wikipedia takes copyright violation very seriously and your next block will be for substantially longer. --Yamla 03:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Orphaned fair use image (Image:995DPO Salma Hayek 038.jpg)[edit]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:995DPO Salma Hayek 038.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. cholmes75 21:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:993MLC_Nicole_Kidman_021.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:996CSH_Deborah_Kara_Unger_016.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Image:993MLC_Nicole_Kidman_021.jpg article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! --Yamla 03:47, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Image:996CSH Deborah Kara Unger 016.jpg article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! --Yamla 03:49, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Hi there. I randomly clicked through a few of your image uploads and noticed that none of them have any sources. Sources are required for all images. Please drop me a message on my talk page within the next day or so letting me know that you'll start adding the sources. I don't expect you to add them all in a day of course, but I need to know that you are going to take care of it. Otherwise, I'll be tagging them all for deletion. Thanks. -PS2pcGAMER (talk) 07:51, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent comments on Arnold Schwarzenegger[edit]

Hey there. Noticed you recently made a change to this article and I beleive you have added a POV which is not necessarily shared by others. I have raised a discussion on it and you might like to go in there and indicate where you are sourcing this information from and whether it is just your own personal view that his acting career was in decline or if this is indeed factual. Enigmatical 02:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Orphaned fair use image (Image:HepburnTracy.jpg)[edit]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:HepburnTracy.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sue Anne 21:22, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have some strange ability to pull people's heights out of thin air. Please reference your sources next time. --mboverload@ 02:52, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Laura prepon2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 04:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright violations[edit]

You have been warned over and over again that images need a source, a correct license, and a detailed fair-use rationale. You continue to blatantly violate copyright by uploading images with none of this (and, in the case of Image:Laura prepon2.jpg, a deliberately false license). I warned you that the next time I caught you doing this, you would be blocked for substantially longer. I have blocked you for a full month. You are deliberately putting Wikipedia at risk because of these violations. If you have learnt your lesson and promise to ensure that all future images will have the necessary and correct information and that you will correct all the images you have uploaded so far (the ones that haven't been deleted already, at least), you can request an unblock by adding {{unblock|Reason for unblock}} to this page. Either myself or any other admin will then unblock you fairly quickly. --Yamla 04:04, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:126.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:126.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:2040_Linna.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:2040_Linna.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:2040_Nene.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:2040_Nene.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:58, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:AlanSteelMoonMenPoster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Xena exposed.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Xena exposed.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. cholmes75 (chit chat) 02:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pedant's comment[edit]

Protagonist. yandman 15:14, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mike Young 2002 He Man.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mike Young 2002 He Man.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Al Saves Leona.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Al Saves Leona.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leona2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Leona2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leona3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Leona3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Puma Gals.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Puma Gals.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Superman/Shazam: First Thunder[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Superman/Shazam: First Thunder, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superman/Shazam: First Thunder. Thank you. FuriousFreddy (talk) 01:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Phil Rose[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Phil Rose, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TubularWorld (talk) 23:45, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:General Hawk.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:General Hawk.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Puma Twins.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Puma Twins.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Randy Pearson[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Randy Pearson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable minor character.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 15:31, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Maciste! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 936 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Chelsea Field - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:V5 scan2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:V5 scan2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mike Young Sorceress 2002.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mike Young Sorceress 2002.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Springer (Transformers) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Springer (Transformers) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Springer (Transformers) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 19:48, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]