User talk:Mabalu/Archives/2013/January
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Speedy deletion declined: Nursery Rhymes 2
Hello Mabalu. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nursery Rhymes 2, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A9 only applies to music recordings, not films. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
OMG, I labored over that article for hours, and can't believe I spelled her name wrong in the lede! Glad it was caught and corrected by a friend! Thanks!--Nixie9 (talk) 16:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles for deletion
Does it work to request speedy deletion on articles for deletion pages?--Starship9000 (talk) 00:24, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- If there is a strong/obvious case for speedy (ie, the article would have been speedied anyway) then yes. Otherwise I think it has to be discussed. Mabalu (talk) 07:34, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Re: A kitten for you!
No problem, thanks for the kitten. Not sure how I keep track of them all, seems to be more then usual lately. Regards ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 00:18, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Message left on my talk page
I understand what you mean.
Is it possible to keep most of my updates, but revert those parts which I shouldn't have changed? Thanks. 94.171.75.101 (talk) 14:22, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Best evah!
Best AFD vote description[1], evah! Irrespective of the actual vote, that made me laugh :) -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) (coi) 17:28, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for adding another source! I hadn't heard of her wearing the dress before! — Statυs (talk, contribs) 01:10, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Thank you for your assistance in protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism across many articles! — MST☆R (Chat Me!) 12:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks! What a situation... did you see that they tried to claim we were all the same person (??!!) Straws, clutching... Mabalu (talk) 12:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- Just another day on the encyclopedia. What annoyed me the most, was the fact that they were going through our contributions, and undoing them - regardless if we reverted a vandalism attempt - they would undo our edit, adding the vandalism back. I am definately going to sleep well tonight, that's for sure!
— MST☆R (Chat Me!) 12:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- Just another day on the encyclopedia. What annoyed me the most, was the fact that they were going through our contributions, and undoing them - regardless if we reverted a vandalism attempt - they would undo our edit, adding the vandalism back. I am definately going to sleep well tonight, that's for sure!
DYK
You removed my nomination from Template talk:Did you know without specifying any reason in your edit summary. I assumed in good faith that it's a genuine mistake and have reverted your edit. LDS contact me 14:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- I'm so sorry - I must have accidentally touch-screened the "rollback" link when checking my watchlist on my phone and I didn't even realise I'd done so. Please accept my apologies. Mabalu (talk) 14:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- It's alright. I've also accidentally pressed "rollback" a few times before. Anyway, I apologise if I seemed aggressive just now. I created that nomination page on 21 January but forgot to add it to the DYK talk page until a bot reminded me today, so I was a bit upset when I saw that my nomination was removed for no reason. LDS contact me 14:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)