User talk:MARSELIMADHE

May 2010[edit]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Skanderbeg III. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. Favonian (talk) 15:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skanderbeg III[edit]

A Google Book search seems to indicate that Zog was indeed known also as Skanderbeg III. See for instance this. Favonian (talk) 15:56, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page KF Tirana. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tommy2010 15:56, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ftese formale[edit]

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits or that you are in some way connected to Albania or Albanians related articles.

We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Albania and Albanians related topics and are organized within WikiProject Albania.
I thought that you may be interested in viewing the current tasks of our WikiProject or its talk page and get involved. Furthermore, if you are interested in joining the wikiproject, please feel free to add your name in the Participants' page!.

Thank you and, again, welcome among us!

--Sulmues ^(talk) 15:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello MARSELIMADHE, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles

The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

MARSELIMADHE, good luck, and have fun. --Sulmues ^(talk) 15:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Albania[edit]

Thanks for your contributions in Albania. And thanks for being back. Cheers. --Sulmues ^(talk) 18:36, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skanderbeg[edit]

You provided a reference for Hodgkinson in Skanderbeg: please provide the page and then I'll enter it as harvn function.--Sulmues ^(talk) 17:46, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have Frasheri's book to reference the page where he says that Skanderbeg is from Sinje? --Sulmues ^(talk) 17:23, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

Could you provide a source (Tirana derby I) for those numbers? --Vinie007 15:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalism or report--Vinie007 17:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are no internet sources for such information. I have my own data from my research. --User:MARSELIMADHE

Proposed deletion of All-time Albanian Superliga table[edit]

The article All-time Albanian Superliga table has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable per precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-time English Football League 1st Division Table.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jenks24 (talk) 18:58, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Skanderbeg[edit]

Hello,

I noticed you removed referenced assertion (diff) in Skanderbeg article. This assertion is supported with works of Oliver Jens Scmitt and John Van Antwerp who are considered as experts in the matter. Please do not remove well referenced text. If you have any objection to it use article talkpage to discuss it.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:43, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Thanks for noticing that problem with chonology. I moved it to appropriate paragraph to follow the chronology. Do you have some sources for list of castles under Skanderbeg's control in 1444?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 17:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change text which is supported with work of Kenneth Setton who is considered expert in the topic as you did in Skanderbeg article (diff). If you have any objection to it use article talkpage to discuss it. Do you have some sources for list of castles under Skanderbeg's control in 1444? --Antidiskriminator (talk) 07:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Albania, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Albanian, Siege of Krujë and Ottoman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mind Your Manners (Pearl Jam song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

"row"|US [[Billboard_charts#Rock|Rock Airplay]] <ref>http://www.billboard.com/charts/rock-airplay}}</ref>
|}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Communist Albania derby[edit]

The article Communist Albania derby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that this is actually a term used to describe matches between the two teams. They have played regularly but no attempt to indicate gng as per WP:NRIVALRY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 23:46, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling music artists in the United States[edit]

Thank you for your contribution to this list, but unfortunately it doesn't conform with the list's source. While your edits may reflect more up-to-date figures, as the article says, "This is the list of the top 100 best-selling music artists in the United States only...based on certifications of albums by the RIAA." Figures in the article must conform to that source ([1]).

If you want to discuss this or the list, please feel free to leave a note at my talk page or at the article's talk page. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:37, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The link to the RIAA's figures still lists "PEARL JAM 31.5". Perhaps they are rounding figures published for individual albums and the cumulative total more accurately reflects the numbers? I don't know, but verifiability requires that we conform to the source. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Balša II[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Balša II. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Zoupan 14:07, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Lionel Messi, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:51, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Albanian Superliga 20 All-time Top Scorers[edit]

The article Albanian Superliga 20 All-time Top Scorers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koppapa (talk) 06:33, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Skanderbeg, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.--Zoupan 11:38, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Skanderbeg. --Zoupan 11:50, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Skanderbeg. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesBWatson: he reverted once again.--Zoupan 13:52, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And now continues at another article.--Zoupan 13:57, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit-warring at Skanderbeg and Skanderbeg's rebellion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the reasons for block and I agree with the policy per se. I will not re-editwar. I was persisting with the edits, because as already told you in your talk page, it is really frustrating the freedom of making such non-historical and moreover obvious irrelevant claims such as Zoupan or other Serbian abusers have done to the Albanian Hero's page. This is why Wikipedia is far from a scientific (historically) ~pedia, as long as some minimal review of content is missing. I am not saying that Wikipedia should control details like Skanderbeg's or Napoleon castles, but should at least preserve the identity of widely accepted realities, like Gjergj Kastriot Skanderbeg being an Albanian prince, leading the Albanian people in an 25 year long epic battle against the Ottomans defending also the European civilization (not some Albanians against other Albanians, etc.). Instead we find irrelevant details , like how it was spelled his name in Slavic language in some document, when in many other documents it is spelled in Latin, Greek, Albanian and in Italian Arberesh songs and folklore is perserved in the original Albanian form, things that are missing from Wikipedia...MARSELIMADHE (talk) 15:03, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Take it easy, don't make yourself part of edit wars again, back your edits with reliable sources and have a look on Wikipedia guidelines. I needed almost four years to understand what Wikipedia means, probably with some help you will need less. Haha it was just a joke, you will surely need less time than me. Just read my advises carefully. You can easily contact me by leaving a message at my own talk page or better leave a message at my Albanian talk page. That thing is my place! Tung. Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Somebody who don't AGF in your case, not me, could see your comment: "Zoupan or other Serbian abusers" as violation of WP:NPA which says "Comment on content, not on the contributor." The ethnicity of other wikipedia editors should not be subject of your comments. Please take a better care in future. Apart from this, I noticed you discussed contemporary documents with Skanderbeg's name in the original Albanian form, preserved in the Italian Arberesh songs. Will you please be so kind to present some contemporary 15th-century documents with this original Albanian language form of Skanderbeg's name which should be added to the article?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:38, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Skanderbeg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Albanian and Venetian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Skanderbeg

added links pointing to Albanian and Venetian

Prezë Castle

added a link pointing to Albanian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Skanderbeg. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, MARSELIMADHE. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, MARSELIMADHE. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]