User talk:Luph25

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Luph25! I am I dream of horses and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

I dream of horses (talk) 03:46, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to F1 2010 (video game). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:17, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:VariantMalaysianflag.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:VariantMalaysianflag.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 09:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flags...[edit]

Please read WP:FLAGCRUFT and do not place flags unnecessarily. There is no reason to have them in the Sumatran earthquake article. Also, please do not revert good faith edits without an explanation. This is very poor form. --Merbabu (talk) 10:48, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:MLTR 2004 Take Me To Your Heart.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:MLTR 2004 Take Me To Your Heart.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ZooFari 05:04, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:West Nusa Tenggara flag.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:West Nusa Tenggara flag.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 23:49, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dynasty Warriors 5. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fin©™ 20:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to TPI (Indonesia), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Smokizzy (talk) 06:54, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Employment (album), you will be blocked from editing. 猛禽22 •• 20:02, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Formula 3 Volkswagen engine.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Formula 3 Volkswagen engine.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 07:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source problem with File:Dual Shock 3 Analog Controller.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dual Shock 3 Analog Controller.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:57, 30 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:57, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of USB controllers compatible with PlayStation 3[edit]

The article List of USB controllers compatible with PlayStation 3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Much of this information is in the PlayStation 3 Article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PDCook (talk) 16:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source problem with File:PSP with XMB screen.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:PSP with XMB screen.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:28, 3 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:28, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:PSP with XMB screen.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:PSP with XMB screen.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive Edits[edit]

The edits you made to Black or White and Who Is It were not useful and obviously NOT researched. Please refrain from such edits or your likely to deal with being blocked from editing soon.Carmaker1 (talk) 10:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Img 52921 logitech cordless wb.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Img 52921 logitech cordless wb.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:29, 30 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:29, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source and copyright licensing problem with File:IndyCar Series cover.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:IndyCar Series cover.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 03:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Sing. GP[edit]

Is a YouTube link your considering compliant with - WP:YOUTUBE ? --Falcadore (talk) 04:50, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Formula One circuits‎[edit]

Please test your edits before saving. If they do not work, do not save them. --Falcadore (talk) 03:37, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replacing Boxart[edit]

Please do not replace existing boxart as you did here. It's preferable to use non-platform specific boxart (or PC boxart) for multiplatform games. Thanks! Fin©™ 17:20, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to re-iterate the above comment. Stop it or I'll report you. – PeeJay 16:00, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to request you stop changing the image. Your replacement is unsuitable due to being platform-specific, having no fair-use rationale, and being far too large to qualify under fair-use anyway. The image already present in the article is far preferable due to meeting these requirements. Thanks, Miremare 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you had your chance. You are obviously a decent contributor to this encyclopaedia, but if you can't respect the policies of the website, you deserved to be reported (see here). – PeeJay 08:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Valencia (Ricardo Tormo) long track.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Valencia (Ricardo Tormo) long track.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 23:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 23:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring against consensus. You have been repeatedly adding the PS3-specific cover to gaming articles, despite being asked not to, by several different editors.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. – Toon 16:21, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Logitech Driving Force GT.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Logitech Driving Force GT.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Logitech GT pedal.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Logitech GT pedal.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Img 52921 logitech cordless wb.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Img 52921 logitech cordless wb.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.logitech.com/repository/2257/png/17163.1.0.png. As a copyright violation, File:Img 52921 logitech cordless wb.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Img 52921 logitech cordless wb.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AlphathonTM (talk) 11:21, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

cordless precision controller image[edit]

File:Logitech cf ps3 02.jpg
This image

Hi. I noticed you uploaded a new image for the logitech cordless precision controller. Unfortunatelly that is still not acceptable. It may not belong to Logitech, like the previous one you uploaded, but it is still copyrighted (to the website you got it from). It is obviously from a website - it even has that sites watermark on it. It cannot be licenced under the creative commons BY YOU. If you contact the site and can get them to release the image as free (CC, GPL etc) and can proove it, then it is perfectly acceptable (as long as the watermark is removed). Otherwise it can't be used I'm afraid. If you look at most of the images I have uploaded you will notice that I have created them myself (DualShock, DualShock 2 etc.) and the remainder are derived from other images that were created by wikipedians (and released as free). If you want an image for the cordless precision controller (why wouldn't you) then you have to take it yourself (i.e. get a camera, and a controller and make a photograph). I'd do it myself if I owned one (although I could take a picture of the PS2 version, but that has different coloured analog sticks and centre logo). AlphathonTM (talk) 13:54, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT - I have submitted it for deletion. Please see links below for more info on file copyright.

Copyright problems with File:Logitech cf ps3 02.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Logitech cf ps3 02.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://techgage.com/viewimg/?img=/reviews/logitech/cordless_freedom_ps3/logitech_cf_ps3_02.jpg&desc=Logitech%20Cordless%20Freedom%20Playstation%203%20Controller. As a copyright violation, File:Logitech cf ps3 02.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Logitech cf ps3 02.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AlphathonTM (talk) 14:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Ps3lpfront.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Ps3lpfront.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://files.playstatic.com/ps3/guitar-hero-iii/ps3lpfront.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Ps3lpfront.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Ps3lpfront.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AlphathonTM (talk) 14:14, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This one I can provide a free image of (I have a GH: World Tour guitar, so I will make an image of that).AlphathonTM (talk) 14:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fifa 06 road to world cup 360 boxart.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fifa 06 road to world cup 360 boxart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 23:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FIFA 10 PlayStation3 coverart.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FIFA 10 PlayStation3 coverart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 03:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your actions have been reported[edit]

Concerning your obsession with console-specific game covers and your inability to correctly tag images' copyright status, I have reported your actions here. Feel free to contribute to the discussion. – PeeJay 00:28, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to upload media files lacking copyright information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you are unsure of the correct copyright template, please refer to the list of image copyright tags or ask at the copyright question page. -FASTILYsock(TALK) 01:49, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS3 Slim infobox[edit]

Hi, just thought I'd let you know that I have reverted your edit to the PS3 slim infobox. The reason being that the information is already there in the pages main infobox. The one for the slim is there to highlight differences (release date etc) rather than provide the same kind of specs and info found in the main one. For example, slim specific dimensions would be fine, but non-specific things like conectivity=wi-fi would not. I only really mention it as you seem to be quite active in the video game articles, so thought you should be brought up-to speed to stop you making the same mistake again. AlphathonTM (talk) 08:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Logitech Brake and Accelerate pedal.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Logitech Brake and Accelerate pedal.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 01:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS3 Headset[edit]

It would seem we cross paths again. As far as I am aware the Bluetooth Headset cannot exclusivelly sync with Sony Ericsson, and it makes no sense since it works acording to a standard - vendor locking would require a propriatery system (or for the standard to support locking, which it doesn't). I have removed it as it is an unsubstanciated claim. If you can provide evidence of this then feel free to re-post it with citation. (I cannot test this as my phone happens to be a Sony Ericsson...go figure). AlphathonTM (talk) 10:58, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Racing wheel templates[edit]

I have nominated Category:Racing wheel templates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:Video game hardware templates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:05, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:PlayStation 3 AC Adapter.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:PlayStation 3 AC Adapter.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/kotaku/2008/11/charger.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:PlayStation 3 AC Adapter.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:PlayStation 3 AC Adapter.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Seriously, stop uploading non-free images for things that you are not allowed to. AlphathonTM (talk) 15:04, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Logitech dfgt 01.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Logitech dfgt 01.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://techgage.com/viewimg/?img=/reviews/logitech/driving_force_gt_ps3/logitech_dfgt_01.jpg&desc=Logitech%20Driving%20Force%20GT%20-%20Playstation%203%20Racing%20Wheel. As a copyright violation, File:Logitech dfgt 01.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Logitech dfgt 01.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AlphathonTM (talk) 16:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Logitech dfgt 02.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Logitech dfgt 02.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://techgage.com/viewimg/?img=/reviews/logitech/driving_force_gt_ps3/logitech_dfgt_02.jpg&desc=Logitech%20Driving%20Force%20GT%20-%20Playstation%203%20Racing%20Wheel. As a copyright violation, File:Logitech dfgt 02.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Logitech dfgt 02.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AlphathonTM (talk) 16:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Logitech dfgt 03.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Logitech dfgt 03.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://techgage.com/viewimg/?img=/reviews/logitech/driving_force_gt_ps3/logitech_dfgt_03.jpg&desc=Logitech%20Driving%20Force%20GT%20-%20Playstation%203%20Racing%20Wheel. As a copyright violation, File:Logitech dfgt 03.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Logitech dfgt 03.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AlphathonTM (talk) 16:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Logitech dfgt 04.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Logitech dfgt 04.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://techgage.com/viewimg/?img=/reviews/logitech/driving_force_gt_ps3/logitech_dfgt_04.jpg&desc=Logitech%20Driving%20Force%20GT%20-%20Playstation%203%20Racing%20Wheel. As a copyright violation, File:Logitech dfgt 04.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Logitech dfgt 04.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AlphathonTM (talk) 16:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Logitech dfgt 05.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Logitech dfgt 05.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://techgage.com/viewimg/?img=/reviews/logitech/driving_force_gt_ps3/logitech_dfgt_05.jpg&desc=Logitech%20Driving%20Force%20GT%20-%20Playstation%203%20Racing%20Wheel. As a copyright violation, File:Logitech dfgt 05.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Logitech dfgt 05.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AlphathonTM (talk) 16:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Logitech dfgt 06.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Logitech dfgt 06.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://techgage.com/viewimg/?img=/reviews/logitech/driving_force_gt_ps3/logitech_dfgt_06.jpg&desc=Logitech%20Driving%20Force%20GT%20-%20Playstation%203%20Racing%20Wheel. As a copyright violation, File:Logitech dfgt 06.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Logitech dfgt 06.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AlphathonTM (talk) 16:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Logitech dfgt 07.jpg[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Logitech dfgt 07.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://techgage.com/viewimg/?img=/reviews/logitech/driving_force_gt_ps3/logitech_dfgt_07.jpg&desc=Logitech%20Driving%20Force%20GT%20-%20Playstation%203%20Racing%20Wheel. As a copyright violation, File:Logitech dfgt 07.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Logitech dfgt 07.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. AlphathonTM (talk) 16:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Formula One notes sections[edit]

A recent policty of the WikiProject Formula One‎ is the removal of all Notes sections per WP:TRIVIA. Where possible the notes are being incorporated into either the infobox at the top, or into the text of the article. If the note is of a trivial nature, particularly those of minor statistical achievement of individual drivers, they are being deleted. Please do not add notes sections, or additional notes, but please consider adding important details to the text desacribing the races.

Thank you for your attention. --Falcadore (talk) 01:48, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A reminder that this request was left for you back in April. --Falcadore (talk) 01:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Another reminder. --Falcadore (talk) 00:08, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And again. No more "Notes" please! --Falcadore (talk) 05:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ProStreet[edit]

Please don't replace platform-neutral (or PC) artwork with artwork from a specific console, as you did on Need for Speed: ProStreet. Thanks! Fin©™ 10:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Pro Evolution Soccer 2010 logo.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Pro Evolution Soccer 2010 logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 00:48, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NFSProStreetPS3Cover.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NFSProStreetPS3Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:NASCAR_2000_PlayStation_Coverart.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:NASCAR_2000_PlayStation_Coverart.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 02:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NASCAR Lists[edit]

Hello. Please don't add lists of information (drivers/tracks etc) to articles, they're considered gamecruft. Thanks! Fin©™ 07:36, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page PlayStation Portable worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you.  GSK (talk ● evidence) 07:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We must only be as precise as necessary in article naming[edit]

Hi. I appreciate your attempt to make Wikipedia more organized by moving the article titled Tiger Woods PGA Tour (video game) to Tiger Woods PGA Tour (iPhone video game), however this doesn't really match with the naming conventions for articles. As per WP:PRECISION, we should only be as precise as needed. There is no other video game named "Tiger Woods PGA Tour", and therefore the disambiguator in the title should simply be "video game". Also, it is improper to note this as simply an "iPhone game", as this is not true. The game is for the iPhone OS, which runs on the iPhone and iPod Touch as well as the iPad. Unlike other gaming systems, the operating system is not tied to only one set of hardware. It is for these reasons that I will request that the article be switched back to its original name. Let me know if you have any questions. Brian Reading (talk) 16:57, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Racing trivia[edit]

Hi. Please could you stop adding trivia to Formula One racing articles. It might help if you read WP:TRIVIA, which provides some tips on what to include and what not. We are a general interest encyclopedia, designed to entertain and inform a casual reader. We are not a miscellany or a cruft dumping ground. Pyrope 14:57, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I see that up the page you have already been contacted about this. As yu seem to be having some difficulty in realising what is and isn't trivial, I suggest that any time you are tempted to add something to a "Notes" section you resist. Pyrope 15:51, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, who are you?[edit]

You know you can write something about yourself at your user page, don't you? It's always nice to be able to read something about people you meet here at Wikipedia. ;-) John Anderson (talk) 01:44, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Technical Specifications[edit]

Hi mate. I'm sorry, but I've deleted the 'Technical Specifications' sections you've added to Ferrari F2007, and McLaren MP4/22 and 23. There are two problems with what you added. Firstly, it largely duplicates what's in the infobox, which is intended to contain the technical specifications of the cars. If you want to go into more detail about the car, the text of the article is the place to do, not another list of bits. Secondly, there's far too much detail on suppliers etc which is all pretty meaningless to most readers without any context. Don't forget that we are a general purpose encyclopedia, not a statistics site or an F1 fansite.

Have a look at Brabham BT19 or Maserati MC12 for examples of a car articles that have been peer reviewed by the Wikipedia community and made it up to Featured Article status. There's a lot of prose about the car, but not too much listing of suppliers and sponsors. 4u1e (talk) 06:07, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I've also deleted the technical specification section from the Champ Car article. I can't see how giving the spec of one car (Panoz?) out of the many different types that have competed under different rules over more than 30 years is relevant to an article on a race series like this. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 19:29, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Same for all the F3 articles. It might be reasonable to put in a section on current technical specifications for those series, although bear in mind that there is some variety in chassis in all of them, even if it is only between different Dallaras. The GP2 series article is a mess. Because this is a spec series, it makes much more sense to have a 'Technical specifications' section. However there's massive duplication of information between the existing information on the cars and the section you added. I'd suggest going through and merging the two sections together properly. I'll leave off this topic now as I feel like I'm hounding you. It's good that you want to add information to Wikipedia, but I suggest you read the articles on notability and referencing, and think about about how the information you have can be integrated into the articles in a way that is meaningful for readers. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 19:49, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You reverted me without discussing the changes above. Your history of editing mostly numbers and names, but not text, suggests that you cannot understand English very well - I can only suggest you stop reverting changes by other editors if you do not understand the reasons they give. 4u1e (talk) 23:08, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On a similar topic, I'm not sure where you are getting your information about fuels used for F1 cars but they appear to be quite wrong. Please stop changing infobox details when you have no evidence. Pyrope 15:42, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Part 2[edit]

You have been given link to discussion on this issue here. If you don't take part, then why is it not going to keep getting reverted? --Falcadore (talk) 04:56, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aliff Aziz[edit]

A tag has been placed on Aliff Aziz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 09:27, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Julius Erving, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Ocaasi (talk) 08:35, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Jordan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DH85868993 (talk) 10:04, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User warning[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mercedes-Benz C-Class. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Look you're a good contributor, but you're trying really hard to get blocked from editting. Can't you see where this is going? --Falcadore (talk) 06:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You have been warned by several users now. Stop reverting or you will be blocked from editing. The359 (Talk) 06:23, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I have to ask, did you not understand why all these long list of technical specific was not appropriate for these articles? You got suspended for this. --Falcadore (talk) 03:06, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

pp-office template[edit]

Did you read the instructions for the ues of this template? It says "This template is not to be used as a bluff. Only use it on OFFICE PROTECTED pages. Please note that only administrators can protect pages."

Do not try this again. --Falcadore (talk) 06:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Please stop editing the article, if editing, i will block you." You are not an admin, you can not implement such a block. You have been invited many times to participate in discussion, please do so. --Falcadore (talk) 07:06, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The359 (Talk) 07:11, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do not threaten people with blocks, you are not an administrator and you have no ability to block anyone. You do not own these articles and you cannot demand that your edits remain. The359 (Talk) 07:11, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:Falcadore. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The359 (Talk) 07:13, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add invisible notes into article-space pages asking to discuss articles on talk pages when you routinely ignore talk pages. Please do not request edittors behave in a civil fashion when you routinely do not. I ask you to participate in the discussions you actually suggest to others. --Falcadore (talk) 07:18, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Audi A4, you will be blocked from editing. Tbhotch™ © Happy New Year 07:23, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. KrakatoaKatie 07:39, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lotus[edit]

Don't move a page while there's a discussion going on, in which no consensus has been reached - suggest that you read some guidelines. Bretonbanquet (talk) 15:00, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sauber C14[edit]

Ah, so you are able to converse with other editors. I was wondering, given that despite the vast number of problems raised here, you almost never respond.

Regarding Sauber, I'm afraid the sponsorship situation makes it a bit confusing, but according to the sources I looked at (Autocourse and Chicanef1), Sauber used fuel provied by Elf. The Petronas thing was purely sponsorship - it's not that unusual. After all, this year's Renault carried Lada stickers but did not use an engine from that company. If you have any evidence other than the stickers on the rear wing that the team did use Petronas fuel, then by all means let's discuss it.

Please don't use admin templates to threaten other editors. You're not an admin and don't have any ability to block me. You wouldn't even be able to persuade someone else to do it, since I have done nothing other than make an edit you personally don't like.

You've recently been blocked yourself, and making silly threats like that will probably get you blocked again. And if you keep on doing them, eventually you'll get blocked permanently, which would be a shame, since you seem to enjoy editing here. 4u1e (talk) 07:09, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've got the fuel confirmed by another editor with good sources - it was definitely Elf for 1995. The article is now referenced to that effect. If you're interested, I believe Elf also supplied fuel in 1996, then Shell took over with the swap to Ferrari engines in 1997 before Petronas did start supplying fuel in 1999. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 15:21, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2001 Belgian Grand Prix[edit]

Don't add notes like the Benetton into Renault note, that are already in the story. It would be beneficial for you to pay closer attention to what you are editting. --Falcadore (talk) 09:21, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking[edit]

Hi. You may find it useful to read WP:OVERLINK. In particular, generally we only link words on the first occurence. (This doesn't apply to tables of results, where it is normal to link on each occurence.) We also do not wikilink dates any more. I hope this is helpful. 4u1e (talk) 02:20, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Jacques Villeneuve 2005 San Marino.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jacques Villeneuve 2005 San Marino.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

You have already been warned before about adding excessive amounts of statistics to race car articles. The previous warnings still stand, and you are being warned again now, that your continued addition of these excessive statistics and your edit warring in articles in order to retain your previous edits could lead to your account being blocked. Please stop this as your edits will continue to be reverted as you have yet to participate in any discussions regarding your behaviour. The359 (Talk) 06:27, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2004 Formula One season[edit]

Why did you add Wilux to Minardi's official name ? Maimai009 12:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Specifications, again[edit]

Why are you having to be warned about this yet again? You have been told repeatedly to stop doing this. It does not matter that the data is sourced, it is overly trivial and does not belong on this page. We already have templates for important elements of race car data that exist on numerous articles. I suggest you look into it. The359 (Talk) 09:26, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally you seem to need reminding that the article is about the Ferrari F430. The GT2 and GT3 models represent a very small percentage of F430 production. Preference should always be given to data about mainstream models over minor run specialised editions. Detailed specifications of limited run vehicles should not be given preferential treatment over the primary model.
The above should not be taken as an invitation to add GT2 specifications, after adding F430 specifications, as that would still run against the trivial nature of such additions. This data is much more appropriate to a Wiki optimised for high performance cars and/or motor racing rather than Wikipedia. --Falcadore (talk) 09:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Logitech g27 01.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Logitech g27 01.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alphathon /'æɫ.fə.θɒn/ (talk) 04:23, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:F1 games dino[edit]

Template:F1 games dino has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NSH002 (talk) 14:51, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Logitech Driving Force GT for PS3.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logitech Driving Force GT for PS3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:JavaMegathrust[edit]

Template:JavaMegathrust has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dawnseeker2000 02:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of IndyCar Series (video game) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IndyCar Series (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IndyCar Series (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 22:40, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Languages of Africa (categories)[edit]

Template:Languages of Africa (categories) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 13:51, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Languages of Africa (category)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Languages of Africa (category) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- AquaDTRS (talk) 16:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Famous Malaysian Chinese.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Famous Malaysian Chinese.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:32, 5 March 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:32, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Seventh generation racing wheels[edit]

Template:Seventh generation racing wheels has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:45, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Luph25&oldid=1200942871"