User talk:Luk/Archives/2009/10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Appears to be back, as User:The Chief Of Dripping Tapwater. I have filed an SPI here. I would like a CU run publicly--whoever is beginning this harassment needs to be banned. → ROUX  01:50, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Er, by publicly I mean a proper SPI, not public revelation of the CU technical data. → ROUX  01:51, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Replied on this user's talk page - 08:01, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
If you can't figure out why they'd be doing it, it would seem that they are an established editor? This sort of socking is completely unacceptable. Please have another CU review your findings; I've seen editors driven from the project by long-term harassment and I don't want to see it happen here, for tolerably obvious reasons. Wikipedia needs to crack down on abusive sockpuppetry, and this fits the definition: it's a waste of time directed at one specific editor. (reply here, I'm watching) → ROUX  13:00, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Replied on this user's talk page - 14:20, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
I replied on my talkpage. Can we please keep this in one place? That would be why I asked you to respond here. I hate fragmented conversations. → ROUX  14:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Cheese

Cheeses are cool but School Blocks are no fun :-(--64.15.147.70 (talk) 18:27, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

I completely agree! Unfortunately, school vandalism is not fun either for the people having to clean up afterwards. Hey, the best way you can avoid that is by registering an account for yourself! :) (Alternatively, you can slap your schoolmates repeatedly until the idea of not writing "is Gay" on articles sinks in ;) -- Luk talk 06:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Bot speed

Roughly how long does it take for your bot to go though an image that's intended to be transferred to the commons? Some of the ones I've transferred have been on your page longer than others. ----DanTD (talk) 00:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

The bot is semi automatic: it builds a list of likely candidates, and I go through them before I approve the run. I sometimes forget to give it a nod so it never starts the task ;). Some images are not deletable at all and show up at each run, because it can't find a way to orphan them (and me neither, that often happens with parametrized templates). -- Luk talk 06:37, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi Luk. I can't believe I missed that! I double checked my the images before deleting them, but, apparently that wasn't enough. I've made the fix. I appreciate you letting me know. Regards, FASTILY (TALK) 22:11, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Hmm...

I'm guessing you don't like fishsticks. Coolman1250 (talk) 22:05, 15 October 2009 (UTC)