User talk:Lspsurfer

Welcome!

Hello, Lspsurfer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 22:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Nakon 22:02, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself, as you did at Sigma Kappa Alpha. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you.

In the case of an article about your fraternity, you'll need to show that it's a notable organization. Please note that typically articles about single-chapter local fraternities are not deemed to be notable, unless there is something unusual in their history and there is substantial coverage of it in independent reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 22:34, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you hit the nail on the head in your reply on my talk page:

people don't know enough about our fraternity to make a complete wikipedia article

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia about subjects that are already notable. You can't put an article on Wikipedia in the hopes of making the subject more notable/popular/well-known. (If the Foundation had a dime for every garage band that did that…) For what it's worth, I just did a Google search on the string "Sigma Kappa Alpha" and got no relevant hits. Google hits don't equate to notability, but if I can't find secondary sources (or primary sources!) with a Google search, it stands to reason that there are no sources to verify any claims that would be made in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:10, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]