User talk:LordwolfgangCreek

Welcome![edit]

Hello, LordwolfgangCreek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 01:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Bobby Creekwater has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bobby Creekwater was changed by LordwolfgangCreek (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852211 on 2014-01-03T00:48:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Bobby Creekwater, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I've reverted the biography back to the prior, sourced version. —C.Fred (talk) 01:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful editing if you have a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, LordwolfgangCreek. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Bobby Creekwater, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:12, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LordwolfgangCreek, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi LordwolfgangCreek! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]