User talk:LongBay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, LongBay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair 12:24, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Please Use Edit Summaries[edit]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Squirepants101 23:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Ed Edd n Eddy[edit]

The image you posted to List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy has been removed. The image is from a video game, and has nothing at all to do with the cartoon, which is what this article is about. It's always wise to read the article's discussion page before adding such things. -- 67.117.25.182 02:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just watched the episode "Hold It Lazlo" on Cartoon Network Video (as an exclusive premiere) and in the credits, it does say that Jodi Benson voices a character named Porp, so you were right about Porp existing in Camp Lazlo, but the character is probably not that notable to warrant an article by itself. Squirepants101 23:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Myrtle Bay[edit]

Your note "The articles Holmestown Road, Farrow Parkway, Grissom Parkway, and Conway Bypass contest much sources, notability, and information as the world knows. The articles are OK, so uhh duh." on my user page, apart from failing in the basic Wikipedia principle of civility, appears top make no sense. Please clarify. Kevin McE 20:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Again, please use edit summaries[edit]

I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! Squirepants101 23:27, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How is Adam thirteen?![edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of characters from My Gym Partner's a Monkey. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Squirepants101 04:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop immediately. If you continue to vandalise pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to List of minor characters in The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Squirepants101 15:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Advice on uploading images[edit]

Hello!

Thanks for uploading some pictures to Wikipedia. I wanted to make sure you were aware of some of the requirements and good practices for uploaded images.

  • Pick an image name.
When uploading an image, pick a file name that is descriptive, and unique. Remember that many images may be uploaded about the same topic, and remember that names are case sensitive.
  • Source the image.
On the image description page, explain where the image came from. If you created the image yourself, then say so. If it's from the web, give a URL. If it's a screenshot of a movie or game, or a scan from a book, give the title.
  • Provide copyright and license information.
This part is a little bit trickier, but it's very important. The copyright of the image generally belongs to whomever created it.
If it's a photograph you took, or an image you created (modifying an image that already exists doesn't count) in software like Photoshop or GIMP, then you own the copyright. To upload it to Wikipedia, you must agree to license it under the GFDL (which allows anyone to use it, but requires that they give credit to the original author and requires that any further edit to the image be licensed under the GFDL as well) or release it into the public domain (which allows anyone to use it for any purpose without restriction.) Do this by placing an appropriate tag on the image description page, like {{GFDL}} or {{PD-self}}. Be sure to mention that you created the image. If you're using {{PD-self}}, you may also want to use {{NoRightsReserved}}, since there is some dispute as to whether one may grant items into the public domain.
If you didn't create the image, or the copyright somehow belongs to another party (like a screenshot, which you might "create", but the copyright belongs to the author of the movie or video game), then you need to find another tag that describes the copyright status of the image. Images used on Wikipedia need to be free for our use and the use of sites which reproduce our content. This means that images cannot have a restriction such as "only for use by Wikipedia", or "for non-commercial use only", or "for educational use". Images without a free license may be usable in certain articles under fair use, but such a use should be justified on the image description page.
  • Describe the image.
To another reader, the image may not be immediately understood. A caption in an article doesn't explain the image to a visitor who sees it on its image page. Put a brief explanation of what is in the image on the image description page, similar to what you might include in a caption on an article.

Some links to Wikipedia pages on this subject:

Copyrights, Copyright tags, Fair use, Image description page, Public domain, Images for deletion, Possibly unfree images, Copyright problems, Uploading images

Thanks again for your contributions. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at my talk page. Squirepants101 23:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Miltakasheldonthehippo.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Miltakasheldonthehippo.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New York City[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with the page New York City on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. // PoeticDecay 00:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Town of Hilton Head Island[edit]

Actually, there is a point. That's the Town's official name. See the Town's official website.[1] MoodyGroove 01:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)MoodyGroove[reply]


Prince Creek[edit]

I've sent it to an AfD so it can be more widely reviewed > Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Creek Cornell Rockey 15:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Created page[edit]

A tag has been placed on Magiquest, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Xiahou 01:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attempts to add images to List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy[edit]

Looks like your links are broken, more than once. You were also asked to stop attempting to add images of minor characters, as they are not needed. There is a single image that addresses all the minor characters. There is no need for single images of these characters. Thank you. -- Elaich 05:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Meatman.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Meatman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Snakey1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Snakey1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:MulberryMigrates.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:MulberryMigrates.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


An article that you created, TPC of Myrtle Beach, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TPC of Myrtle Beach Thank you. SkierRMH 20:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:ParentsDay.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:ParentsDay.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SocasteeHS.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SocasteeHS.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:01, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:MyrtleBeachPelicans.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:MyrtleBeachPelicans.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:NigelSlothworm.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:NigelSlothworm.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:GrandeDunesBridge.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:GrandeDunesBridge.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, LongBay. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:American Dad.jpg) was found at the following location: User:LongBay. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hedgehogcamperignitous.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hedgehogcamperignitous.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Fredthewalrus.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fredthewalrus.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:BATBMB.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BATBMB.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:CoastalGrandMall.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CoastalGrandMall.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:ColonialMall.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ColonialMall.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Streisand effect[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Streisand effect. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. — Feezo (Talk) 18:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kif L. Kroker[edit]

Hi, just found your edit to Kif Kroker from a few weeks ago (adding the middle initial), when was this mentioned in the show? - Quolnok 16:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:InletSquare.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:InletSquare.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St. James Elementary School[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article St. James Elementary School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on Template:User WikiProjectMyrtleBeach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MBAirport.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MBAirport.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 17:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Crescent Beach, South Carolina, you will be blocked from editing. Nyttend (talk) 19:57, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Cherry Grove Beach, South Carolina. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Nyttend (talk) 11:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Nyttend (talk) 04:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LongBay (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

First of all, I was making useful contributions. And you always revert any constructive edits I do. I live in the Myrtle Beach area, i would know more about it. I was blocked for putting communities on a template, which should be on there somewhere anyways!

Decline reason:

Trying to delete your past history of warnings and blocks, combined with not acknowledging the reason why you were blocked again is not a good way to get unblocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Conway-Horry County Airport, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.horrycounty.org/depts/airports. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Chip and Skip[edit]

A tag has been placed on Chip and Skip requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Paper Luigi TalkContributions 01:48, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Hey Arnold characters[edit]

An article you have edited may be deleted. Take a look: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lila Sawyer Hellerick (talk) 11:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Holmestown Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable county road that does not pass the USRD notability guidelines or WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Admrboltz (talk) 20:35, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Malcolm/Userboxes/Butt, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Malcolm/Userboxes/Butt and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Malcolm/Userboxes/Butt during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 17:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Joe White Avenue[edit]

You appear to have an interest in Myrtle Beach roads. I'm not quite sure whether Mr. Joe White Avenue meets the notability criteria, but I invite you to contribute to User:Vchimpanzee/Mr. Joe White Avenue In the meantime. I don't actually know where it begins, and I need to do further research into the construction and its completion. I was having trouble with NewsBank at the one library where it's free and didn't pursue certain details further. Besides, a search for this topic gives me a bunch of stuff I don't want, and not in order either.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:40, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BATBMB.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BATBMB.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:13, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Robert Grissom Parkway, Myrtle Beach.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]