User talk:Londo06/Archive 11

Images

What images? нмŵוτнτ 15:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, if and when this is resolved, I can restore the images. нмŵוτнτ 15:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem, just let me know. нмŵוτнτ 15:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Sandbox

I should have deleted it as nonsense but I have been kind and moved /Sandbox3 to User:Londo06/Sandbox3. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 07:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Karl Filiga

The infobox may be derived from a soccer template, but it is the RL one that we use. The template also states Professional club appearances and points counted for domestic first grade only. Being contracted to the Bulldogs lower grades doesn't count as first-grade. This issue came up a while back - I think it was discussed on the project talk page - as to what constitutes first-grade in other countries. Here it is NRL, City/Origin, State, International. Maybe we should open the discussion again with some input from the UK pov - but as long as we are clear on what constitutes first-grade for a player in Australia, in the UK (ie, does your second-tier count as first-grade and what happens when a first-tier club is relegated?) - and France, which I find equally confusing. It would be so much easier to be all working with an understanding of Southern vs Northern rather than this perpetual toing and froing, there are more constructive things to do, imo. •Florrie•leave a note• 16:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

I totally agree that information shouldn't be limited to first-grade or reined in, but there is plenty of room to do that within the article rather than the infobox. There's already been some discussion about the number of fields being used in the infobox at the template discussion page - that's probably a good place to bring it up or at the project discussion page. There's also an archived discussion here on notability that didn't go anywhere and another here. My personal opinion is that there is more than enough to do on the project without introducing articles on players who haven't yet had a sniff of first-grade - unless there is something to make them notable like being plucked from premier league to play Origin! Cheers, •Florrie•leave a note• 00:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter — Issue XXII (December 2007)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XXII (December 2007)
Project news The Intelligence task force has been created. The contest department has completed its ninth month of competition. The top scorer this month is Blnguyen, with 22 points, followed by Dreamafter, with 8 points, and Redmarkviolinist, with 6 points. Blnguyen also remains the overall leader, with 162 points in total. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries. Help with converting deprecated infoboxes is needed; any assistance is welcome! {{WPMILHIST}} now supports an explicit tag (class=DAB) for marking disambiguation pages.	Articles of note New featured articles: Battle of Albuera Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081) Battle of the Gebora Constantine II of Scotland Francis Harvey Vasa (ship) Wulfhere of Mercia New A-Class articles: 1962 South Vietnamese Presidential Palace bombing Evacuation of East Prussia
Current proposals and discussions A discussion about minimizing terminological ambiguity has begun.
Awards and honors Blnguyen has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles. Woodym555 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic. For their outstanding efforts as part of Tag & Assess 2007, Bedford, TomStar81, and Parsival74 have been awarded the gold, silver, and bronze Wikis, respectively.
Tag & Assess 2007 Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows: 1. Bedford — 7,600 2. TomStar81 — 5,500 3. Parsival74 — 5,200 4. FayssalF — 3,500 5. Roger Davies — 3,000 6. Ouro — 2600 7. Kateshortforbob — 2250 8. Cromdog — 2,200 9. BrokenSphere — 2000 9. Jacksinterweb — 2,000 9. Maralia — 2,000 12. MBK004 — 1,340 13. JKBrooks85 — 1,250 14. Sniperz11 — 1100 15. Burzmali — 1000 15. Cplakidas — 1000 15. Gimme danger — 1000 15. Raoulduke471000 15. TicketMan — 1000 15. Welsh — 1000 15. Blnguyen — 1000 Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes. We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-participants alike are very welcome and appreciated.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

Note: This newsletter was automatically delivered. Regards from the automated, Anibot (talk) 23:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject rugby union

Hi, and welcome to the Rugby union WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to rugby union.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPRU Announcements}} there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, peer review, and a collaboration of the fortnight.
• We have a Fiji rugby task force that focus on Fiji related rugby union articles.
• Our requests page has extensive lists of requested articles.
• We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorisation, and other issues that you may find useful.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Shudde ^talk 03:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)