User talk:Lkskwlkr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lkskwlkr (talk) 18:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)== Welcome! ==[reply]

Hello, Lkskwlkr! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "Lkskwlkr (talk) 18:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 06:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Lkskwlkr is a username created in the digital world by me, Dale Gary Forsyth. I am trying to find my way in a world that is constantly working against me. I am asking for help and not getting what I ask for. I am also asking to be given back to me everything that has been stolen from or kept from me. I only want what is mine.

Lkskwlkr (talk) 15:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

why is there still a reluctance and fear by most to tell it like it is and stop pretending like we are just learning everything for the first time? I am so bored out of my brains and could be achieving so much more but humans and tech want to play this stupid game of stupidity. How can i get my bank account to show $20000000 today so that i can have a break and have some fun and smiles with carlie?--Lkskwlkr (talk) 08:17, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that's not an actionable request for help. I'm beginning to wonder if you are actually here to help build an encyclopedia. WP is not a social networking site.
Also, there's no need to sign your entries on your user page. The main point of signatures is to help keep track of who said what on talk and discussion pages. For the most part, you should be the only one editing your user page. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 08:39, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

importScript('User:Evad37/Custom_GeoHack_replacement.js'); // User:Evad37/Custom GeoHack replacement.js Lkskwlkr (talk) 08:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That won't work here. Perhaps on your User:Lkskwlkr/common.js page? — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 08:39, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have as much or more more to offer to WP than people from a position of misguided superiority, who will deem me to be inappropriate and reckless because I don't follow the RULES. The problem I face is having solved the universal quantum equation before wikipedia even existed and now knowing what i know i have to wait, monotonously twiddling my thumbs waiting for the universe to catch up. If you follow the rules then you never explore anything. Lkskwlkr (talk) 08:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have you published your solution elsewhere, or were you waiting for Wikipedia to exist? —Tamfang (talk) 08:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Echoing what Tamfang said, if you have made some remarkable discovery it's dumb for you to be posting it on wikipedia. Wikipedia simply is not the place for that sort of thing. People here are mostly not interested and the people who will be most interested generally hang out elsewhere. Once you've posted your remarkable discovery elsewhere, e.g. arXiv and everyone starts talking about it because it's a remarkable discovery, then it will make it's way here. Also while there may be places where does who are completely unable to follow rules are welcome, wikipedia isn't one of them. (Someone else may point out we aren't rule based, but while that is true, there are standards, policies and guidelines people do often have to follow and those who are completely unable to follow them do not succeed here.) People who are very bad at following 'rules' but do have useful contribs are often given some leeway but there is still a limit. Frankly though, those people are in an extreme minority. Far more common are those who think they have amazing contributions but are poor at following rules, however we find these people actually make few useful contributions whatever their personal beliefs about their abilities or knowledge and most of what we get are problems. Nil Einne (talk) 09:02, 23 February 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Wow the warmth and welcoming embrace is overwhelming. All I am attempting to do is contribute and help this universe. Silly me. I apologize for the inconvenience to everyone. Have a nice journey.

Speedy deletion nomination of The Open Source Science Project[edit]

Hello Lkskwlkr,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Open Source Science Project for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Slatersteven (talk) 14:09, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]