User talk:Ljs90

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A page you started (Jan Vanriet) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Jan Vanriet, Ljs90!

Wikipedia editor Salimfadhley just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Interesting article about an interesting subject. You should add categories to your article so that people can find it more easily.

To reply, leave a comment on Salimfadhley's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Notability[edit]

Upon second consideration and review of sources I have withdrew the tag, the subject seems notable. To help, I'd recommend you read WP:ARTIST and post on Talk:Jan Vanriet an short paragraph on which sources / awards / etc. seem to help the article fulfill the requirements listed there. Thank you for your contribution, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:00, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Jan Vanriet[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jan Vanriet, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://janvanrietcom.webhosting.be/en/biography/ http://janvanrietcom.webhosting.be/en/biography/2/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Jan Vanriet saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Just follow the steps 1, 2 and 3 as shown and fill in the details

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

  1. While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
  2. Then click on "templates",
  3. Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
  4. If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:16, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Edward Hopper, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. freshacconci (✉) 14:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to this on your talk page. The source I provided is reliable, from a peer-reviewed art historical journal The Burlington Magazine. This is verified new research correcting older information and should be included in the main wiki text.

Edward Hopper[edit]

You removed a source, adding a new unverified source and are engaging in an editing dispute. You are required to discuss this suggested change on the article talk page without reverting further. freshacconci (✉) 14:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC) I have done so, on the article talk page.[reply]