User talk:Liance/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 ← Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 → Archive 10

[Opinion needed] Proper name for the draft

[Update] After some discussion with other tech guys at Reddit I think I will leave the name of the draft as is. Eventually google and other search engines will start to index "moleculer" and they will stop assuming that it's a typo.

[Original] Hey Lance. A couple of weeks ago I've created a draft article but now I'm thinking that its name might not be the best. I'll try to explain why. The draft is called "Moleculer" (it's a microservices framework). However, when googling for "Moleculer" the search engine assumes that it's a typo and searches for "molecular" with an "A". As a result it shows a lot of biology related results. So, this time search engine indexing algorithms are not helping at all.

To avoid this issue and to, somewhat, provide better search results I was thinking to change the name of the draft to "Moleculer (microservices framework)". What do you think? Would it help?

PS: I've also added some references (including an IEEE article) to the draft as you've asked.

AndMaz (talk) 20:18, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft: dbWatch

Hi Liance,

Good day!

I really need your help as the comment you've made regarding the secondary/reliable source. I've included links from reliable websites that reviewed the dbWatch company. And I don't have any secondary sources but only those websites mentioned in my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonysy191 (talk • contribs) 11:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC) How can I workaround with this issue?


Your feedback will be very much appreciated Thank you very much!

Best Regards,

Tony

A kitten for you!

Thank you for the advice

Gang 5g (talk) 08:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Rejection of e-commerce platform article

My article of e-commerce platform was rejected. E-commerce and e-commerce platform are two different topics. The article with title 'E-commerce platform' was one of the requested articles on Wikipedia. The second reason you mentioned was link farm to two websites. I took the idea from the websites and then wrote in my own words. Another thing that can be done is to include my article under E-commerce. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smitpshah17 (talk • contribs) 03:08, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

SYSML Version 1.5

Lian,

I has been trying to publish the SYSML Version 1.5 document to the wikipedia website (1 September 2019) and did not get your approval since it is a copy right document. Do you mind if I send you the permission message from the copy right owner? I already loaded that permission message from the owner of that wikipedia document but you might not see it somehow. I try to share this information to the wiki audience so they can learn the new method and specification to work on Model Based System Engineering. Also after I get your approval to publish it, I will modify the format to make it more user friendly using the anchor command and hyperlink. Please let me know how I can send the original owner message to you. Note that if this option fails I think the only option left is the owner to load the document to Wikipedia by himself.

Thanks.

V/r CDR Charles Nguyen, USN — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jolenep99 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Jolenep99 - Wikipedia highly discourages and prohibits the use of non-free content, so I would advise against attempting to obtain permission from the copyright holder since any content hosted on the wiki should be licensed freely. Is that document vital to the subject you are writing about? You could try to exclude it from your draft, or substitute it with your own words/other free sources. Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 17:07, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft: Marsha Mazz

Hello Liance, I was hoping you could take a look at my article again. It has not been viewed for a month and a half. If you have some time, I would love to get the chance again? Thank you! AleitheaAnne (talk) 21:42, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft: Luis Dato

Hello. There has been a confusion about my draft and the article Luis Dato. I am quite new in the wikipedia and i did not know the rules well. i deeply apologize. I intentionally moved the Draft:Luis Dato to the Article section. The article has been revised by other contributors to a point that it was almost perfect. And then it was deleted. The worse thing is that a couple of websites has already reference (or copied) it. Anyway, I revised the Draft: Luis Dato to the wikipedia's standard. Please review it. Thank you so much. And I apologize again for the move. Stephentalla (talk) 03:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Stephentalla, everything seems to have worked out with the article for Luis Dato on the mainspace right now. Thank you for your contributions and please let me know if you have any questions! -Liancetalk/contribs 17:08, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello Liance, thank you for the help. i Have a question though, why is the article not indexed by Google search? Thanks. Stephentalla (talk) 06:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Google indexing can be slow and it might take a while for it to show up there - I don't think this is something the wiki can really control but it should show up sooner or later. -Liancetalk/contribs 14:13, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, Liance! Stephentalla (talk) 14:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Al Krevis Article.

If you have the time to review and help me edit my article so it may get posted I'd greatly appreciate it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnny234424 (talk • contribs) 16:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article has been accepted by another reviewer. -Liancetalk/contribs 14:19, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Kostja Horvat

Hello!

My article has been declined several times now and i wonder as to why. Another user was claiming youtube links are not reliable source's - which is fair. Therefore i removed them and found as much credible sites as possible to back up the information. In this case its several clubs confirming the identity of a player in their records so i am not really sure what more information i can provide. I added youtube links so that the player can be seen playing for a club which should be the most credible source of all.

Please let me know how i can improve this article enough to get approved.

regards

Hi Thesoccerex, I would recommend you take a look at WP:NN and WP:NSPORT and add reliable sources that fit those criteria. YouTube is not a usable source under WP:UGC. -Liancetalk/contribs 14:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC)


And thats why i removed youtube links and only added very reliable sources, so the question still stands why is it not getting approved

regards

HSCC Journal

Liance, sorry to sound rude but your rejection of my HSCC submission is somewhat absurd. I suggest you consider other 'Journal' entries in Wikipedia and you will see that I have virtually copied HSCC in a similar style (as best I could). I shouldn't have to point out the obvious similarity for comparison, but if it is necessary, take a look at the 'Journal of Religion and Health' which I have helped to edit and which was improved again by another Wikipedia editor. References / links for verifiability have been included - LC — Preceding unsigned comment added by LinzCarey (talk • contribs) 15:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi LinzCarey, at the time of my review your draft article did not include any inline citations and only external links to primary sources, which means it failed WP:NN. Right now the entry better reflects necessary criteria and would be a better candidate for acceptance. Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 14:18, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Liance, please note the official Health and Social Care Chaplaincy (HSCC) website for the journal.https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/HSCC. I have tried my best to copy the lay out on Wikipedia as per a similar entry for the Journal of Religion and Health. Please assist me to get this HSCC page on Wikipedia up and running.

Thank you.

Thank you. This is the first article I've written, so I am still learning all the rights and wrongs. I appreciate your help! WendyRuss (talk) 19:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you and question

Hi! first of all, I would like to thank you for reviewing my draft! (draft:Gesa Credit Union) Secondly, I had a question. I wasn't quite sure if you said that the topic isn't significant enough, or if I just need second-party citations. Could you provide some clarity? Thanks again for taking your time to review and respond! Puddleglum2.0👌 (talk) 02:51, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Puddleglum2.0, notability on the wiki is judged by certain criteria, which includes multiple independent, secondary, reliable sources that show significant coverage. Right now, your draft only includes sources that are affiliated with the subject, so you would need to add more independent sources to meet that criteria. Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 14:16, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Yes it does, thanks a lot! Puddleglum2.0👌 (talk) 14:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

No problem. -Liancetalk/contribs 14:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you... Lullwater page

Liance (John) ... Thanks for the assistance with my draft submission. I've kept my submission rather short and sweet with as many quality references as I could so that I wouldn't overwhelm the process and clutter up my article. I look forward to being approved, or to making any necessary adjustments as you feel I need to. Thanks, Joey Lullwaterfan (talk) 13:45, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Lullwaterfan, I have made some edits to your draft article. Hope they help. -Liancetalk/contribs 14:20, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks - I realized I didn't properly credit my references per Wikipedia's standards and was in the process of trying to figure out the proper technique, but you have shown me the correct links for future references. Can I still make new changes and edits while the page is being reviewed for submission??? Thank you, Joey Lullwaterfan (talk) 14:35, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Yes. -Liancetalk/contribs 15:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks John. I'm slowly making a few improvements - just linking a few names to web sites and going to try to insert a photo of the band too. I appreciate your assistance with the page. Hoping I fly through the submission process without much drama !!! - thanks, Joey Lullwaterfan (talk) 13:17, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Liance (John) - Just resubmitted my article after making a suggested change ..... I'd appreciate it if you took a look at it. -Joey Thanks Lullwaterfan (talk) 03:41, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Where to submit a replacement article?

Dear Liance,

I am aware that my article is not on a new topic, which is why it was declined. Where do I submit an article which I largely rewrote because the original one was a bad & wrong stub? It seems wrong to just paste the new version as I did for the ELBO.

Xenonoxid (talk) 21:40, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Xenonoxid, I would just directly edit the article on the mainspace as it prevents issues with edit conflicts and copy-paste moves. It's OK to "largely rewrite" an article directly as long as you make sure your content meets wiki standards (adequately sourced and unbiased). Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 21:45, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for moving my article.

Liance, thank you for moving my article to the draft section! Let me know if there are any changes you think I should make for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JabSVBS13 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

JabSVBS13, I just made some edits to your draft so that it fits wikipedia's standard formatting and manual of style. The article looks good, just make sure it is referenced adequately with reliable sources. -Liancetalk/contribs 16:19, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

I checked over the sources to make sure everything is valid. Looks good. I'll wait and see if the other editors approve it. Thanks again! ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by JabSVBS13 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft/Fabrizio La Torre

Dear Liance, thank you very much for your support This is a draft version of the translation of the original text in French & published on wikipedia.fr — Preceding unsigned comment added by JPDeNeef (talk • contribs) 12:19, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Billy Kametz page

Hello, I made a page named Billy Kametz and I accidentally created it in the mainspace. Are you able to help me move it to a draft page please as I would believe that having it in the mainspace at this point of time wouldn't be appropriate. Thanks ahead. Arithmenick (talk) 04:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Arithmenick, it seems that another editor has gotten that done before I was able to see your message so I hope everything is resolved. -Liancetalk/contribs 18:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Petr Zuska Wikipedia English Profile

hi Liance,

Your colleague has deleted the draft you have moved from sandbox for me. I would have appreciated just knowing what was wrong, I would have gladly corrected it. Can you please help me. 

Katdiamond2020 (talk) 08:26, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Katdiamond2020, an admin deleted your page and in deletion history wrote that it was because your draft was copied with information from this page, in addition to the fact that it was written like a resume. In order to not be a copyright violation text must not be copied from a source that is protected under copyright and must be licensed appropriately. Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 18:51, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Request on 03:27:55, 28 October 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Jansi mary S



Jansi mary S (talk) 03:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi madam/sir, Its me jansi , i need assets because Wikipedia is some thing new for me, and i refereed so many videos but none of them is clear on what i should do exactly , i wanted to publish on nursing documentation so that there will be at least somebody who can use this and it will be helpful in there day today activity i know there is a lot of mistakes but im ready-to correct my self , if it is published please delete it i will take your guideline improvise and come back again 

My aim is to learn not to become famous


Thank you

Hey there Jansi mary S, firstly the article nursing documentation already exists, so if you feel that it needs improvement you can always edit it there. Additionally, content on Wikipedia should be objective, factual and verifiable rather than opinionated - so please make sure any additions are supported by reliable sources and are factual in nature. Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 03:38, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

My article for submission

Thanks for moving my article to drafts . I hope you consider it worthy of becoming a Wiki article. Thanking you in anticipation. Areesha fatima 700 (talk) 10:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Need your expertise

Liance , I hope you would help me regarding this question. How will my article become a wiki article ? I'm fairly new to this , and I still haven't grasped the ropes of it all. Please guide me regarding this. Areesha fatima 700 (talk) 10:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft : Suleman Tahir

So sorry to disturb you , I know you have a lot to do , sorry to pester you again. I just want to ask something. 1) What does it mean that my article has been moved from sandbox to drafts ? 2) what else should I do to make my article more credible AMD more likely to be accepted ? 3) How much time will it take for my article to be com open to public ?

Kindly guide me . Areesha fatima 700 (talk) 12:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Areesha fatima 700, your article was moved to the Draft namespace, which is the location where articles being written are generally placed (they are not live on the Wiki's mainspace). I would recommend for you to add more reliable sources that are independent and show significant coverage of your draft - please refer to WP:GNG and WP:NPROF for notability guidelines. Generally the review process may take some time depending on the quality of your submission; I have formatted your draft to better fit the wiki's styling and format. Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 15:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Sans (Undertale)

Hi, It's been a long since you reviewed the draft but I've I helped out the draft to establish notability. I think it's good to go now in mainspace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.113.79.85 (talk) 23:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

60.113.79.85, I would agree, I've accepted the article and it should be live now. Thanks for your help. -Liancetalk/contribs 23:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

== Thank yo

Thank you

Thank you for guidance Areesha fatima 700 (talk) 10:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Request on 21:35:44, 29 October 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Macgirl


Hi--thank you for your feedback. I am working on a larger article with more robust references that will satisfy Wiki's standards. Is it possible to accept the stub I submitted in the meantime until the longer article is ready? macgirl (talk) 21:35, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi again--please let me know at your earliest. I have developed a longer article with more references and sections but don't want to upload until I hear from you, since you were the one who made the decision on this entry. macgirl (talk) 20:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Macgirl, sorry for the late reply. Generally articles don't get accepted into the mainspace until they satisfy relevant notability criteria like WP:GNG and WP:BIO - that's what AfC is for. If you have a version which may better fit the criteria then you can resubmit the draft with that version and have it reviewed. Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 22:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Liance--thank you for the review and suggestions. I've worked on the draft and it is now much longer and has more Wiki-suitable references. I've submitted it for review to the same link. Here's hoping it will be accepted. Thanks! macgirl (talk) 20:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Liance--checking in to see if you've had a chance to review the updated draft. Will it be you or someone else who reviews the new draft? macgirl (talk) 21:25, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Mixtape Madness, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

About the draft

Hi Liance, I just found you and can you check this draft Draft:Yuri Kozukata, it has been for 2 months. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.194.199.230 (talk) 07:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

FYI

Since you evaluated the AFC draft at User:Abhirupmoitra93/sandbox/WhiteHat Jr, you may be interested in contributing to the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WhiteHat Jr. Regards, Peacock (talk) 16:41, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. -Liancetalk/contribs 23:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Henda Salmeron Page

Hello John, Thank you for your help. I'm new to Wikipedia. The page I created was deleted with some good edits, D8 and G12. I would like to fix and resubmit. Where can I find my deleted page to check links and to properly reference the website that was used for information? Henda Salmeron (talk) 20:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Regina MorrisHenda Salmeron (talk) 20:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Regina Morris

Hi Henda Salmeron, the restoration of your page might not be possible because your page contained copyrighted content, which is why it was deleted. You can try requesting a page undeletion at WP:REFUND, but it is not likely that your undeletion would be granted since copyrighted content is not allowed on the wiki and is usually not kept. If you still have relevant information I would recommend recreating the page from scratch, considering its original form was in part or in whole a copyright violation. Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 12:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, John for moving the my draft to the correct space. I look forward to hearing back on it's creation. I have referenced the Henda's Law website, the law is cited exactly how it reads. So hopefully we can see that it is not a copyright issue. Thanks again. ReginaMorris (talk) 18:43, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Regina


Thomas Nail

Hi Liance,

Thank you for moving my article to the "Draft:Thomas Nail". The article has been rejected twice but no one has told me how to fix the issues. One comment suggests that academics need a "named chair" to be listed, which is clearly no the case for most entries. Another says I need reliable independent sources that are verifiable—but that was what I thought I just added with links to peer reviewed journals, etc. I am super confused. Other entries are way less supported than mine. Can you tell me specifically what I need to do here. Its all so mysterious.

Thank you for your feedback on "Draft:Thomas Nail". The article has been rejected twice but no one has told me how to fix the issues. One comment suggests that academics need a "named chair" to be listed, which is clearly no the case for most entries. Another says I need reliable independent sources that are verifiable—but that was what I thought I just added with links to peer reviewed journals, etc. I am super confused. Other entries are way less supported than mine. Can you tell me specifically what I need to do here? Its all so mysterious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanHSanborn (talk • contribs) 02:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Also: I read the wiki instructions and its pretty clear that the article meets at least one of the academic criteria listed: "The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work – either several extremely highly cited scholarly publications or a substantial number of scholarly publications with significant citation rates. Reviews of the person's work, published in selective academic publications, can be considered together with ordinary citations here. Differences in typical citation and publication rates and in publication conventions between different academic disciplines should be taken into account.

I have linked to google scholar and academia.edu to verify this. Thomas Nail has a book, The Figure of the Migrant, cited 285 times (which is a lot for philosophy books). He also fulfills the other named criteria of "unique" contribution that can be verified by reading the linked book review of Theory of the Border- where the reviewer clearly states the original and unique contribution of a whole new conceptual framework. Check it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanHSanborn (talk • contribs) 03:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Please read this: I am pasting here the explicit criteria on wikipedia for academic notability and precise how Thomas Nail satisfies this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics) Academics meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable.

1. The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.

"The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work – either several extremely highly cited scholarly publications or a substantial number of scholarly publications with significant citation rates. Reviews of the person's work, published in selective academic publications, can be considered together with ordinary citations here. Differences in typical citation and publication rates and in publication conventions between different academic disciplines should be taken into account. To count towards satisfying Criterion 1, citations need to occur in peer-reviewed scholarly publications such as journals or academic books. Publication and citation rates in humanities are generally lower than in sciences. Also, in sciences, most new original research is published in journals and conference proceedings whereas in humanities book publications tend to play a larger role (and are harder to count without access to offline libraries). The meaning of "substantial number of publications" and "high citation rates" is to be interpreted in line with the interpretations used by major research institutions in determining the qualifications for the awarding of tenure."

Here is how criteria number 1 is verified: a) follow the link "highly cited" to google scholar and see that there are several "highly cited" books and many well cited peer- reviewed articles. b) follow the academia.edu link at the bottom to see that Thomas Nail has over 4,000 followers with a quarter of a million downloads. c) when determining "highly cited" consider 1. that philosophy has much lower citation rates than the sciences, 2. that books are much more important that articles, and 3. that Thomas Nail is a tenured faculty, meaning that he has published enough to be considered to have made an impact in his field. d) view his CV on academia.edu to see the 10 books he has written and over 30 peer reviewed articles and major conferences and full range of interviews.

Let me know what you think — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanHSanborn (talk • contribs) 19:19, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks RyanHSanborn (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

--171.60.226.136 (talk) 04:32, 16 November 2019 (UTC)== Submission declined earlier - Content has been edited as per directions ==

Submission of content in link given below was declined by you. The content has been edited as per the observations/directions. Can you review the same for approval. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Stiwarinetlink/sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chenjo9 (talk • contribs) 12:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)


Mike Holmes Jr. - revised draft

Amanda J Heath (talk) 15:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)Hi Liane - thank you for your feedback regarding my first draft for Michael Holmes Jr. in October. I've since revised the entire piece to (hopefully) reflect the wikipedia guidelines. Since I've changed the piece to reflect paragraph format and subtitles. Is it best to create a new article as I'm not sure the correct way to reinsert the resources/citations? I'm concerned as I don't want to be declined again! Sorry, I'm new to wikipedia and having trouble understanding what to do next! Many thanks, Amanda Nov. 12, 2019Amanda J Heath (talk) 15:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi Amanda J Heath, an article needs inline citations to be considered for inclusion and meet notability standards so I would recommend inserting them into Draft:Michael Holmes Jr. There should be a "cite" tool available on the editor, and by clicking on it you can fill in details and create a citation. Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 07:31, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Placenames

Hallo, I see that you moved a sandbox article into Draft:Pac (village). You might like to have a look at WP:PLACEDAB: we disambiguate placenames by a wider placename, so I've moved this article (which another editor moved into mainspace) to Pac, Albania. I think we only use "(village)" etc if we need to distinguish between two or more places of same name and location but different status, eg a constituency, council area, village, etc. Thanks. PamD 17:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Will keep this in mind with future edits. Thanks for letting me know. -Liancetalk/contribs 07:17, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Have updated the draft

Thank you for your feedback, I've have included more articles on the subject Draft:Felix_Barrett. MayWiki1 (talk) 11:30, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

John Lee draft

Hi Liance,

I submitted an article called John Lee for review in August, and I saw you looked at it on August 18, 2019. I was wondering when you think I'll get feedback on it.

Thanks!

Hi Mediaexpert3, at the time of writing an article on John Lee already exists at John Lee (California politician). I have removed your draft from the queue but feel free to improve the article in the mainspace! Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 07:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Aleksandra Rudes

I don't understand, how can the Russian wikipedia article already exist about this person (that I didn't create), yet when I try to make an English version of the page it gets shot down?

Draft:Aleksandra Rudes

I understand the links I provided are mostly in Russian, but she is mentioned in all of them. What am I missing here?--PBLB (talk) 23:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi PBLB, I declined your submission because, for inclusion in the encyclopedia, a subject should fit WP:BIO which means significant coverage in multiple sources, and by the references in your article the subject doesn't appear to meet that quite yet. An article might be published in another wikipedia but that doesn't mean that it is notable by default (and may not meet notability criteria there). Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 07:24, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Csaba Pal

Hi Liance! I am new to wikipedia and I've submitted a draft titled Csaba Pal two month ago. I know you have tons of articles to review and sorry for being impatient, but is there a way to speed up the review process? Thank you for taking time to respond. Regards, Andreea

Sorry for the late response but a fellow editor has reviewed your article at the time of writing. -Liancetalk/contribs 07:32, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Request on 21:49:43, 5 December 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Avilock



Avilock (talk) 21:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC) I have seen your review and would be very grateful for any assistance you can offer me with this article. Thank you in advance

Hi Avilock, your article needs to cite more reliable sources that show significant coverage of your subject for inclusion that are independent; most of the editors who have reviewed the submission so far have noted this. If possible, you need to add more references about your subject that are secondary and reliable (interviews, court cases, etc. do not qualify). Hope this helps. -Liancetalk/contribs 07:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Graduate Hotels

Hi! You left a note on my article for Graduate Hotels that it felt like a conflict of interest when reading. I have since edited the piece to be more objective and included more citations from relevant news sources. Could you please review again? Would love to get my first page published!

Thank you,

Eagate23 (talk) 15:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft: Misión Tiburón

Hi I received a message about my draft - I am not clear as to what's happening, I wonder if there's been any development towards it being published. It has been months. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxy334 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Is edited article in right location?

Thank you for helping me to locate the article on John F. Kilner for initial review. I received helpful feedback on it and have just edited and resubmitted it. But I could not tell if the resubmission went through. Can you verify if it did (in early January), and would you please let me know if it is in the right location to receive final approval? Thanks again! Guitargirl300 (talk) 00:11, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Guitargirl300

Thanks you for your Review and I have a New Question

Hi Liance. Thank you for reviewing my first attempt at a Wikipedia Page - I think I'm getting there slowly! I have just edited the draft on 'Population Data Science' so will await further comments in due course.

In the meantime, can you please help with a quick question? I have been inserting hyperlinks on a few words to link to other Wikipedia pages. However, when I preview the content, it is removing some of the words. For example 'personal data' is showing as just data, and 'record linkage' is showing as just linkage. I am using the full terminology when inserting the hyperlink so I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. If you have any suggestions I'd be really grateful. Many thanks

Hindleysl Hindleysl (talk) 14:21, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your explanation of the location of my draft for the American Jujitsu Association, Liance...very much appreciate your help. Thomas Dineen III (talk) 18:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft : Suleman Tahir

What's the procedure to convert it into a wikipedia page ? Areesha fatima 700 (talk) 17:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:QuPath

Hello, Liance. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "QuPath".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:54, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Re:Your submission at Articles for creation: Giovanni Dall'Orto (March 3)

Hi Liace. Thank you for evaluating the draft about Giovanni Dall'Orto. I think Dall'Orto is encyclopedic because he is a historian known internationally. He also did a lot of things that I didn't put on the page simply because... I'm not able to write it in English. He was the first Italian (but perhaps the first European) to write a book about AIDS, his history books have been translated into several languages, he is also quite well known as a photographer. The sources I used are not his web pages, they are by William Armstrong Percy III, Wikipink (a gay wiki encyclopedia) and googlescholar (where, by the way, he has an H index of 10, quite high considered the particular topic). There would be many other external sources that speak of him, but for laziness or incapacity I have not entered them; however there are numerous books, including English or American ones, like this one or this one. However, it is present on the Spanish Wikipedia (it wasn't I who put the page there), another sign of encyclopedicity. I am however available for all clarifications. --Simpa2000 (talk) 18:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Simpa2000, all wiki articles (especially those biographical in nature) need multiple reliable, secondary, and independent sources in order to establish notability - I rejected your draft because the sources you provided did not meet such criteria. Wikis and user-contributed sites, as well as search engine results, do not demonstrate notability and are not adequate for establishing that. Provided sources should also be independent of the subject (not owned by the subject or affiliated with them in any way). You should try to add more valid sources if you believe the subject is notable enough for inclusion. Hope this helped. -Liancetalk/contribs 18:35, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Request on 08:12:12, 12 March 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by JGreene20


We have been adding updates to our article LIGO Documentary since you reviewed it six months ago and thought it was not validated in public media. We have added significant validation. It appears on your talk page there are no entries after October 2019. Are you still editing? Thanks very much. JGreene JGreene20 (talk) 08:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)


JGreene20 (talk) 08:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Submission for Enyo Sam

Hi, my submission for Enyo Sam was declined last year September. I have updated now can you check if it's ok? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enyosam100 (talk • contribs) 15:27, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Boy & Dragon

Hi there. You may be expecting this to come. Sorry if it bothers you but I'd just like to discuss the issue for improvement of draft. I recently created Boy & Dragon and I know it's kind of stub. Normally animations and cartoon do not receive that much of media coverage as other genres do. That's why I mentioned Animal Mechanicals and Brum (TV series) to get a clear idea how do things work in this category. Boy and Dragon has few independent references such as one from Sunderland Echo and other from Skwigly. I just want to discuss how do we improve pages in this category. Thank you for your time. Lunar Clock (talk) 22:17, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

By any chance, did you manage to find my above message? Thanks. Lunar Clock (talk) 21:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
So sorry for missing your message Lunar Clock!! Thanks for adding additional sources - upon reconsideration it definitely fits the notability criteria with your additions. I have gone ahead and accepted the draft into the mainspace. Thanks for contributing! -Liancetalk/contribs 02:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
It's nice you took your time to respond. I know they are hard times but still thank you. Lunar Clock (talk) 05:27, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for helping my Berklee students! Ijmusic (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

No problem! Subtone was an article of excellent quality and I'm always excited to see new contributions to the wiki. Best, -Liancetalk/contribs 21:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Darren Prince Article

Hi Liance,

I just got your notification about my article and would love to get some help on improving it the right way. I'm brand new here on Wikipedia and would like to learn to be able to contribute more! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtennysdotter (talk • contribs) 18:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Mtennysdotter - welcome! I see that since my review more references that include significant coverage have been added, which have been greatly helpful in establishing notability. At the time of review, I felt that not enough reliable references were added - for example, IMDb is not considered a reliable source, and some of the references did not include significant coverage. However, the draft is in a much better state now, and could definitely be considered for inclusion. Hope this helped! -Liancetalk/contribs 17:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, I really appreciate the feedback. I'll keep working on the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtennysdotter (talk • contribs) 00:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC)


Hi, I added some more sources but not sure if it's enough or if there's anything else I should add to improve it. Do you mind to take a look at it again? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtennysdotter (talk • contribs) 18:55, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Liance/Archive_6&oldid=1225515309"