User talk:Leewills

January 2019[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Info-Screen::Talk 20:17, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Info-Screen::Talk 20:18, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Emilia Clarke, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 20:35, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Jonathan Rhys Meyers, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 20:35, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Seth at a premiere.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Seth at a premiere.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 02:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Sundayclose. Your recent edit(s) to the page Natalie Portman appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:43, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Adam Driver, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a type of change that other editors should be allowed to comment on. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 21:49, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Natalie Portman, you may be blocked from editing without further warnings. Thank you, - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 21:51, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alicia Keys. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 21:52, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Emilia Clarke. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 17:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:17, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Emilia Clarke, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not change the infobox image without discussing it on the talk page first. You've been warned about this before and have continued after your unblock. -- LuK3 (Talk) 11:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had to undo your edit here because it does comply with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Image quality (specifically Poor-quality images—dark or blurry; showing the subject too small, hidden in clutter, or ambiguous; and so on—should not be used unless absolutely necessary.). Please do not introduce the image to the article again. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:48, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits again here because it has been mentioned throughout different sections of the article. In addition, some of your edits do not include reliable sources. Please use the talk page to discuss any issues or problems you may have. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:37, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Leewills, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to me or the Teahouse. They are a lot of friendly editors willing to help out. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:33, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.Leewills (talk) 01:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Natalie Portman. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 17:46, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits[edit]

You were previously asked to stop marking edits as minor that are not minor edits. Doing so is deceptive to other editors. Considering all the warnings you have received here, consider this your FINAL WARNING. READ WP:MINOR. Minor edits are "typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism. Any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it concerns a single word". Sundayclose (talk) 17:52, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Qi'ra, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 14:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Hello Leewills! Thank you for your contributions. I've noticed on most of your edits you do not leave an edit summary. Edit summaries are useful to summarize and explain your edits so other editors know what you changed. You can read more at Wikipedia:Edit summary legend and Help:Edit summary. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Question: How do I go about identifying and contacting editors who make changes to things I've previously edited? Just wondering because it seems easy for people to contact me, but I don't know how to do the same.Leewills (talk) 00:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can view the page history by clicking the "View history" tab on the top of the article. From there you can see who has edited the page, starting with the most recent edit. You can read more at Help:Page history. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:09, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.Leewills (talk) 00:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Emilia Clarke. Sundayclose (talk) 01:37, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kit Harington. Sundayclose (talk) 01:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]