User talk:Lambiam/Archive 22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive
Archives

Invitation to WikiProject Hotels[edit]

Hello, Lambiam.

You are invited to join WikiProject Hotels, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of hotels, motels and lodging-related topics.

To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:33, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Flash Proxy[edit]

Many thanks for your improvements to Flash Proxy! kencf0618 (talk) 23:28, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dorner Manifesto[edit]

The Dormer Manifesto is so well cited and very notable. The article quality ifs crap right now, I agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bamler2 (talkcontribs) 17:25, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of massacres in Turkey[edit]

Hello, I am writing this to you in order to inform you that some Turkish-related articles have for quite some time been hijacked by a group of editors whose only goal, it seems, is to negatively portray the Republic of Turkey, its predesseccors and its people as warmongerming murderers. This has especially become a problem in the article of List of massacres in Turkey where they only allow information about Turks killing others, and delete all reliabely sourced information about massacres against Turks/Muslims. By doing WP:OR, discrediting sources and authors, source falsification, distortion and tag bombing.

Sources which state the number of Muslims casualties during the Greco-Turkish war is persistently being deleted.

Your help is needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.178.77.28 (talk) 20:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Casimir Effect image used by Scientific American[edit]

Hello, Lambiam. You have new messages at MissMJ's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter[edit]

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:01, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey[edit]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trailing zero[edit]

Hi Lambiam,

I'm contacting you with regards to an edit you made to the Trailing zero article in 2008 (see here) which left a broken syntax equation that has not been fixed yet. I'd fix it myself but I'm not sure what you were aiming at and before simply removing the content I thought I'd ask you to see if you'd be willing to fix it yourself. Thanks a lot. Regards. Gaba (talk) 17:19, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An AfD you may be interested in...[edit]

Hello Lambiam,

I noticed that you had concerns for the Lifestyle of the Ottoman Empire article way back in 2007. I want to say that I was in the same boat as you. I nominated it for deletion here. Just to let you know. Thanks, Étienne Dolet (talk) 04:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conway criterion[edit]

Hi Lambiam - Thank you for fixing my blunder in Conway criterion. What was I thinking? One of the existing references sufficed to supply the needed citation but I am researching more examples to cite.--Foobarnix (talk) 16:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eric Burns (communications professional)[edit]

The article Eric Burns (communications professional) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources include brief mentions, quotes, blogs, broken links; nothing remotely close to verifying that he qualifies for a Wikipedia page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CorporateM (Talk) 04:02, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric Burns (communications professional) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Burns (communications professional) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CorporateM (Talk) 20:03, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ag-gag[edit]

Sometime ago you commented on the Ag-gag talk page. I invite you to take a look at Talk:Ag-gag#RFC_regarding_article_title. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 14:59, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail![edit]

Hello, Lambiam. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Upcoming research newsletter (May 2015).
Message added 11:10, 24 May 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

New papers are open for review! —M@sssly 11:10, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail![edit]

Hello, Lambiam. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Upcoming research newsletter (June 2015).
Message added 14:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

—M@sssly 14:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisian Arabic[edit]

Dear User,

As you are one of the contributors to Tunisian Arabic. You are kindly asked to review the part about Domains of Use and adjust it directly or through comments in the talk page of Tunisian Arabic.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 13:40, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you![edit]

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services



Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who discovered America? listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Who discovered America?. Since you had some involvement with the Who discovered America? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 05:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

9[edit]

Your 12 words copied without attribution in the same thread[edit]

I have quoted 12 of your words - including a link you have provided - without quoting you. My quote was later in the discussion of the same thread. Do you want me to go back and attribute the quote to you? Burst of unj (talk) 08:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nah. It should be obvious to anyone reading the thread attentively that these words are copied, and the whole thing is moot anyway (see my latest contribution there).  --Lambiam 10:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly your words[edit]

I have added to the Alan Kurdi article, "Previously, around 5 am authorities started an investigation, after an emergency call had come in that a boat had capsized and lifeless bodies were coming ashore". The words are mostly yours, and the reference was obtained by you. Thank you. --Burst of unj (talk) 20:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]