User talk:Lahiru k/Archive 5

Insignia, continued[edit]

Now I'm officially confused. The images at commons were originally uploaded by you to Wikipedia in 2006. When you uploaded them, you credited them to http://www.uniforminsignia.net/index.php?p=show&id=171&sid=329. If they were created by you, why did you credit them to someone else? -- But|seriously|folks 08:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Award for you[edit]

		The Barnstar of National Merit
		for your outstanding contributions to Sri Lanka related articles, this was long due NëŧΜǒńğer^{Peace Talks} 08:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)[edit]

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Reply[edit]

K thanks will do, oh congradsNitraven 15:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yapNitraven 15:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Hey machan thanks a lot for the Barnstar ill definitely keep up work :) Nitraven 18:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Military ranks and insignia of the Sri Lanka Army[edit]

I have removed the speedy deletion template you placed on Military ranks and insignia of the Sri Lanka Army. Feel free to take it to AfD but I believe it does contain enough context to constitute an article. If you have any questions, please leave them on my talk page. - Rjd0060 16:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,[edit]

hi,

These days I am doing some edits, you can see "Category:Hotels in Sri Lanka". You can support the edits.--Canberaguy 21:07, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

email[edit]

I'll send u an email as soon as i figure out how to do it on wiki :S Nitraven 09:15, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not replying to you earlier[edit]

I am just busy outside of Wikipedia, but I will reply shortly to your message(s). Please keep my talk page on your watchlist. — Sebastian 04:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Lahiru k for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Sumoeagle179 17:28, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely[edit]

You have been blocked indef for abusing your editing privileges after using several sockpuppets accounts as per this discussion and this evidence. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 00:06, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lahiru k (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There was no checkuser done for my block. Please unblock me to defend my self. I hope you understand that this isn't fair by my side since I have not been given a chance to provide reasons and defend myself. I was active during last night (Sri Lankan time) and when I woke up this morning, I was blocked without even a proper warning or time. Please do me justice.

Decline reason:

Your SSP case looks quite convincing. If you'd like to defend yourself, please do so on this page, but until you provide a good reason you'll remain blocked. MaxSem 12:37, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is what happened[edit]

222.165.157.129 is the Mystic/Arsath/Netmonger [Static ip, Sri Lanka Telecom (SLT)]
203.155.31.180 is me [Static ip. SLT] only few months I used that but not now
124.43.000.000 to 124.43.255.255 range use by both of us [Dynamic ip, SLT]

I never used 222.165.157.129 or Mystic/Arsath/Netmonger never used 203.155.31.180 which are both static IPs but we both used 124.43.000.000 - 124.43.255.255 IP range which is assigned to the ADSL/ISDN dynamic pool. If someone can proove that I used 222.165.157.129, I'll pack my bags. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 20:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But a prior checkuser confirmed the case against you and Mystic. --Haemo 20:50, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I contact my blocking admin already and I'm making comments here until he replies me. Yes prior checkuser confirmed Mistic as my sock. As I believe that because both of us are using the SLT's ISDN/ADSL dynamic IP pool. That sock case was full of errors and admin Srikeit done some serious mistakes. In example, User:Ajgoonewardene blocked for nothing. No vote stacking and even he didn't violate WP:SOCK. Other example is User:Mystìc blocked indef and I blocked for 2 weeks saying I'm the sock puppeteer. Don't know how the admins came to that conclusion because my account created on March 6, 2006 and Mystìc created on January 18, 2006. So User:Mystìc is the oldest account from us but I the one who blocked as sock puppeteer. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 21:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they usually go with the less active account when they block sockpuppets. However, I would mention that it's really, really suspcious that Arsath, Mystic's other account, only became active again once you were blocked. It could just be a coincidence, but it's still suspicious — a good alternative is that Mystic = Arsath = Netmonger, and since he was just blocked, it lead to this. Regardless, the Netmonger-Arsath-Mystic connection is clear. --Haemo 23:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well... I explained everything to my blocking admin about the activity of all accounts. Actually there is nothing to hide that Mystic = Arsath = Netmonger. SSP had solid evidence on this and I think Netmonger also not hiding that. Thank you for clarifying me the SOCK hunting method. :) --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 02:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Mystic=Arsath=Netmonger is undisputed. Arsath confirmed it in an email to me.--chaser - t 17:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Lanka issues[edit]

Please see: Discussion move and Specific proposal Your participation and acceptance would be appreciated. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked[edit]

Hi Lahiru k. You have just been unblocked as per this ANI thread. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 22:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re-blocked pending details discussed at the ANI page above. Sorry for the inconvenience. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 22:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked as per The AN. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 21:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Col A.F. Lafir[edit]

Created a page on Col A.F. Lafir but can find a pic. If u can find one can u add it.Nitraven 10:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure but right now I'm blocked and I can upload the picture just after the unblock. If you want I can send the image through e mail. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 10:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

K will change the two articles and if u could send the picNitraven 18:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battles involving Sri Lanka[edit]

Machan why did you put speedily deleted on Category:Battles involving Sri Lanka and remove all the links to it? Nitraven 19:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lets use all three Categories coz battles, operations and war differ from each other :) Nitraven 19:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope battles and operations come under a wars. Coz the war is the bigger deal.Nitraven 19:27, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

K gt it thanks. Will upload it tomorNitraven 19:36, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)[edit]

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:22, 3 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Jimbo's talkpage[edit]

I recognise that you do not care to have a sockpuppet accusation made against you (via comment to another) but you should not just remove the offending remarks. Refuting them, civilly, would be appropriate - but if you do wish to remove them then you should not use TWINKLE or semi automated script but replace them with a "redacted" notice with your reasons. If you feel there is vandalism (neutrally, I feel there might be) then report it to ANI and let an uninvolved admin sort it out. LessHeard vanU 15:07, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the talk pages!!![edit]

I had a read of WP:RS. There is NO indication that these sites are not necessarily permitted. I'm not doing that to bother you. I wan't to improve the articles, as I believe you do. And boxofficeindia.com is the official site of box office figures in India. It is used in a featured article - Lage Raho Munnabhai. Regards, Shahid • ^Talk2me 19:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know why you opposed there, to annoy me. It's not nice and unfair. Yet, may I request you please go and explain yourself? You have no right to write Oppose without any explanation and just giving a short line attached to it. Please explain. If you don't do that, I'm authorized to strike your comment. Best regards, Shahid • ^Talk2me 20:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've found an evidence for boxofficeindia.com being reliable! Please see Indiatimes and TOI mentioned it on several occasions, writing "According to boxofficeindia.com..." - [1][2]. I think if it is mentioned in reputable sites which use it as a source for themselves, it is definitealy reliable. What do you say? Oh yes and please give a more informative explanation for your oppose on the FAC of Preity Zinta. If you don't that in 12 hours, I'll strike it. Regards, Shahid • ^Talk2me 22:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm waiting for an explanation on the FAC, I'm soon there to strike it. Shahid • ^Talk2me 12:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 16:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK: Super Dvora Mk III[edit]

On 5 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Super Dvora Mk III, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai 13:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the talk page for this article, I asked a few questions there... ++Lar: t/c 02:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 03:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your DYK nomination for Ultra Fast Attack Craft was successful[edit]

Did you know? was updated. On November 7, 2007, a fact from the article Ultra Fast Attack Craft, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 02:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 03:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TS Daughters pic[edit]

Do you know you have wrongly labelled TS's daughter as a child soldier? Although I am not to deny that LTTE and the SL government via Karuna does enlist Tamil Children as child soldiers Taprobanus 04:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any evidence? --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 09:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking for cite, but heard in in local TV. Unless we get a transcrip:((Taprobanus 19:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I heard this picture was firstly published on http://www.sankathi.com and a few hours later that child was removed from the picture like this. So if that girls was the daughter of SPT, then why did they remove her? My second question is, if what you are talking about is true, her mom must have got wire crossed with a fancy dress parade and her husband's funeral. Cheers. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 17:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dont want to pro long this dispute any further, see this, you may argue that it is non RS and all but we have it from the horses mouth that is the LTTe that this is his wife and child in fancy dress. If I were you, I will do the reasonable thing and remove the pic or unnecessarily this gets dragged out through nomination for deletion, crap this and crap that and make Sri Lankan centric editors look all the more stereotypical. Do what ever is right by you. Thanks Taprobanus 18:36, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lahiru, thanks for pointing me here! To answer your question "why did they remove her?": Of course I don't know their reasons, but I would like to believe that they saw that it was used against them. You know that I value nonviolence, and that would be a defeat for those who teach their children to value violence. There's hope! — Sebastian 17:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New page and new proposal[edit]

Hello Lahiru! I just created Wikipedia:WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation/housekeeping to separate our internal housekeeping stuff from the current discussion about articles, which is of interest for more than just our members. Please add this page to your watchlist. I also wrote a new proposal on its talk page, WT:SLR/H#Proposed recipients for barnstars. Please let me know what you think of it! — Sebastian 11:16, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Huxley[edit]

My edit was NOT vandalism! It was to correct an error. One cannot be a "member" of the Royal Society, one is elected a Fellow. Please do not revert edits when you don't have the correct facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.63.75.2 (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 16:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:-[edit]

Hello, thank you for this, that's nice, I didn't knew this. --Cyfal (talk) 14:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

--♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 17:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LTTE child soldier.jpg[edit]

Hi. Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation#Image:LTTE child soldier.jpg, I have tagged Image:LTTE child soldier.jpg for deletion. There is an option to re-upload the image under a different title, but you should see the discussion for details. (Also, if there is any information that was overlooked in the discussion, please say so ...). I just want to notify you of the tagging and make sure that you're aware of the discussion. Cheers, Black Falcon ^(Talk) 06:27, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 17:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answer[edit]

Need an answer on my talk page. — Rlevse • Talk • 17:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 17:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)[edit]

The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi My article was cited properly, and I had no new research input. Please explain to me what you consider a libel? Also please do not delete my article to revert to an already libellous article in which a radical writer (who and which is not even scholarly) insinuates that Prof Hoole is anti-Hindu. He does not so far as mention that OTHER ACTUAL SCHOALRS claim that his Christian faith is used against him by the LTTE. SO now tell me how you could allow citations to an article which slanders Prof. Hoole but you cannot allow citations to an article that shows the flip side?

Also Prof. Hoole was appointed by the UGC. The LTTE did use threats and intimidation to stop his assuming position as VC of JU. What else is there? Please make it clear to me why you have reverted to the original article which I find biased and slanderous. Thanks. HeRA474 (talk) 02:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lahiru You Are Needed in an Article[edit]

Dear Lahiru i am also from Sri Lanka. i would like u to please take intrest in the article Kumar because Kumar article is being discriminated by Sikh Extremist due to hate towards Hindu. Kumar is also name of Skanda a.k.a Murugan which is a God in Buddha and Hindu Culture. Please check out article Kumar and fix those Sikh Extremist for vandalising many many important Hindu articles. the IP address for Vandalising Kumar is 129.64.153.64 . i request you to just keep an eye on that article i will deal with the rest. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamil33 (talk • contribs)

Lahiru You Are Needed in an Article[edit]

Dear Lahiru i am also from Sri Lanka. i would like u to please take intrest in the article Kumar because Kumar article is being discriminated by Sikh Extremist due to hate towards Hindu. Kumar is also name of Skanda a.k.a Murugan which is a God in Buddha and Hindu Culture. Please check out article Kumar and fix those Sikh Extremist for vandalising many many important Hindu articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamil33 (talk • contribs)

Sure. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 13:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Lock Page[edit]

I request Lahiru to add protection template and lock page Kumar due to heavily vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamil33 (talk • contribs) 15:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try at WP:RPP. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 15:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mahawilachchiya massacre[edit]

Are you still working on it? It still contained both the "under construction" and the "in use" tag. I already removed the latter. — Sebastian 02:50, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thanks for letting me know. I'm bit busy till tomorrow since I'm away Colombo. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie | tool box} 07:33, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]