User talk:Konstantin Kaysharov
What were you looking for?
Lectonar (talk) 15:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- John of Reading (talk) 15:41, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Finding your draft[edit]
Just in case: your draft is at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Master Konstantin Kaysharov. If you are logged in, you can find all the pages you've created or edited by clicking the "My contributions" link at the top right. Have you seen the comments left by two other editors at the Help Desk? -- John of Reading (talk) 17:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
(More) The draft has been deleted as unambiguous advertising or promotion, so my earlier advice is no longer correct. The log entry for the deletion is here. I guess the next page you could try is Wikipedia:Why was the page I created deleted?. -- John of Reading (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for the help. I just think that it was unnecessary the article to be deleted as I've lost all of my work. Directions for change could have been given, so that I could make it a better article and not to have lost all of my work.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Konstantin Kaysharov (talk • contribs) — Konstantin Kaysharov (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
--Orange Mike | Talk 01:45, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Konstantin Kaysharov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have learned from my mistakes and now that I know I want to be a productive member of Wikipedia. Promise to be more careful the next time and also I am asking for more help in the future instead of instant actions Konstantin Kaysharov (talk) 18:35, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm afraid that your unblock request does not address the reasons for which you were blocked. You will need to respond to these issues and provide very convincing assurances about the status of this account and what you wish to work on to be unblocked. Nick-D (talk) 11:02, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Konstantin Kaysharov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
well I have taken some actions in resolving the problem.about the issue no.1 and no.2 that is why below I requested a change of the nickname, because the user will be used only by one person (me completely new person)-no.2 and that is not Konstantin for who the article was - no.1 and I want to write about him and his deed because I believe he is worth writing for and I believe people should know about him. I am just asking for a chance to write an article and then you decide whether it is worth to be on Wikipedia pr not. Thank you.Konstantin Kaysharov (talk) 13:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't feel confident in unblocking you. Your requested username is fine, but I don't see an assurance that you won't be writing in an attempt to promote Kaysharov. Per your own words, you "believe he is worth writing for". Familiarize yourself with WP:NPOV and then let us know what you will do differently if you are unblocked. -- Atama頭 21:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Konstantin Kaysharov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
If users claim they wish to contribute constructively but there are doubts as to their sincerity, the {{2nd chance}} template can be used to allow them to demonstrate how they will contribute to the encyclopedia, should their unblock request be granted. Education and warnings
Before a block is imposed, efforts should be made to educate the user about our policies and guidelines, and to warn them when their behavior conflicts with our policies and guidelines. Everyone was new once, and most of us made mistakes. That's why when we welcome newcomers, we are patient with them, and assume that most people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it. We also ask that newcomers make an effort to learn about our policies and guidelines so that they can learn how to avoid making mistakes. A variety of template messages exist for convenience, although purpose-written messages are often preferable. Template warnings that state that a user may be blocked for disruption or other blockable behavior may also be issued by regular editors rather than administrators only. -> something that never happened.
Only in extreme cases would there be no administrator who is willing to lift the block, which would effectively make the uncooperative editor banned by the community.
[1] Konstantin Kaysharov (talk) 13:56, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline. There is no appeal in this unblock request, only a copy-and-paste of existing policy. --Chris (talk) 20:39, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Konstantin Kaysharov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
because of the request written above that I should learn the policies and rules on Wikipedia with the previous appeal I wanted to show you that I have really read the policies and to point out some rules that affect my condition and that I think in this case you are not respecting them. also I have read another thing: Note that "indefinite" does not necessarily mean "long" or "infinite". It means "however long is needed for the user to address the issue". This can be minutes, hours - or indeed the user may never do so. An indefinite block means the blocking administrator did not set a time limit on the block. The user needs to discuss the matter with an administrator before any unblock. It could be because the owner needs to confirm things are okay (and nothing's wrong). Or it could be due to some problem needing attention or the user needing to understand some behavior was inappropriate. Typical examples are where the account owner must be contacted (e.g. suspected 'hacking' of their account), and users whose behavior was severely inappropriate (e.g. threats, "outings", repeated vandalism or edit warring, repeated failure to listen, etc.). Wikipedia is an encyclopedia community so behaviors like these are not acceptable. For some issues, a user may need to stop, learn our site norms, and confirm they will not repeat the behavior (or will edit in accordance with certain conditions), before an unblock can take place. Thank you.
Decline reason:
Another copypaste from policy masking a really desperate argument: that indefinite blocks do not have to be forever. Yeah, but they don't have to have a time limit, either. So, since you've basically run out of arguments for unblock, and this was your fourth request on the current block, I'm going to revoke your talk page access so you won't waste any more of our time and someone who might actually deserve to be unblocked will be able to get their request heard. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.