User talk:Kona1611
|
Help[edit]
I created this site based on Lord of the Rings. I could use some help developing it. Would you like to? Here is the link:
http://lordoftheringsmelkorfaction.wetpaint.com/
Please give me some help, I could use it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rembrant13 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi[edit]
Hi Chuck. :) Robshill 01:10, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
New Video Game Article[edit]
Hey! I saw that you created a new video game related article- consider joining the Computer and Video Games WikiProject! I have added your article to the list of new articles, and attributed it to you. --PresN 20:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Universal 75th logo 720x390.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Universal 75th logo 720x390.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:08, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Logos in List of Universal Pictures films[edit]
Per Wikipedia:Non-free content, "The use of non-free media in lists, galleries, and navigational or user interface elements are normally regarded as decorative." Personally, I find the evolution of the logo interesting, but the images are owned by Universal, not us, so we can only use them for limited purposes. —tregoweth (talk) 05:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- The logos don't actually illustrate anything in the article, and are not the subject of the article; therefore, including them doesn't qualify as fair use. In NBC logos, for example, the logos are OK because the article is about the logos. —tregoweth (talk) 08:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
November 2007[edit]
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to RMS Titanic. Thank you. MBK004 01:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Titanic Living survivor[edit]
Hi, The person listed under Living Survivor in the RMS Titanic article has died.
Movies made at the same time in a series[edit]
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{newmessages}} template.
Your question was answered. ~RayLast «Talk!» 19:28, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
February 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michael W. Smith may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:28, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- So here's what happened. You added the link with a missing closing parenthesis. I fixed the link and knew that it pointed to a redirect, but forgot to fix that last night. I just fixed that. There's no need to add the artist's name to the article title as it's the only album of that name. There is a different EP and it has the correct title already. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:05, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Scary Gary's last name.[edit]
Thank you for adding Scary Gary's last name!! I've been trying for years to figure it out!! Country Girl 20:18, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Kona1611. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Kona1611. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of List of PlayStation 2 games with alternative display modes for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of PlayStation 2 games with alternative display modes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of PlayStation 2 games with alternative display modes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 17:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Kona1611. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Notice re: fringe edits[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
--Neutralitytalk 17:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Please read the standardized template above. Fringe publications (like this one) don't belong in Wikipedia articles, whether as references or as "further reading," except perhaps on articles on fringe theories themselves. This is especially true for sources that are both fringe and self-published, like the one in the diff above. Neutralitytalk 17:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)