User talk:Kloth~enwiki
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please refrain from reverting the redirects of the episodes in South Park. Those episodes are not notable enough for individual in Wikipedia. While I have redirected them from here, I have not forgotten the users who created and sculpted them. I have transferred all of the contents except for the infoboxes over to South Park Wiki. The episodes' articles will be much more apprecieated there, since another Wikipedia mergist would probably have gone and redirected them from here anyway.
Cheers! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 06:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Alright, that's enough![edit]
Stop it now! See the discussion on this users'talk page: User talk: Captain Infinity. You'll see that numerous editors have agreed that these episodes do not belong here in Wikipedia. If you continue to engage in these edit wars, I will have you blocked from editing Wikipedia. I will also have you IP address blocked from creating any more accounts. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 06:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
You consider one person as "numerous editors"? Every South Park episode had an article with useful information until you came along. Also, I can't really see a difference in the episodes you deleted…, for instance [[Pip (South Park episode) seems to me as a very fine article. You can't go on deleting the work of hours of different people (I don't care if you moved it to some South Park Wiki of which noone cares about), which for months or years of time seemed fine to other people, without even starting a discussion on the discussion page to see whether anyone would agree with your opinion. --Kloth (talk) 07:36, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
No one cares about? If this weren't a society of people who have to be nice to each other, I'd have yelled out "Choke on your lies!". That wikia happens to have become really developed. Aside from me, there are over ten - twenty edits made to it per day. That's a big increase from what it was five months ago, believe me! And I'm not the only one who cares about it. A user who's named himself after the old title of Mrs. Garrison (Mr. Garrison) is completely devoted to that little encyclopedia dedicated to South Park and South Park alone. If you want to contribute to South Park, I suggest you move there and establish yourself, because when he and I are through getting the wikia to the standards I intend to get it at, people will stop using Wikipedia for information on South Park altogether! Tell me, how do you like that? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 00:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Well okay, maybe you care about it. And some other people too, but that's just not the point. There are a lot of specialized wikis out there that cover a lot of things. I bet there even are some other South Park-wikis out there. Doesn't mean we have to delete content of those things in Wikipedia, just because it's available somewhere else. I, for once, like Wikipedia, and I think it has a lot of useful information on SP. I don't want that information to vanish just because you want to promote your wiki, or that of a friend. Yet, a SP-wiki is a fine idea, but don't promote it by worsening Wikipedia. --Kloth (talk) 17:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
On the other hand[edit]
No discussion about redirecting South Park articles has occurred on any of the talk pages or the Wikiproject pages. Please continue to reinstate articles to their current status as individual pages until consensus on this subject has been reached. Thank you. Captain Infinity (talk) 14:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Happy Valentine's Day![edit]
A short/sweet little message, which I hope has made your day better! Happy Valentine's Day!!! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Nomination of List of The Simpsons writers for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The Simpsons writers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Simpsons writers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Your account will be renamed[edit]
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Kloth. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Kloth~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
00:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed[edit]
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
15:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Kloth~enwiki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)