User talk:Keithkml

Neve

Article has been fully sourced. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Chubbles 23:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Raw foodism

You can call it vandalism if you like, but the fact is that pasteurization was invented to ward off diseases that eating raw foods can cause. "Raw foodism" is a social experiment designed to see how many people fall for it. It's a scam with potentially deadly consequences. Wahkeenah 17:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Clinically proven homeopathic remedies

I have nominated Category:Clinically proven homeopathic remedies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. - Eldereft (cont.) 06:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

• Hi Eldereft, I'd appreciate if you added the 2 pages back to the Category:Clinically proven homeopathic remedies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) category, then re-applied for deletion. It seems that much of the discussion centers around the category being empty. Also I don't understand why the name "scientifically proven paranormal phenomena" fails NPOV. Would you prefer "scientifically demonstrated"?
  
  Taking a step back, I think we both might agree that Wikipedia should clearly distinguish fact from fiction in the world of parapsychology and homeopathy, but do you perhaps think a plain old "List of scientifically..." page would be more appropriate for each?

I have noted at the discussions on which articles I saw the category; if I missed any, please bring them up there to facilitate discussion. I am in perfect accord that Wikipedia should follow reliable sources to clearly distinguish fact from fiction. I would say, however, that these topics are better treated at List of homeopathic preparations, List of paranormal subjects, and individual articles, as any of these venues provides opportunity to detail proper weight to the several opinions expressed by reliable sources. Starting a list would be slightly better than a category, as it would allow for attribution and explication, but I expect that they would also be deleted as content forks failing the neutral point of view policy. Please feel free to start the lists or begin a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Paranormal or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Alternative_medicine if you disagree. - Eldereft (cont.) 16:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Scientifically proven paranormal phenomena

I have nominated Category:Scientifically proven paranormal phenomena (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. - Eldereft (cont.) 06:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Keithkml. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)