User talk:Kau-12

February 2015[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using talk pages as a forum, and because it is apparent that you are not here to contribute to the encyclopaedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kau-12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I assumed the Talk pages were for discussing and criticising the relevant article, which I was doing.

Decline reason:

There's "discussing the relevant article", and then there's ranting about how our policies prevent you from rewriting the article the way you'd like to. You did the latter. Huon (talk) 00:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Were you aware that the GamerGate topic area is under heightened scrutiny? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 22:38, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]