User talk:Junjathory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of Ravindra Upadhyay for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ravindra Upadhyay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravindra Upadhyay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldnpeace (talk) 19:35, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think right now ref source is enough to showing living people biograpghy. very soon provide newspaper sources for this article.

Junjathory (talk) 20:21, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinita Chatterjee has been accepted[edit]

Vinita Chatterjee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 10:34, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Vinita Chatterjee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in reliable sources and current sources are mostly unreliable and interviews. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS💬 09:22, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

💬 Please review again of this article. Unwanted sources and unsourced content deleted so please review again if any issue occured again write on talk page Junjathory (talk) 15:48, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Junjathory (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have two account on wikipedia one is Jrthory and another Junjathory.Account Jrthory blocked for promotion policiy reasons when I don't know the policy then I created another account Junjathory only for reliable content and provide true refernce for any edit.Here my no intension for promote anyone. I want only edit and create pages with reliable and verified news content.Whenever I am unable to provide relible source then I tried to provide reliable source from Google News,Newspaper, Books and Journal. I want Delete account Jrthory permanently and keep account Junjathory.If valid proof needed I can provide so please unblock me from wikipedia Junjathory (talk) 08:43, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Thanks for admitting to your violations of WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. You are not eligible for unblock consideration here. You will have to make the request on your original account. Given your block evasion here, you are basically not eligible for unblock consideration at this time. You may wish to apply, on your original account, in six months under WP:SO. Yamla (talk) 09:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.